Wednesday, November 28, 2012
RT @andersoncooper: Men dragging body behind motorcycle in #Gaza City. They were yelling he was a spy for Israel. http://t.co/Sr47LRNX
Obama Milking America - Art Work On Sale NOW !!!
LIKE
if you Agree that, This is why he got re-elected. I call this work of
art "Obama Milking America" the original copy is available for
purchase. All proceeds will go to Charity. $978,980 starting price. — at The White House.
Obama Loves To Milk
The Norquist Tax Pledge vs Fiscal Cliff
For those of you that don't know, Grover Norquist is a conservative activist who created an "Anti-Tax Pledge" for politicians to sign who are against any and all tax increases in order to let voters know where they stand. All over the news lately (or at least since immediately after the election) is what is called "The Fiscal Cliff." In a nutshell, the Fiscal Cliff is what we are told the country will fall over in January 2013 because of an automatic rise in taxes coupled with a mandatory sequestration on government spending which expert say will be devastating to the economy. What doesn't make sense is that liberals are fear-mongering the public into pressuring the Norquist Pledge Signers into caving in to raising taxes. It doesn't make sense because if nothing is done, taxes are set to raise automatically because the Bush Tax cuts expire. Tom Cohen of CNN says,
"With the U.S. economy showing more signs of improvement in its long recovery from recession, economists point to fears about higher taxes in 2013 as a potential threat to rising consumer confidence."
It seems to me that what I am seeing is very well executed plan by Democrats to put Republicans in a no-win situation: Either they violate their pledge and agree on a compromise which includes raising taxes which can be used against them when the higher taxes are blamed for stunting the growth of the economy even further, OR they can blame Republicans for sending us over the fiscal cliff by doing nothing, OR they can blame Republicans for the national deficit spiraling out of control if they keep their Norquist Pledge and pass legislation to not allow a raise in taxes.
What everyone should keep in mind is that taxes are the dollars earned by the hard work of people like you and I and redistributed to politicians to do with it what they want to. Money is power, so this effectively gives even more power to the Socialists in control of Washington.
Please do not fall for this fear mongering and focus on what's real. We don't have a TAX problem. While it might not be true for the bottom 47% of wage earners, the government gets plenty of our money, in terms of percentage of our income. We have a REVENUE problem. The BEST way to increase revenue is by ADDING more taxpayers by way of increasing the number of jobs (decreasing unemployment) and by increasing average wages (by fixing the economy). And honestly, the only reason we have a revenue problem is because the amount of revenue is nowhere near what the government spends, hence the national deficit. So we also have a major SPENDING problem. The biggest consequence of the current spending problem under the Socialists in control is that they are using a big chunk of the taxpayers money to pay able-bodied people to live comfortable enough to NOT work. This creates an unstable situation of reducing the need to work for people who would otherwise be able to earn enough to pay the taxes to increase the revenue that the government so desperately needs. The end result is a collapse, plain and simple. So Democrats are doing this free-stuff-givaway of taxpayer money in order to earn votes necessary to make such a giveaway possible all at the expense of the entire society, and possibly our beloved country as we have known it. What happens to the United States and her Constitution when the government that runs it and protects it dissolves? And are Democrats doing this knowingly or are they just ignorant of these consequences?
"With the U.S. economy showing more signs of improvement in its long recovery from recession, economists point to fears about higher taxes in 2013 as a potential threat to rising consumer confidence."
It seems to me that what I am seeing is very well executed plan by Democrats to put Republicans in a no-win situation: Either they violate their pledge and agree on a compromise which includes raising taxes which can be used against them when the higher taxes are blamed for stunting the growth of the economy even further, OR they can blame Republicans for sending us over the fiscal cliff by doing nothing, OR they can blame Republicans for the national deficit spiraling out of control if they keep their Norquist Pledge and pass legislation to not allow a raise in taxes.
What everyone should keep in mind is that taxes are the dollars earned by the hard work of people like you and I and redistributed to politicians to do with it what they want to. Money is power, so this effectively gives even more power to the Socialists in control of Washington.
Please do not fall for this fear mongering and focus on what's real. We don't have a TAX problem. While it might not be true for the bottom 47% of wage earners, the government gets plenty of our money, in terms of percentage of our income. We have a REVENUE problem. The BEST way to increase revenue is by ADDING more taxpayers by way of increasing the number of jobs (decreasing unemployment) and by increasing average wages (by fixing the economy). And honestly, the only reason we have a revenue problem is because the amount of revenue is nowhere near what the government spends, hence the national deficit. So we also have a major SPENDING problem. The biggest consequence of the current spending problem under the Socialists in control is that they are using a big chunk of the taxpayers money to pay able-bodied people to live comfortable enough to NOT work. This creates an unstable situation of reducing the need to work for people who would otherwise be able to earn enough to pay the taxes to increase the revenue that the government so desperately needs. The end result is a collapse, plain and simple. So Democrats are doing this free-stuff-givaway of taxpayer money in order to earn votes necessary to make such a giveaway possible all at the expense of the entire society, and possibly our beloved country as we have known it. What happens to the United States and her Constitution when the government that runs it and protects it dissolves? And are Democrats doing this knowingly or are they just ignorant of these consequences?
"Bunker Hill Community College Showcases Painting of President Obama Crucified Like Jesus"
"Bunker Hill Community College Showcases Painting of President Obama Crucified Like Jesus"
You can not steel the likeness of Our Lord Jesus Christ and make it your own. Christians are very offended by this and disgusted to the point of protest.... However you will not see a Christian KILL another human being over this. Muslims in Benghazi however may resort to killing.
Monday, November 26, 2012
Jamie Foxx give title of Lord and Savior to Obama
Let me start off by saying, "how absolutely disgusting is this statement ?" These fools have no belief in our Lord God Jesus Christ the only Savior. Just as Ann Coulter wrote the New York best seller "Godless", I will confirm that Democrats, Liberals, Socialist and Communist believe in a Godless world because if they didnt then their entire political plat form would have to be changed. Besides that, the main stream media is giving these jokers a "Racial" pass card and thats wrong.
IF you are a Democrat, Liberal, Socialist or Communist then you believe that the following statements are 100% ok and should be enforced.
1. Government will take from the hard working class and give to the no working class
2. Government can spend your money better than you can
3. Your world revolves around the Government providing you complete sercurity
4. Personal responsibility is a sin or a curse and should be ignored at all times.
5. Do whatever you "Feel" is best for you at this very moment.
6. Do not donate to any charity or Church because the Government has your back on that crap.
7. Mother Nature destroyed your stuff ? Someone must pay and if they dont the Government will
8. You decided not to plan for a rainy day and a flood took everything you have ? GOVERNMENT !
9. Jesus Christ doesnt save any more, government does.
10. Killing a baby in the womb of a mother is ok if the mother doesnt want it.
11. Telling someone else to pay for you diapers, formula, cheese, milk or other food is a Right.
12. Someone else better pay for my children to get an education
13. Someone else better pay for my retirement
14. Someone else should care for me because I dont want to by smoking and doing drugs.
DO WE NOW LIVE IN CRAZY LAND ? I will not stand for anyone making fun of My Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
- Did I scare you ? Yea can you imagine if Jamie said this about muhamod in the middle east ? Yes you know he would have been beaten and sent to jail.
WAKE UP PEOPLE>
Jesus will forgive you if you only ask.
IF you are a Democrat, Liberal, Socialist or Communist then you believe that the following statements are 100% ok and should be enforced.
1. Government will take from the hard working class and give to the no working class
2. Government can spend your money better than you can
3. Your world revolves around the Government providing you complete sercurity
4. Personal responsibility is a sin or a curse and should be ignored at all times.
5. Do whatever you "Feel" is best for you at this very moment.
6. Do not donate to any charity or Church because the Government has your back on that crap.
7. Mother Nature destroyed your stuff ? Someone must pay and if they dont the Government will
8. You decided not to plan for a rainy day and a flood took everything you have ? GOVERNMENT !
9. Jesus Christ doesnt save any more, government does.
10. Killing a baby in the womb of a mother is ok if the mother doesnt want it.
11. Telling someone else to pay for you diapers, formula, cheese, milk or other food is a Right.
12. Someone else better pay for my children to get an education
13. Someone else better pay for my retirement
14. Someone else should care for me because I dont want to by smoking and doing drugs.
DO WE NOW LIVE IN CRAZY LAND ? I will not stand for anyone making fun of My Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
- Did I scare you ? Yea can you imagine if Jamie said this about muhamod in the middle east ? Yes you know he would have been beaten and sent to jail.
WAKE UP PEOPLE>
Jesus will forgive you if you only ask.
Thursday, November 22, 2012
God is the Foundation of Thanksgiving and why we give thanks.
George Washington's First Thanksgiving Proclamation, 1789
Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and Whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me to
"recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness:"
Now, therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th day of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enable to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.
And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us), and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.
Given under my hand, at the city of New York, the 3d day of October, A.D. 1789.
Given under my hand at the City of New York
The third day of October in the year of our Lord 1789.
George Washington
Dead White Guys, or What the History Books Never Told You: The True Story of Thanksgiving
"Chapter 6, Dead White Guys, or What the History Books Never Told You: The True Story of Thanksgiving by Rush Limbaugh.
-- The story of the Pilgrims begins in the early part of the seventeenth century ... The Church of England under King James I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. Those who challenged ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down, imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their beliefs." In England.
So, "A group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community. After eleven years, about forty of them agreed to make a perilous journey to the New World, where they would certainly face hardships, but could live and worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences. On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs. Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from? From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example.
"And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work. But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found -- according to Bradford's detailed journal -- a cold, barren, desolate wilderness." The New York Jets had just lost to the Patriots. "There were no friends to greet them, he wrote." I just threw that in about the Jets and Patriots. "There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning. During the first winter, half the Pilgrims -- including Bradford's own wife -- died of either starvation, sickness or exposure. When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats.
"Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper! This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives, rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of" the Bible, "both the Old and New Testaments. Here is the part that has been omitted: The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community was entitled to one common share. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well." Everything belonged to everybody. "They were going to distribute it equally. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well.
"Nobody owned anything." It was a forerunner of Occupy Wall Street. Seriously. "They just had a share in it," but nobody owned anything. "It was a commune, folks." The original pilgrim settlement was a commune. "It was the forerunner to the communes we saw in the '60s and '70s out in California," and Occupy Wall Street, "and it was complete with organic vegetables, by the way." There's no question they were organic vegetables. What else could they be? "Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives. He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage," as they saw fit, and, "thus turning loose the power of the marketplace. That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism.
"And what happened? It didn't work!" They nearly starved! "It never has worked! What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation! But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years -- trying to refine it, perfect it, and re-invent it -- the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future." If it were, there wouldn't be any Occupy Wall Street. There wouldn't be any romance for it.
"The experience that we had in this common course and condition,'" Bradford wrote. "'The experience that we had in this common course and condition tried sundry years...that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing -- as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote." This was his way of saying, it didn't work, we thought we were smarter than everybody, everybody was gonna share equally, nobody was gonna have anything more than anything else, it was gonna be hunky-dory, kumbaya. Except it doesn't work. Because of half of them didn't work, maybe more. They depended on the others to do all the work. There was no incentive.
"'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense,'" without being paid for it, "'that was thought injustice.'" They figured it out real quick. Half the community is not working -- living off the other half, that is. Resentment built. Why should you work for other people when you can't work for yourself? that's what he was saying. So the Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the under-girding capitalistic principle of private property.
"Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result? 'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.' ... Is it possible that supply-side economics could have existed before the 1980s? Yes," it did. "Now, this is where it gets really good, folks, if you're laboring under the misconception that I was, as I was taught in school. So they set up trading posts and exchanged goods with the Indians." This is what happened. After everybody had their own plot of land and were allowed to market it and develop it as they saw fit and got to keep what they produced, bounty, plenty resulted.
"And then they set up trading posts, stores. They exchanged goods with and sold the Indians things. Good old-fashioned commerce. They sold stuff. And there were profits because they were screwing the Indians with the price. I'm just throwing that in. No, there were profits, and, "The profits allowed them to pay off their debts to the merchants in London." The Canarsie tribe showed up and they paid double, which is what made the Canarsie tribe screw us in the "Manna-hatin" deal years later. (I just threw that in.) They paid off the merchant sponsors back in London with their profits, they were selling goods and services to the Indians. "[T]he success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans," what was barren was now productive, "and began what came to be known as the 'Great Puritan Migration.'
But this story stops when the Indians taught the newly arrived suffering-in-socialism Pilgrims how to plant corn and fish for cod. That's where the original Thanksgiving story stops, and the story basically doesn't even begin there. The real story of Thanksgiving is William Bradford giving thanks to God," the pilgrims giving thanks to God, "for the guidance and the inspiration to set up a thriving colony," for surviving the trip, for surviving the experience and prospering in it. "The bounty was shared with the Indians." That's the story. "They did sit down" and they did have free-range turkey and organic vegetables. There were no trans fats, "but it was not the Indians who saved the day. It was capitalism and Scripture which saved the day," as acknowledged by George Washington in his first Thanksgiving Proclamation in 1789, which I also have here.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I want to quickly tell you about one passenger on the Mayflower, a guy named Francis Eaton. He was a carpenter. He was not one of the Pilgrims. He was another passenger. He was a carpenter. He died in 1633, 13 years after they landed at Plymouth, and here's what he left in his will: "One cow, one calf, two hogs, 50 bushels of corn, a black suit, a white hat, a black hat, boots, saws, hammers, square augers, a chisel, fishing lead, and some kitchen items" and his season tickets for the Redskins-Cowboys game. No, no, seriously. This is the estate of one of the men who probably built many of the houses for the first settlers. Very modest. But it shows what he saw as wealth back then. By the way, the life expectancy back then was not much. Not compared to today. And just remember, they were not eating trans fats, and they didn't live as long as we do today.
END TRANSCRIPT - Written by Rush Limbaugh
-- The story of the Pilgrims begins in the early part of the seventeenth century ... The Church of England under King James I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. Those who challenged ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down, imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their beliefs." In England.
So, "A group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community. After eleven years, about forty of them agreed to make a perilous journey to the New World, where they would certainly face hardships, but could live and worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences. On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs. Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from? From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example.
"And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work. But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found -- according to Bradford's detailed journal -- a cold, barren, desolate wilderness." The New York Jets had just lost to the Patriots. "There were no friends to greet them, he wrote." I just threw that in about the Jets and Patriots. "There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning. During the first winter, half the Pilgrims -- including Bradford's own wife -- died of either starvation, sickness or exposure. When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats.
"Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper! This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives, rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of" the Bible, "both the Old and New Testaments. Here is the part that has been omitted: The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community was entitled to one common share. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well." Everything belonged to everybody. "They were going to distribute it equally. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well.
"Nobody owned anything." It was a forerunner of Occupy Wall Street. Seriously. "They just had a share in it," but nobody owned anything. "It was a commune, folks." The original pilgrim settlement was a commune. "It was the forerunner to the communes we saw in the '60s and '70s out in California," and Occupy Wall Street, "and it was complete with organic vegetables, by the way." There's no question they were organic vegetables. What else could they be? "Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives. He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage," as they saw fit, and, "thus turning loose the power of the marketplace. That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism.
"And what happened? It didn't work!" They nearly starved! "It never has worked! What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation! But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years -- trying to refine it, perfect it, and re-invent it -- the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future." If it were, there wouldn't be any Occupy Wall Street. There wouldn't be any romance for it.
"The experience that we had in this common course and condition,'" Bradford wrote. "'The experience that we had in this common course and condition tried sundry years...that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing -- as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote." This was his way of saying, it didn't work, we thought we were smarter than everybody, everybody was gonna share equally, nobody was gonna have anything more than anything else, it was gonna be hunky-dory, kumbaya. Except it doesn't work. Because of half of them didn't work, maybe more. They depended on the others to do all the work. There was no incentive.
"'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense,'" without being paid for it, "'that was thought injustice.'" They figured it out real quick. Half the community is not working -- living off the other half, that is. Resentment built. Why should you work for other people when you can't work for yourself? that's what he was saying. So the Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the under-girding capitalistic principle of private property.
"Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result? 'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.' ... Is it possible that supply-side economics could have existed before the 1980s? Yes," it did. "Now, this is where it gets really good, folks, if you're laboring under the misconception that I was, as I was taught in school. So they set up trading posts and exchanged goods with the Indians." This is what happened. After everybody had their own plot of land and were allowed to market it and develop it as they saw fit and got to keep what they produced, bounty, plenty resulted.
"And then they set up trading posts, stores. They exchanged goods with and sold the Indians things. Good old-fashioned commerce. They sold stuff. And there were profits because they were screwing the Indians with the price. I'm just throwing that in. No, there were profits, and, "The profits allowed them to pay off their debts to the merchants in London." The Canarsie tribe showed up and they paid double, which is what made the Canarsie tribe screw us in the "Manna-hatin" deal years later. (I just threw that in.) They paid off the merchant sponsors back in London with their profits, they were selling goods and services to the Indians. "[T]he success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans," what was barren was now productive, "and began what came to be known as the 'Great Puritan Migration.'
But this story stops when the Indians taught the newly arrived suffering-in-socialism Pilgrims how to plant corn and fish for cod. That's where the original Thanksgiving story stops, and the story basically doesn't even begin there. The real story of Thanksgiving is William Bradford giving thanks to God," the pilgrims giving thanks to God, "for the guidance and the inspiration to set up a thriving colony," for surviving the trip, for surviving the experience and prospering in it. "The bounty was shared with the Indians." That's the story. "They did sit down" and they did have free-range turkey and organic vegetables. There were no trans fats, "but it was not the Indians who saved the day. It was capitalism and Scripture which saved the day," as acknowledged by George Washington in his first Thanksgiving Proclamation in 1789, which I also have here.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I want to quickly tell you about one passenger on the Mayflower, a guy named Francis Eaton. He was a carpenter. He was not one of the Pilgrims. He was another passenger. He was a carpenter. He died in 1633, 13 years after they landed at Plymouth, and here's what he left in his will: "One cow, one calf, two hogs, 50 bushels of corn, a black suit, a white hat, a black hat, boots, saws, hammers, square augers, a chisel, fishing lead, and some kitchen items" and his season tickets for the Redskins-Cowboys game. No, no, seriously. This is the estate of one of the men who probably built many of the houses for the first settlers. Very modest. But it shows what he saw as wealth back then. By the way, the life expectancy back then was not much. Not compared to today. And just remember, they were not eating trans fats, and they didn't live as long as we do today.
END TRANSCRIPT - Written by Rush Limbaugh
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Sick Minded Corporate Greed
Greed is defined as by Wikipedia as: " As a secular psychological concept, greed is, similarly, an inordinate desire
to acquire or possess more than one needs. It is typically used to
criticize those who seek excessive material wealth, although it may
apply to the need to feel more excessively moral, social, or otherwise better than someone else."
First part of the definition, ask yourself who decides where the cut off point of "more than one needs" ? Who is telling me I cant make more than X dollars or Im being Greedy ? If you ask me that statement sounds like a union boss or a liberal because, the restrictions would be placed upon you by regulations and taxes which unions, democrats and liberals love to implement. In the first week following obamas reelection he imposed over 6,500 new regulations. Unions donated over $300 million dollars in 2008 to elect obama regardless if the union members wanted to vote a different way.
Hostess Bakery was told by the union that a delivery drive will not carry both Hostess made Wonder bread and Twinkies in the same truck. They also told Hostess that they will not pay for their own retirement nor their own health care. "The company cited the high cost of pensions and outstanding debt as the reasons for that filing. In October 2012, the company filed a plan with the federal bankruptcy court in New York. It called for an 8 percent cut to employees' wages, a reduction in health benefits, and a freeze in pension plan payments for over two years. In return, unionized employees would get a 25 percent equity stake in the company, two seats on its board of directors, and an interest-bearing note worth $100 million. The 8 percent wage cut was part of a five-year deal that included a 3 percent wage increase in the next three years and a 1 percent raise in the final year." Scout.com
Second part of the definition states that Greed is "Typically used to Criticize those who seek excessive material or wealth". Who in the world would criticize a man or woman that invents an amazing product that revolutionizes modern day life ? Take for example the wealthiest sports player ever, he didnt start out wealthy and didn't become wealthy because of his ability to win in his sport, he became wealthy beyond belief when he created and invention that swept the nation of America and then the world. This little invention was a bit pricy but the benefits it provided was obviously well worth it and the public agreed by purchasing over 100,000,000 million units since its conception in 1994. If the man I speak of made a profit of $1 per unit sold he would have $100,000,000 million dollars in the bank and critics would say that's too much. Why would a critic say this ? Answer: Jealousy and GREED. Seriously, who would not be proud of George Foreman and the Foreman Grill ? We all are because he invented a product, took risk to bring it to market which created jobs for millions of people and helped Americans eat a little healthier. This is the Capitalist that I know and love.
Who would have a "need to be excessively moral"? Certainly not George Foreman.
Lastly, Humans for some reason find the need to constantly project their true feeling upon other people for example if you have a companion that constantly accuses you of cheating but you know in your heart and mind thats its it completely false and you honestly havent, the reason why they are doing this is because they are the ones who are doing the dirty deed of cheating.
For hundreds of years Greedy bastards like union thugs and democrats have used these tactics. When they call a person a Corporate Fat Cat they say this because they have no clue how wealth is created. They believe that to "Get" more money you have to take it from someone else and Capitalist know for a fact that its the opposite you have to give your ideas to the world in order to receive their praise and thanks which will arrive in the form of money. If it doesn't you need to go back to the drawing board and find out what they do want. This is Capitalism at its most basic form.
Rush Limbaugh is correct when saying that Liberalism is a disease of the mind because of one simple thing, "GREED".
First part of the definition, ask yourself who decides where the cut off point of "more than one needs" ? Who is telling me I cant make more than X dollars or Im being Greedy ? If you ask me that statement sounds like a union boss or a liberal because, the restrictions would be placed upon you by regulations and taxes which unions, democrats and liberals love to implement. In the first week following obamas reelection he imposed over 6,500 new regulations. Unions donated over $300 million dollars in 2008 to elect obama regardless if the union members wanted to vote a different way.
Hostess Bakery was told by the union that a delivery drive will not carry both Hostess made Wonder bread and Twinkies in the same truck. They also told Hostess that they will not pay for their own retirement nor their own health care. "The company cited the high cost of pensions and outstanding debt as the reasons for that filing. In October 2012, the company filed a plan with the federal bankruptcy court in New York. It called for an 8 percent cut to employees' wages, a reduction in health benefits, and a freeze in pension plan payments for over two years. In return, unionized employees would get a 25 percent equity stake in the company, two seats on its board of directors, and an interest-bearing note worth $100 million. The 8 percent wage cut was part of a five-year deal that included a 3 percent wage increase in the next three years and a 1 percent raise in the final year." Scout.com
Second part of the definition states that Greed is "Typically used to Criticize those who seek excessive material or wealth". Who in the world would criticize a man or woman that invents an amazing product that revolutionizes modern day life ? Take for example the wealthiest sports player ever, he didnt start out wealthy and didn't become wealthy because of his ability to win in his sport, he became wealthy beyond belief when he created and invention that swept the nation of America and then the world. This little invention was a bit pricy but the benefits it provided was obviously well worth it and the public agreed by purchasing over 100,000,000 million units since its conception in 1994. If the man I speak of made a profit of $1 per unit sold he would have $100,000,000 million dollars in the bank and critics would say that's too much. Why would a critic say this ? Answer: Jealousy and GREED. Seriously, who would not be proud of George Foreman and the Foreman Grill ? We all are because he invented a product, took risk to bring it to market which created jobs for millions of people and helped Americans eat a little healthier. This is the Capitalist that I know and love.
Who would have a "need to be excessively moral"? Certainly not George Foreman.
Lastly, Humans for some reason find the need to constantly project their true feeling upon other people for example if you have a companion that constantly accuses you of cheating but you know in your heart and mind thats its it completely false and you honestly havent, the reason why they are doing this is because they are the ones who are doing the dirty deed of cheating.
For hundreds of years Greedy bastards like union thugs and democrats have used these tactics. When they call a person a Corporate Fat Cat they say this because they have no clue how wealth is created. They believe that to "Get" more money you have to take it from someone else and Capitalist know for a fact that its the opposite you have to give your ideas to the world in order to receive their praise and thanks which will arrive in the form of money. If it doesn't you need to go back to the drawing board and find out what they do want. This is Capitalism at its most basic form.
Rush Limbaugh is correct when saying that Liberalism is a disease of the mind because of one simple thing, "GREED".
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Note to Editor - American Birth and Demise
Before the birth of our nation, there were only monarchies and dictatorships. The United States was unique in the hirstory of man, with or Constitution, Bill of Rights and the Freedom of the Press.
After this past election, the president and his Czars can mandate any law with the backing of a liberal justice system, making Congress irrelevant.
The Press is now dead and the constitiution and bill of rights is being trampled over. We are now just another third world dictatorship.
Gordon S.
Cincinnati Ohio.
After this past election, the president and his Czars can mandate any law with the backing of a liberal justice system, making Congress irrelevant.
The Press is now dead and the constitiution and bill of rights is being trampled over. We are now just another third world dictatorship.
Gordon S.
Cincinnati Ohio.
Arizona Gun Store Owner Stands up against Obama and tells voters to get out.
The Southwest Shooting Authority in Pinetop, Ariz. posted a sign on its door and took out a newspaper ad declaring that if you voted for the president last week, you’re not allowed inside.
“If you voted for Obama, please turn around and leave! You have proven that you are not responsible enough to own a firearm!” the sign states.
He said he’s gotten support for his new policy from around the country — including one person who ordered hundreds of dollars worth of ammunition — but that there have also been lots of “vile, rude and hateful comments.”
“I hate it because my 17-year-old son answers the phone and they light into him,” Reynolds said. “They call us stupid rednecks and racist.”
Reynolds told Fox that no matter what happens, the sign is staying up.
“If we lose the whole business it doesn’t matter,” he said. “The bottom line is — my values.”
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Rupert Murdoch Under Fire for MidEast Tweet
Rupert Murdoch Under Fire for MidEast Tweet: ‘Can’t Obama Stop His Friends in Egypt Shelling Israel?’
It blows my mind how Jews in America can continue to vote Democrat when the very party they are voting for is throwing them under the bus.
Wake up everyone who is of Jewish decent - the democrats do not care about you what so ever. They are throwing your homeland under the bus along with you. Take a stand against Democrats and Socialism.
Brian.
Sick bias in Yahoo! and AP article against Israel
In case you have been living under a rock, Hamas in the Gaza Strip and Israelis have been firing rockets at each other in what appears to be an escalating fight that could soon be considered an all-out war, especially if ground fighting commences. While the following AP article by Ian Deitch and Ibrahim Barzak, featured on the front page of Yahoo.com is not the first example of anti-Semitic bias coming from liberal journalists, I just felt the need to point it out to you. Please read the article here.
This article left me with the false impression that the big bad bullies are purposefully avoiding diplomacy in order to use excessive and unprovoked force on a defenseless little group of civilians and other non-military targets. The authors made gratuitous use of the word "offensive" to drive home his point. This isn't an offensive as much as it is a response, but it wasn't until the sixth paragraph that it was pointed out:
"Israel launched the operation on Wednesday in what it said was an effort to end months of rocket fire out of the Hamas-ruled territory. It began the offensive with an unexpected airstrike that killed Hamas' powerful military chief, and since then has relentlessly targeted suspected rocket launchers and storage sites."
After this brief random act of journalism, the author quickly snapped back to liberal "victim" mode by mentioning the disparity between the dead and wounded of the Palestinians verses the Israelis, highlighting the civilian numbers.
How about this for warmongering: When Maj. Gen. Tal Russo, Israel's southern commander was "asked whether Israel is ready to send ground troops into Gaza, he said: 'Absolutely.'"
Words matter. This sentence sounds like Tal Russo is definitely going to invade, and trust me, the authors desperately hope you think so, to further the narrative of the "bullies" being warmongers. But he wasn't asked if he was going to invade. He was asked if he was READY to send troops. Even if he wasn't ready to invade he would have been obligated to say he was. This was a trick question in order to get the reader to believe something other than what was really meant.
Then here is the Big Whopper lie in the article:
"The White House said President Barack Obama was also in touch with the Egyptian and Turkish leaders. The U.S. has solidly backed Israel so far."
That is a boldface LIE. The truth is that the U.S. has been solidly backing Israel since the beginning all the way up until we elected a Commander-in-Chief that turned out to be clearly anti-Semitic in 2008. There has been a clear reversal of the above statement since Barack Obama took office with every action he has ever taken. Listen to Michael Savage talk about the last time Israel's Prime Minister had a chance to visit America:
Then the authors unwittingly give support to my belief that an Obama Administration led U.S. is NOT backing Israel by writing this"
"Speaking on Air Force One, deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said that the White House believes Israel "has the right to defend itself" against attack and that the Israelis will make their own decisions about their "military tactics and operations."
Translation: Israel, you are on your own.
To put an exclamation point on my belief that the U.S. sadly no longer backs Israel, the authors end the article with this paragraph:
"[Egypt's President] Morsi warned that a ground operation by Irael will have 'repercussions' across the region. 'All must realize the situation is different than before, and the people of the region now are different than before and the leaders are different than before,' he said at a joint press conference with Turkey's Islamist prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Erdogan, like Morsi, leads an Islamist government that has chilly diplomatic ties with Israel."
Translation: Neither George W. Bush or Mitt Romney can save you now.
I'm not really sure why these authors put the lie into this article. Maybe they are merely just mistaken? Considering the pro-Hamas bias in the article, I am left to conclude that by believing the U.S. has Israel's back, it makes them look even more like bullies than they are already made out to be. It could also be that since the authors are liberal and pro-Hamas, that they must also hate the U.S. and that if they subscribe to the old adage that an enemy of my enemy is my friend, then the reverse must be true. In other words, since Israel is the authors' enemy, and the U.S. is the authors' enemy, then Israel and the U.S. must still be friends. Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
This article left me with the false impression that the big bad bullies are purposefully avoiding diplomacy in order to use excessive and unprovoked force on a defenseless little group of civilians and other non-military targets. The authors made gratuitous use of the word "offensive" to drive home his point. This isn't an offensive as much as it is a response, but it wasn't until the sixth paragraph that it was pointed out:
"Israel launched the operation on Wednesday in what it said was an effort to end months of rocket fire out of the Hamas-ruled territory. It began the offensive with an unexpected airstrike that killed Hamas' powerful military chief, and since then has relentlessly targeted suspected rocket launchers and storage sites."
After this brief random act of journalism, the author quickly snapped back to liberal "victim" mode by mentioning the disparity between the dead and wounded of the Palestinians verses the Israelis, highlighting the civilian numbers.
How about this for warmongering: When Maj. Gen. Tal Russo, Israel's southern commander was "asked whether Israel is ready to send ground troops into Gaza, he said: 'Absolutely.'"
Words matter. This sentence sounds like Tal Russo is definitely going to invade, and trust me, the authors desperately hope you think so, to further the narrative of the "bullies" being warmongers. But he wasn't asked if he was going to invade. He was asked if he was READY to send troops. Even if he wasn't ready to invade he would have been obligated to say he was. This was a trick question in order to get the reader to believe something other than what was really meant.
Then here is the Big Whopper lie in the article:
"The White House said President Barack Obama was also in touch with the Egyptian and Turkish leaders. The U.S. has solidly backed Israel so far."
That is a boldface LIE. The truth is that the U.S. has been solidly backing Israel since the beginning all the way up until we elected a Commander-in-Chief that turned out to be clearly anti-Semitic in 2008. There has been a clear reversal of the above statement since Barack Obama took office with every action he has ever taken. Listen to Michael Savage talk about the last time Israel's Prime Minister had a chance to visit America:
Then the authors unwittingly give support to my belief that an Obama Administration led U.S. is NOT backing Israel by writing this"
"Speaking on Air Force One, deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said that the White House believes Israel "has the right to defend itself" against attack and that the Israelis will make their own decisions about their "military tactics and operations."
Translation: Israel, you are on your own.
To put an exclamation point on my belief that the U.S. sadly no longer backs Israel, the authors end the article with this paragraph:
"[Egypt's President] Morsi warned that a ground operation by Irael will have 'repercussions' across the region. 'All must realize the situation is different than before, and the people of the region now are different than before and the leaders are different than before,' he said at a joint press conference with Turkey's Islamist prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Erdogan, like Morsi, leads an Islamist government that has chilly diplomatic ties with Israel."
Translation: Neither George W. Bush or Mitt Romney can save you now.
I'm not really sure why these authors put the lie into this article. Maybe they are merely just mistaken? Considering the pro-Hamas bias in the article, I am left to conclude that by believing the U.S. has Israel's back, it makes them look even more like bullies than they are already made out to be. It could also be that since the authors are liberal and pro-Hamas, that they must also hate the U.S. and that if they subscribe to the old adage that an enemy of my enemy is my friend, then the reverse must be true. In other words, since Israel is the authors' enemy, and the U.S. is the authors' enemy, then Israel and the U.S. must still be friends. Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
Israel Intercepts Gaza Rocket Aimed at Tel Aviv
The Blaze Reports : Full Story
Footage from Associated Press Television News shows a plume of smoke emanating from an Iron Dome battery deployed in Tel Aviv followed by a flash of light overhead as the rocket is intercepted. People huddled along Tel Aviv’s beachfront boardwalk cheered as the interception took place. Air raid sirens had sounded to warn residents to take cover.
Footage from Associated Press Television News shows a plume of smoke emanating from an Iron Dome battery deployed in Tel Aviv followed by a flash of light overhead as the rocket is intercepted. People huddled along Tel Aviv’s beachfront boardwalk cheered as the interception took place. Air raid sirens had sounded to warn residents to take cover.
The "Red" Coats are Coming and Obamas Master Plan
Its not enough for me to say wake the hell up any more, because you must now wake your stupid neighbor.
Communism is a disease that will cause hallucinations into sick twisted beliefs of media bias and non-sense that will eventually be the cause of your own early demise. Communism is a slow acting disease that doesn't take hold over night, it usually takes years and sometime decades before its completely irreversible. It starts with agreeing that its ok for the Government to tax and spend into prosperity and to have more and more control over the states and their people. Another sign is when you start to agree with the democrate party and watching MSNBC.
When you see Democrats and Unions pushing for the good of everyone you are on the path to Communism. They will convenience you that they know better how to spend your money than you do. The Government will start to give Giant auto makers and Banks your hard earned tax dollars to keep them open for business when in reality their tragic decisions would have sunk any random business. Governments and Unions will convince employees that they should tell the CEO of their company how to run his business because the CEO does nothing all day but play golf. CEO's dont know what it takes to run a company but the employees do.
Unions have become completely communist and they will pay politians to pass laws that give them more and more power. For example if the Unions want to spend millions of employee dollars to support Obama there is nothing anyone can do about it. Unions vote Democrat 95% of the time and there is always an agenda for that, to push closer and closer into communism. Democrats ! why democrate ? Because they are both on the same path with the same agenda. Give all the power to the government and the more they control your lives the longer the stay in power. Look at Russia in the last 100 years and you can see a perfect time line and excellent results of Communism.
We must begin by taking back our schools where the unions have been indoctrinating them for decades. Why would obama send his kids to private schools ? Because he knows that public schools are in place to keep our children stupid and to not teach them about how to be successful in life. obama knows that if he can keep 51% of the people in America stupid then he will always win.
Capitalism will save you from communism.
When you see Democrats and Unions pushing for the good of everyone you are on the path to Communism. They will convenience you that they know better how to spend your money than you do. The Government will start to give Giant auto makers and Banks your hard earned tax dollars to keep them open for business when in reality their tragic decisions would have sunk any random business. Governments and Unions will convince employees that they should tell the CEO of their company how to run his business because the CEO does nothing all day but play golf. CEO's dont know what it takes to run a company but the employees do.
Unions have become completely communist and they will pay politians to pass laws that give them more and more power. For example if the Unions want to spend millions of employee dollars to support Obama there is nothing anyone can do about it. Unions vote Democrat 95% of the time and there is always an agenda for that, to push closer and closer into communism. Democrats ! why democrate ? Because they are both on the same path with the same agenda. Give all the power to the government and the more they control your lives the longer the stay in power. Look at Russia in the last 100 years and you can see a perfect time line and excellent results of Communism.
We must begin by taking back our schools where the unions have been indoctrinating them for decades. Why would obama send his kids to private schools ? Because he knows that public schools are in place to keep our children stupid and to not teach them about how to be successful in life. obama knows that if he can keep 51% of the people in America stupid then he will always win.
Capitalism will save you from communism.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Mass Exodus of Jobs in America
In order to create a new job a few things must come into play in order for this to happen.
1. Healthy and growing economy
2. Augmentation of New Business
3. Expanding business to match consumer demand
4. Business Owner confidence in expansion
So if you think about it business starts with Entrepreneurship and grows because of supply and demand from the consumer. Government plays a key role because it will directly effect a business by regulation or deregulation.
The best example of this in our history is during Ronald Reagan's presidency. Reagan enacted lower marginal tax rates in conjunction with simplified income tax codes and continued deregulation.
What this means is that the Government got out of the way of Business to grow and prosper which actually created more jobs, more millionaires, and greater consumer and business confidence. Lower taxes created more money for the Government as well because consumers and business had more money and didnt look for ways to evade taxes.
Remember when you first got cable t.v. and were able to watch MTV or HBO ? Stop and think for on minute and understand that the cable t.v. BOOM was because of one simple thing Reagan enacted... DEREGULATION of the telephone and cable line. In 1984, Congress passed the Cable Communications Policy Act. This created millions of new jobs and new inventions as well as new business and the American people were the beneficiary of deregulation. It was so easy to get a job during the 1980's and 1990's.
What is going on in America today that is making it so hard to get a job ?
1. Corporate bankruptcy has soared during Obama administration and no net growth.
2. New business filings are non-exsistant
3. Consumer demand is down due to many factors including 15% unemployment
4. Obama HATES business owners and ran against them in his reelection and in the first week of his reelection he enacted over 6,100 new regulations.
We need to get back to what the founding father believed which was small federal government and that the power lies with the states. They revolted against Britain because of regulations and taxes and when you have a federal government that is spending deficit of $120 billion dollars in the month of October 2012 that's just absolutely insane.
1. Healthy and growing economy
2. Augmentation of New Business
3. Expanding business to match consumer demand
4. Business Owner confidence in expansion
So if you think about it business starts with Entrepreneurship and grows because of supply and demand from the consumer. Government plays a key role because it will directly effect a business by regulation or deregulation.
The best example of this in our history is during Ronald Reagan's presidency. Reagan enacted lower marginal tax rates in conjunction with simplified income tax codes and continued deregulation.
What this means is that the Government got out of the way of Business to grow and prosper which actually created more jobs, more millionaires, and greater consumer and business confidence. Lower taxes created more money for the Government as well because consumers and business had more money and didnt look for ways to evade taxes.
Remember when you first got cable t.v. and were able to watch MTV or HBO ? Stop and think for on minute and understand that the cable t.v. BOOM was because of one simple thing Reagan enacted... DEREGULATION of the telephone and cable line. In 1984, Congress passed the Cable Communications Policy Act. This created millions of new jobs and new inventions as well as new business and the American people were the beneficiary of deregulation. It was so easy to get a job during the 1980's and 1990's.
What is going on in America today that is making it so hard to get a job ?
1. Corporate bankruptcy has soared during Obama administration and no net growth.
2. New business filings are non-exsistant
3. Consumer demand is down due to many factors including 15% unemployment
4. Obama HATES business owners and ran against them in his reelection and in the first week of his reelection he enacted over 6,100 new regulations.
We need to get back to what the founding father believed which was small federal government and that the power lies with the states. They revolted against Britain because of regulations and taxes and when you have a federal government that is spending deficit of $120 billion dollars in the month of October 2012 that's just absolutely insane.
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Revelations #1: A Misconception of Wealth Redistribution
I read a liberal comment today:
"What about the tax cuts that the GOP is so concerned about keeping for the wealthy. Romney lost because the working American people are tired of the upper economic classes getting the breaks when the people who do the work are always having to scrimp and scrape to get by. The Republicians always oppose what's going to help the average person. That's why Romney lost."
It got me thinking... What does this person think helps the average person? Well first of all it is something Republicans oppose. But digging a little deeper into this comment you'll see that he thinks the average person works harder than the wealthy. He says "people who do the work" are tired of breaks for the upper class, as if the upper class folks don't even work. Apparently the rich do nothing except vacation, golf and dine in fancy restaurants. Is this correct? Have you ever met a business owner? Can you even imagine the hours they work?
He also reveals his belief that tax cuts are some sort of a gift from the government to a recipient, in this case the wealthy. In fact, a big problem Republicans have is that liberals have successfully ingrained into the public that the word "CUT" in tax cuts is a NOUN while the naive Republicans still think its a VERB. In the public's mind, they didn't cut taxes, they handed out a cut of taxes, much like a cut of prime rib, or a slice of pie. By now you should know that the government doesn't create the wealth that they are handing out like desert. They have to take it from someone to redistribute, and quite frankly, I think this is the very definition of the socialism that leads directly to communism. But I digress...
So, what does this commenter think helps the average person? While most sane people think that this poster thinks that the average person just needs more money to make ends meet and live a little lit less stressed life, I believe this assumption is wrong. This commenter has shown his hand. It's not just the financial gap between the Haves and the Have-Nots. It's also the perceived gap in the amount of labor performed!
So in conclusion, this poster has inadvertently revealed a subconscious goal that I would argue that most socialists share - to help the average person (i.e. "worker") by giving him or her a large enough "cut" of government money in order to close the perceived gap in the amount of work being done by the rich and the rest of us. In other words, they want to get paid to sit on their asses.
"What about the tax cuts that the GOP is so concerned about keeping for the wealthy. Romney lost because the working American people are tired of the upper economic classes getting the breaks when the people who do the work are always having to scrimp and scrape to get by. The Republicians always oppose what's going to help the average person. That's why Romney lost."
It got me thinking... What does this person think helps the average person? Well first of all it is something Republicans oppose. But digging a little deeper into this comment you'll see that he thinks the average person works harder than the wealthy. He says "people who do the work" are tired of breaks for the upper class, as if the upper class folks don't even work. Apparently the rich do nothing except vacation, golf and dine in fancy restaurants. Is this correct? Have you ever met a business owner? Can you even imagine the hours they work?
He also reveals his belief that tax cuts are some sort of a gift from the government to a recipient, in this case the wealthy. In fact, a big problem Republicans have is that liberals have successfully ingrained into the public that the word "CUT" in tax cuts is a NOUN while the naive Republicans still think its a VERB. In the public's mind, they didn't cut taxes, they handed out a cut of taxes, much like a cut of prime rib, or a slice of pie. By now you should know that the government doesn't create the wealth that they are handing out like desert. They have to take it from someone to redistribute, and quite frankly, I think this is the very definition of the socialism that leads directly to communism. But I digress...
So, what does this commenter think helps the average person? While most sane people think that this poster thinks that the average person just needs more money to make ends meet and live a little lit less stressed life, I believe this assumption is wrong. This commenter has shown his hand. It's not just the financial gap between the Haves and the Have-Nots. It's also the perceived gap in the amount of labor performed!
So in conclusion, this poster has inadvertently revealed a subconscious goal that I would argue that most socialists share - to help the average person (i.e. "worker") by giving him or her a large enough "cut" of government money in order to close the perceived gap in the amount of work being done by the rich and the rest of us. In other words, they want to get paid to sit on their asses.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Lesson of 2012: Propaganda Works!
A new Pew Poll came out today that says if America falls off the "Fiscal Cliff," 53% will blame the GOP (Republicans) to only 29% blaming President Obama.
First of all remember the difference between reality and perception. We are talking about a party that let their president add $4.8 trillion to the national deficit in only 3 years, more than Bush did in 8 years. The economic crisis started when Democrats took over the real power in America - both the House of Representatives and Senate of Congress, in 2006. Meanwhile the downward spiral looks to be slowing finally, thanks largely to the sweeping victories of the GOP (particularly the Tea Party) in the 2010 election, which gave the House back to the party which I thought everyone knew was the more fiscally responsible.
I should think again.
It turns out, whatever lie NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Hollywood, teachers, professors, labor unions, musicians, the NY Times, community organizers or any other entity that makes up the propaganda arm of the progressive movement tell you or your children, IS REAL.
This Pew Poll just tells me two things: #1 the false propaganda worked. #2 the GOP needs to spend all of their time, energy, resources and money into taking back the schools to stop the indoctrination of our children and implement a program to properly educate adults not only of the righteousness of conservatism, but the evils of socialism.
And don't listen to the simpletons on the news networks saying "the GOP has a demographics problem." That is just code for, "the indoctrination of graduates of the last 20 years is finally paying dividends." We have a perception problem. Re-educating them is now required, but let's prevent the Cancer of America in the first place, not just administer chemotherapy. We just have to prey Socialism in America is not stage 4.
Here is a guy named Toots Sweet that points out that our ability to get the message out is so bad compared to the Left that we are left with no other choice but to "get out of their way" and "let them sink themselves" by letting them raise taxes and spend like drunken sailors until America is collapsed. His video:
I really hope it doesn't collapse but if we can't get our message out, Toots is right - we must let them see for themselves what communism does.
First of all remember the difference between reality and perception. We are talking about a party that let their president add $4.8 trillion to the national deficit in only 3 years, more than Bush did in 8 years. The economic crisis started when Democrats took over the real power in America - both the House of Representatives and Senate of Congress, in 2006. Meanwhile the downward spiral looks to be slowing finally, thanks largely to the sweeping victories of the GOP (particularly the Tea Party) in the 2010 election, which gave the House back to the party which I thought everyone knew was the more fiscally responsible.
I should think again.
It turns out, whatever lie NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Hollywood, teachers, professors, labor unions, musicians, the NY Times, community organizers or any other entity that makes up the propaganda arm of the progressive movement tell you or your children, IS REAL.
This Pew Poll just tells me two things: #1 the false propaganda worked. #2 the GOP needs to spend all of their time, energy, resources and money into taking back the schools to stop the indoctrination of our children and implement a program to properly educate adults not only of the righteousness of conservatism, but the evils of socialism.
And don't listen to the simpletons on the news networks saying "the GOP has a demographics problem." That is just code for, "the indoctrination of graduates of the last 20 years is finally paying dividends." We have a perception problem. Re-educating them is now required, but let's prevent the Cancer of America in the first place, not just administer chemotherapy. We just have to prey Socialism in America is not stage 4.
Here is a guy named Toots Sweet that points out that our ability to get the message out is so bad compared to the Left that we are left with no other choice but to "get out of their way" and "let them sink themselves" by letting them raise taxes and spend like drunken sailors until America is collapsed. His video:
Treason
In America only 16 people have been tried for Treason from 1776 - 2012. I am shocked to learn that some of them were pardoned by sitting presidents. Treason is defined by the US Constitutional Dictionary as "treason n the offense of attempting to overthrow the government of
one's country or of assisting its enemies in war Source:
NMW" and Article Three of the United States Constitution listed on Wikipedia defines Treason as:
1. Allowed Americans to be raped and killed while he watched and denied assistance 3 times.
2. Lied to the American people about the extent of what happened. Knowingly misled.
3. Aiding foreign enemy by not lending support during an act of war.
You need two witnesses to attest to these charges and I would subpoena:
1. Hilary Rodham Clinton and
2. General David Howell Petraeus
The following are persons accused and tried of Treason in America from 1776 - 2012 you may soon add President Obama.
Section 3: Treason
Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.I have gone to this length to show how President Obama maybe guilty for Treason for at least one crime and maybe more. I say this based on information coming out of the Benghazi massacre. The president was at the very least requested to send military assistance in what had become a 7 hour long over throw of an American Embassy and the rape and torture of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and the murder of U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith and U.S. embassy security personnel Special Forces Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods. The request for help by America was denied by what has come out most recently by President Barack Hussein Obama. It is also being exposed that Obama had a live feed to the attack and watched it as our American heros were being slain. Obama then went to sleep and attended a fund raiser for his reelection in Las Vegas. Obama knew what happened as it fell apart and then LIED to the American people about it.Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained.
1. Allowed Americans to be raped and killed while he watched and denied assistance 3 times.
2. Lied to the American people about the extent of what happened. Knowingly misled.
3. Aiding foreign enemy by not lending support during an act of war.
You need two witnesses to attest to these charges and I would subpoena:
1. Hilary Rodham Clinton and
2. General David Howell Petraeus
The following are persons accused and tried of Treason in America from 1776 - 2012 you may soon add President Obama.
- Philip Vigol and John Mitchell, convicted of treason and sentenced to hanging; pardoned by George Washington; see Whiskey Rebellion.
- Governor Thomas Dorr 1844, convicted of treason against the state of Rhode Island; see Dorr Rebellion; released in 1845; civil rights restored in 1851; verdict annulled in 1854.
- John Brown, convicted of treason against the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1859 and executed for attempting to organize armed resistance to slavery.
- Aaron Dwight Stevens, took part in John Brown's raid and was executed in 1860 for treason against Virginia.
- William Bruce Mumford, convicted of treason and hanged in 1862 for tearing down a United States flag during the American Civil War.
- Mary Surratt, Lewis Powell, David Herold, and George Atzerodt, all hanged on July 7, 1865 for treason and conspiracy for the Lincoln assassination and conspiracy - by military tribunal.
- Iva Toguri D'Aquino, who is frequently identified with "Tokyo Rose" convicted 1949. Subsequently pardoned by President Gerald Ford.
- Herbert Hans Haupt, German-born naturalized U.S. citizen, was convicted of treason in 1942 and executed after being named as a German spy by fellow German spies defecting to the United States.
- Martin James Monti, United States Army Air Force pilot, convicted of treason for defecting to the Waffen SS in 1944.
- Robert Henry Best, convicted of treason on April 16, 1948 and served a life sentence.
- Mildred Gillars, also known as "Axis Sally", convicted of treason on March 8, 1949; served 12 years of a 10- to 30-year prison sentence.
- Tomoya Kawakita, sentenced to death for treason in 1952, but eventually released by President John F. Kennedy to be deported to Japan.
- Adam Yahiye Gadahn has been indicted for treason as of 2012, but has not been brought to trial as he remains at large.
Monday, November 12, 2012
Obama Log #1: "Fiscal Cliff Looming?"
This will be my first of many (possibly thousands) of short posts on SickBias.com where I will log events, facts and news reports that support my theories of Barack Obama being a horrible choice for president, especially when you consider Mitt Romney was our alternative.
Today's topic is "The Fiscal Cliff"
Forbes does a good enough job explaining what exactly the fiscal cliff is in their article in this link, but what leaves me scratching my head is this simple question: If this problem is so important just days after the presidential election that both FoxNews and MSNBC have the topic dominating their coverage then why was this issue never brought up during the campaign season? Were they so distracted that they are just now thinking of this? Experts all agree that the fiscal cliff is going to directly effect the American economy, so why then in a presidential campaign that seemed to revolve around the phrase, "It's the economy, stupid!" did this suddenly-so-important topic get left out?
Some may argue that all those people most concerned with the economy were certain that Romney was going to win, and a President Romney would have fixed problems like this, just as he fixed budget problems in both the state of Massachusetts and the Olympics in 2004, Salt Lake City. But he is not, and will not be our fiscal savior, so all of the sudden this has become a major issue. Well that's just pathetic. It should have been part of our choice on election day - a vote for Obama is a vote for sending America off a cliff. It was withheld from the voters. We were no more informed in 2012 than we were when we voted for the stranger nobody knew about in 2008.
So for this first Obama Log, I would like to sum up by sarcastically saying thank you to all the Obama voters for putting us in this crisis. Because we all know good and well that an election of the successful businessman and former successful governor of Massachusetts would not have resulted in the domination of a "Fiscal Cliff" in the headlines. So if the "fiscal cliff" is such an important issue then why didn't you just cut out the middle man and support Romney for president?
Today's topic is "The Fiscal Cliff"
Forbes does a good enough job explaining what exactly the fiscal cliff is in their article in this link, but what leaves me scratching my head is this simple question: If this problem is so important just days after the presidential election that both FoxNews and MSNBC have the topic dominating their coverage then why was this issue never brought up during the campaign season? Were they so distracted that they are just now thinking of this? Experts all agree that the fiscal cliff is going to directly effect the American economy, so why then in a presidential campaign that seemed to revolve around the phrase, "It's the economy, stupid!" did this suddenly-so-important topic get left out?
Some may argue that all those people most concerned with the economy were certain that Romney was going to win, and a President Romney would have fixed problems like this, just as he fixed budget problems in both the state of Massachusetts and the Olympics in 2004, Salt Lake City. But he is not, and will not be our fiscal savior, so all of the sudden this has become a major issue. Well that's just pathetic. It should have been part of our choice on election day - a vote for Obama is a vote for sending America off a cliff. It was withheld from the voters. We were no more informed in 2012 than we were when we voted for the stranger nobody knew about in 2008.
So for this first Obama Log, I would like to sum up by sarcastically saying thank you to all the Obama voters for putting us in this crisis. Because we all know good and well that an election of the successful businessman and former successful governor of Massachusetts would not have resulted in the domination of a "Fiscal Cliff" in the headlines. So if the "fiscal cliff" is such an important issue then why didn't you just cut out the middle man and support Romney for president?
Take a moment to thank a Veteran
I pledge Allegiances to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which its stands, One Nation under God indivisible with Liberty and Justice for All.
Saturday, November 10, 2012
I'm Really Not a Conspiracy Theorist, But...
If any of you reading this are true conspiracy theorists, please don't try to friend me. I generally don't get along with your types because the way you connect dots is ridiculous, your facts are usually made up and your conclusions are at best leaps of faith.
That being said, why did gas go up $0.42 in one single jump at all gas stations at midnight the night of election November 6, 2012? I'm sorry I don't have before and after pictures. It wouldn't even be believable. I never subscribed to the all-powerful, secret "Gas Price Czar" that sends down orders to all gas stations what the prices are to be, but after last Wednesday, there cannot be any other explanation that He exists and that Obama had corrupted this mystery man to help get him elected. The thing is, gas price spikes and dips are very predictable. When oil goes up, gas follows one to two weeks. When oil goes down, oil follows. When there is a problem in the Middle East, gas spikes up pretty quickly - usually within a couple of days. When there is a hurricane in an area that has off-shore drilling, there is usually a pretty quick spike in price. But Hurricane Sandy did the opposite. Before Sandy hit, oil refineries were shut down so gas production stopped, but there was so much devastation, that gas demand dropped enough to cause gas to go down. We saw this. It happened as expected. Gas in my neighborhood gradually dropped from $3.49 all the way down to $3.07 over the course of about a week immediately after Sandy hit. Late Tuesday evening, gas was between $3.07-3.09 at all gas stations. Very early Wednesday morning, gas at my local station was $3.49. Now NORMALLY when gas moves that much that quickly there is ALWAYS another station nearby that still has the old price. Not every gas station changes at the exact same time - in fact I've seen spans of up to 36 hours where nearby stations have not yet adjusted to a major change in gas prices.
Not Wednesday after the election. With absolutely zero warning, nothing in the news, no change in oil price, no terrorist attacks and no new hurricanes or any other news that would warrant a significant change in gas price, every single gas station, all within several hours (maybe minutes) popped their price by 40-42 cents. Am I the only one that feels like there is something very fishy about that?
In other conspiracy news, can someone explain to me why more Mormons would vote for John McCain in 2008 than for the Mormon, Mitt Romney in 2012? Please find a plausible explanation for this apparent fact...
That being said, why did gas go up $0.42 in one single jump at all gas stations at midnight the night of election November 6, 2012? I'm sorry I don't have before and after pictures. It wouldn't even be believable. I never subscribed to the all-powerful, secret "Gas Price Czar" that sends down orders to all gas stations what the prices are to be, but after last Wednesday, there cannot be any other explanation that He exists and that Obama had corrupted this mystery man to help get him elected. The thing is, gas price spikes and dips are very predictable. When oil goes up, gas follows one to two weeks. When oil goes down, oil follows. When there is a problem in the Middle East, gas spikes up pretty quickly - usually within a couple of days. When there is a hurricane in an area that has off-shore drilling, there is usually a pretty quick spike in price. But Hurricane Sandy did the opposite. Before Sandy hit, oil refineries were shut down so gas production stopped, but there was so much devastation, that gas demand dropped enough to cause gas to go down. We saw this. It happened as expected. Gas in my neighborhood gradually dropped from $3.49 all the way down to $3.07 over the course of about a week immediately after Sandy hit. Late Tuesday evening, gas was between $3.07-3.09 at all gas stations. Very early Wednesday morning, gas at my local station was $3.49. Now NORMALLY when gas moves that much that quickly there is ALWAYS another station nearby that still has the old price. Not every gas station changes at the exact same time - in fact I've seen spans of up to 36 hours where nearby stations have not yet adjusted to a major change in gas prices.Not Wednesday after the election. With absolutely zero warning, nothing in the news, no change in oil price, no terrorist attacks and no new hurricanes or any other news that would warrant a significant change in gas price, every single gas station, all within several hours (maybe minutes) popped their price by 40-42 cents. Am I the only one that feels like there is something very fishy about that?
In other conspiracy news, can someone explain to me why more Mormons would vote for John McCain in 2008 than for the Mormon, Mitt Romney in 2012? Please find a plausible explanation for this apparent fact...
Will She Survive?
My mother was bitten by a deadly snake a while ago. While her health was failing due to the venom coursing through her body, a doctor came running with a single vile of the antidote. He tripped and fell, smashing the bottle to the ground. Now my mother is at the fate of her own body being able to power through and rid it of this deadly toxin, or die trying.
This is an honest-to-God true story...
if by "mother" I mean "country,"
if by "bitten by a" I mean "plagued by the election of,"
if by "deadly snake" I mean "Barack Obama,"
if by "a while ago" I mean "four years ago,"
if by "health" I mean "economy,"
if by "venom" I mean "socialism,"
if by "coursing through her body" I mean "being implemented,"
if by "a doctor" I mean "American patriots,"
if by "a single vile of antidote" I mean "candidates Romney and Ryan,"
if by "he tripped and fell" I mean "the concerned citizens failed on election day,"
if by "smashing the bottle to the ground" I mean "eliminating any hope of reversing the effects of socialism being implemented,"
if by "her own body" I mean "the strength and will of freedom loving Americans."
This is an honest-to-God true story...
if by "mother" I mean "country,"
if by "bitten by a" I mean "plagued by the election of,"
if by "deadly snake" I mean "Barack Obama,"
if by "a while ago" I mean "four years ago,"
if by "health" I mean "economy,"
if by "venom" I mean "socialism,"
if by "coursing through her body" I mean "being implemented,"
if by "a doctor" I mean "American patriots,"
if by "a single vile of antidote" I mean "candidates Romney and Ryan,"
if by "he tripped and fell" I mean "the concerned citizens failed on election day,"
if by "smashing the bottle to the ground" I mean "eliminating any hope of reversing the effects of socialism being implemented,"
if by "her own body" I mean "the strength and will of freedom loving Americans."
Will she survive?
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Black American Republicans ?
Yes i know the title of this may be a bit provocative but,
Why would a Black American want to be or vote for a republican ?
Answer:
Top 10 reasons to be or vote Republican - Capitalist - Conservative.
1. belief and love for large families
2. Support life, not abortion
3. Choose the best school for your child even private school paid for by the tax payers.
4. Hard work and persistence always pays off, you are rewarded for your work ethic.
5. Personal responsibility builds confidence and encourages massive success.
6. Start your own business its easy because of minimal regulations and SBA Loans.
7. Enjoy a booming economy because of "Capitalism"
8. Republicans have promoted more Black Americans to higher political positions
9. Produced more Black CEO's in all of American history.
10. Cost of living is lower due to small government and smaller taxes.
The following is a list of Political Black Republicans:
A
Claude Allen, former White House Domestic Policy Advisor
Renee Amoore, health care advocate & founder and president of The Amoore Group, Inc.; former candidate for Republican National Committee Co-Chairwoman
Caesar Antoine, 13th Lieutenant Governor of Louisiana
B
J. Kenneth Blackwell, former Secretary of State of Ohio, former gubernatorial candidate
Michelle Bernard, journalist, author, columnist
Lynette Boggs, former Las Vegas City Councilwoman, former Clark County, NV commissioner, former candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives
Peter Boulware, former NFL linebacker and Republican candidate for the Florida House of Representatives, District 9.
Jennette Bradley, former Treasurer of the State of Ohio
Edward Brooke, former U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, first African American elected by popular vote to the U.S. Senate
Stephen Broden, conservative commentator, Life Always board member (a pro-life organization) and evangelical pastor, 2010 Congressional candidate
Janice Rogers Brown, a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals
Blanche Bruce, former U.S. Senator from Mississippi, first African American to serve a full term in the U.S. Senate
Keith Butler, Republican national committeeman from Michigan, former councilman for Detroit, minister and former U.S. Senatorial candidate
C
Herman Cain
Herman Cain, businessman, media personality, and former candidate for President of the United States in 2012.
Jennifer Carroll, Lieutenant Governor of Florida[1]
Ron Christie, former advisor to Vice-President Dick Cheney[2]
Octavius Valentine Catto, civil rights activist and African American baseball pioneer
Henry P. Cheatham, former U.S. Representative from North Carolina
Eldridge Cleaver, author and civil rights leader
William Thaddeus Coleman, Jr., fourth United States Secretary of Transportation, first African American Supreme Court Clerk[3]
Ward Connerly, political activist, businessman, and former University of California Regent
Norris Wright Cuney, Chairman of the Texas Republican Party (1886-1896)
D
Frederick Douglass
Randy Daniels, former Secretary of State of New York, 2006 Gubernatorial candidate
Artur Davis, former Democratic Alabama Congressman, speaker at 2012 Republican National Convention, potential Republican candidate
Oscar Stanton de Priest, former U.S. Representative from Illinois
Robert DeLarge, South Carolina congressman
Frederick Douglass, abolitionist, editor, orator, author, and statesman
Oscar Dunn, 11th Lieutenant Governor of Louisiana
Edward Duplex, Mayor of Wheatland, California (1888)
E
Larry Elder, talk radio host and commentator
Robert Brown Elliott, former U.S. Representative from South Carolina
Melvin H. Evans, former U.S. Representative from, and former Governor of, the U.S. Virgin Islands
F
James L. Farmer, Jr., civil rights leader
Michel Faulkner, pastor, former defensive lineman for the New York Jets, a 2010 nominee for New York's 15th congressional district
Arthur Fletcher, official in the administrations of Presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and George H.W. Bush; considered the "father of affirmative action"
Gary Franks, former U.S. Representative from Connecticut
Ryan Frazier, Aurora City Councilman, 2010 nominee for Colorado's 7th congressional district
Samuel B. Fuller, founder and president of the Fuller Products Company, publisher of the New York Age and Pittsburgh Courier, head of the South Side Chicago NAACP, president of the National Negro Business League, and a prominent black Republican
Virginia Fuller, 2010 and 2012 Congressional Candidate
G
James Garner (politician), former mayor of the Village of Hempstead, New York, 2004 Congressional candidate
Robert A. George (pundit), editorial writer for the New York Post, blogger and pundit
James Golden (radio personality), producer on the Rush Limbaugh radio talk show
H
Ken Hamblin, Radio host, political commentator, author, television personality
Jeremiah Haralson, former U.S. Representative from Alabama
Bill Hardiman, former Michigan State Senator, 2010 Congressional Candidate
Erika Harold, 2003 Miss America, delegate to the 2004 Republican National Convention, 2012 Congressional Candidate
Ted Hayes, activist for the homeless
Amy Holmes, CNN political commentator and independent social conservative
Deborah Honeycutt, 2006, 2008, 2010 congressional candidate;
T.R.M. Howard, Mississippi civil rights leader, surgeon, entrepreneur and mentor to Medgar Evers and Fannie Lou Hamer
Zora Neale Hurston, Folklorist, anthropologist, novelist, short story writer
John Adams Hyman, former U.S. Representative from North Carolina
I
Niger Innis, commentator and activist
J
Alphonso Jackson, thirteenth Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Raynard Jackson, political consultant and political analyst for WUSA*9 TV (CBS affiliate) in Washington, DC
Dr. Mildred Fay Jefferson, first African-American woman to graduate from Harvard Medical School; pro-life movement leader; Republican candidate for U.S. House and U.S. Senate[4]
Wallace B. Jefferson, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas
James Weldon Johnson, first Black manager of the NAACP, president of the Colored Republican Club
K
Alan Keyes, 16th Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs
Alan Keyes, former member of the Republican party and nominee for the U.S. Senate
Alveda King, minister, political activist, author, niece of Martin Luther King Jr.
Martin Luther King, Sr., Reverend, missionary, civil rights leader, father of Martin Luther King, Jr.
L
Stephen N. Lackey, fundraiser, philanthropist
John Mercer Langston, former U.S. Representative from Virginia
Jefferson Franklin Long, former U.S. Representative from Georgia
Mia Love, mayor of Saratoga Springs, Utah, 2012 Congressional candidate
John Roy Lynch, former U.S. Representative from Mississippi
M
Lenny McAllister, political analyst, community activist, and author
Angela McGlowan, political analyst, 2010 Congressional candidate
James Meredith, civil rights leader
Thomas Ezekiel Miller, former U.S. Representative from South Carolina
Eric Motley, former Deputy Associate Director, Office of Presidential Personnel in Bush Administration
George Washington Murray, former U.S. Representative from South Carolina
E. Frederic Morrow, first African-American to hold an executive position at the White House. He served under President Dwight D. Eisenhower as Administrative Officer for Special Projects from 1955 to 1961.
Steven Mullins, Connecticut politician, Planning & Zoning Commissioner, City of West Haven, 2009 Republican nominee for Mayor of West Haven, 2002 Republican nominee for State Comptroller
N
Charles Edmund Nash, former U.S Representative from Louisiana
Sophia A. Nelson, Lawyer, author, political commentator
Constance Berry Newman, U.S. diplomat; former Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs; member of International Republican Institute
O
James E. O'Hara, Congressman from North Carolina
P
Colin Powell, 65th Secretary of State
Rod Paige, seventh U.S. Secretary of Education
Sherman Parker, Missouri state representative, ran for U.S. House of Representatives
Vernon Parker, mayor of Paradise Valley, Arizona, 2010 Congressional candidate
Star Parker, author, political commentator, 2010 Congressional candidate
Edward J. Perkins, first African-American U.S. ambassador to South Africa
Jesse Lee Peterson, civil rights activist, founder of Brotherhood of New Destiny
Joseph C. Phillips, actor, columnist, commentator
Pio Pico, last governor of Mexican California. Formed the Republican Party in California.[5]
Samuel Pierce, former HUD Secretary
P. B. S. Pinchback, twenty-fourth governor of Louisiana; first African-American governor of a U.S. state
Colin Powell, 65th United States Secretary of State
Michael Powell, 24th Chairman of the FCC
Pierre-Richard Prosper, former Bush Administration war crimes official
Q
Wiki letter w.svg This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (July 2010)
R
Condoleezza Rice, 66th Secretary of State
Joseph H. Rainey, former U.S. Representative from South Carolina, first African American to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives
James T. Rapier, former U.S. Representative from Alabama
Hiram Rhodes Revels, former U.S. Senator from Mississippi, first African American to serve in the U.S. Senate
Condoleezza Rice, 66th United States Secretary of State
Jack E. Robinson III, former party nominee for U.S. House, U.S. Senate, and Secretary of the Commonwealth in Massachusetts
Vernon Robinson, former candidate for U.S. House of Representatives from North Carolina
Joe Rogers, former Lieutenant Governor of Colorado, youngest Lieutenant Governor in Colorado history
Carson Ross Mayor of Blue Springs, MO, Fmr. Missouri State Rep
Jackie Robinson, baseball player (changed parties after Goldwater nomination).
S
Michael Steele, 64th Chairman of the Republican National Committee
Paul H. Scott, Michigan State Representative
Tim Scott. Representative, South Carolina's 1st Congressional District
Marvin Scott. Congressional Candidate
Winsome Sears. Former member of the Virginia House of Delegates, 2004 Congressional Candidate
Robert Smalls, South Carolina
Joshua I. Smith, appointed commissioner of Minority Business Development by President George H. W. Bush
Princella Smith, 2010 Congressional Candidate, She PAC member
DeForest "Buster" Soaries, former New Jersey Secretary of State
Thomas Sowell, economist, writer and commentator
Michael S. Steele, political commentator, former Lieutenant Governor of Maryland, former candidate for the U.S. Senate and elected chairman of the Republican National Committee
Shelby Steele, author
Thomas Stith, III, former member of the city council of Durham, North Carolina, 2004 Candidate for Lieutenant Governor, 2007 mayoral candidate for Durham, North Carolina
Lynn Swann, former NFL player, former Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate
T
Clarence Thomas, Associate Supreme Court Justice
Sojourner Truth
Noel C. Taylor, mayor of Roanoke, Virginia from 1975 to 1992[6]
Clarence Thomas, associate justice of the United States Supreme Court
Thurman Thomas, former Buffalo Bill, Republican activist, supported and campaigned for 2010 New York Republican Gubernatorial nominee Carl Paladino
Sojourner Truth, abolitionist speaker and suffrage advocate
Harriet Tubman, abolitionist speaker and suffrage advocate
Benjamin S. Turner, Alabama Congressman
David Tyree, former New York Giant, anti-same-sex marriage advocate
U
James L. Usry, former mayor of Atlantic City, New Jersey
V
William T. Vernon, Register of the Treasury under President Theodore Roosevelt[7]
W
Dale Wainwright, Associate Justice of the Texas Supreme Court
Eric Wallace (entrepreneur), pastor, entrepreneur, serves on the African American Advisory Board for the Republican National Committee
Josiah Walls, former U.S. Representative from Florida, and one of the first African-Americans to serve in the U.S. House
Booker T. Washington, educator and activist
Maurice Washington, Nevada State Senator
J. C. Watts, former U.S. Representative from Oklahoma
Ida B. Wells, civil rights advocate, co-founder of the NAACP
Allen West, Representative, U.S. House of Representatives (FL-22)
J. Ernest Wilkins, Sr., Assistant Secretary of Labor under President Eisenhower[8]
Armstrong Williams, radio and television commentator
Michael L. Williams, Texas Railroad Commissioner
Walter E. Williams, author, commentator, economist
Vern Williams, member of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
Barb Davis White, 2010 Congressional Candidate
Y
William F. Yardley, anti-segregation advocate, first African American candidate for governor of Tennessee (1876)
Z
Why would a Black American want to be or vote for a republican ?
Answer:
Top 10 reasons to be or vote Republican - Capitalist - Conservative.
1. belief and love for large families
2. Support life, not abortion
3. Choose the best school for your child even private school paid for by the tax payers.
4. Hard work and persistence always pays off, you are rewarded for your work ethic.
5. Personal responsibility builds confidence and encourages massive success.
6. Start your own business its easy because of minimal regulations and SBA Loans.
7. Enjoy a booming economy because of "Capitalism"
8. Republicans have promoted more Black Americans to higher political positions
9. Produced more Black CEO's in all of American history.
10. Cost of living is lower due to small government and smaller taxes.
The following is a list of Political Black Republicans:
A
Claude Allen, former White House Domestic Policy Advisor
Renee Amoore, health care advocate & founder and president of The Amoore Group, Inc.; former candidate for Republican National Committee Co-Chairwoman
Caesar Antoine, 13th Lieutenant Governor of Louisiana
B
J. Kenneth Blackwell, former Secretary of State of Ohio, former gubernatorial candidate
Michelle Bernard, journalist, author, columnist
Lynette Boggs, former Las Vegas City Councilwoman, former Clark County, NV commissioner, former candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives
Peter Boulware, former NFL linebacker and Republican candidate for the Florida House of Representatives, District 9.
Jennette Bradley, former Treasurer of the State of Ohio
Edward Brooke, former U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, first African American elected by popular vote to the U.S. Senate
Stephen Broden, conservative commentator, Life Always board member (a pro-life organization) and evangelical pastor, 2010 Congressional candidate
Janice Rogers Brown, a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals
Blanche Bruce, former U.S. Senator from Mississippi, first African American to serve a full term in the U.S. Senate
Keith Butler, Republican national committeeman from Michigan, former councilman for Detroit, minister and former U.S. Senatorial candidate
C
Herman Cain
Herman Cain, businessman, media personality, and former candidate for President of the United States in 2012.
Jennifer Carroll, Lieutenant Governor of Florida[1]
Ron Christie, former advisor to Vice-President Dick Cheney[2]
Octavius Valentine Catto, civil rights activist and African American baseball pioneer
Henry P. Cheatham, former U.S. Representative from North Carolina
Eldridge Cleaver, author and civil rights leader
William Thaddeus Coleman, Jr., fourth United States Secretary of Transportation, first African American Supreme Court Clerk[3]
Ward Connerly, political activist, businessman, and former University of California Regent
Norris Wright Cuney, Chairman of the Texas Republican Party (1886-1896)
D
Frederick Douglass
Randy Daniels, former Secretary of State of New York, 2006 Gubernatorial candidate
Artur Davis, former Democratic Alabama Congressman, speaker at 2012 Republican National Convention, potential Republican candidate
Oscar Stanton de Priest, former U.S. Representative from Illinois
Robert DeLarge, South Carolina congressman
Frederick Douglass, abolitionist, editor, orator, author, and statesman
Oscar Dunn, 11th Lieutenant Governor of Louisiana
Edward Duplex, Mayor of Wheatland, California (1888)
E
Larry Elder, talk radio host and commentator
Robert Brown Elliott, former U.S. Representative from South Carolina
Melvin H. Evans, former U.S. Representative from, and former Governor of, the U.S. Virgin Islands
F
James L. Farmer, Jr., civil rights leader
Michel Faulkner, pastor, former defensive lineman for the New York Jets, a 2010 nominee for New York's 15th congressional district
Arthur Fletcher, official in the administrations of Presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and George H.W. Bush; considered the "father of affirmative action"
Gary Franks, former U.S. Representative from Connecticut
Ryan Frazier, Aurora City Councilman, 2010 nominee for Colorado's 7th congressional district
Samuel B. Fuller, founder and president of the Fuller Products Company, publisher of the New York Age and Pittsburgh Courier, head of the South Side Chicago NAACP, president of the National Negro Business League, and a prominent black Republican
Virginia Fuller, 2010 and 2012 Congressional Candidate
G
James Garner (politician), former mayor of the Village of Hempstead, New York, 2004 Congressional candidate
Robert A. George (pundit), editorial writer for the New York Post, blogger and pundit
James Golden (radio personality), producer on the Rush Limbaugh radio talk show
H
Ken Hamblin, Radio host, political commentator, author, television personality
Jeremiah Haralson, former U.S. Representative from Alabama
Bill Hardiman, former Michigan State Senator, 2010 Congressional Candidate
Erika Harold, 2003 Miss America, delegate to the 2004 Republican National Convention, 2012 Congressional Candidate
Ted Hayes, activist for the homeless
Amy Holmes, CNN political commentator and independent social conservative
Deborah Honeycutt, 2006, 2008, 2010 congressional candidate;
T.R.M. Howard, Mississippi civil rights leader, surgeon, entrepreneur and mentor to Medgar Evers and Fannie Lou Hamer
Zora Neale Hurston, Folklorist, anthropologist, novelist, short story writer
John Adams Hyman, former U.S. Representative from North Carolina
I
Niger Innis, commentator and activist
J
Alphonso Jackson, thirteenth Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Raynard Jackson, political consultant and political analyst for WUSA*9 TV (CBS affiliate) in Washington, DC
Dr. Mildred Fay Jefferson, first African-American woman to graduate from Harvard Medical School; pro-life movement leader; Republican candidate for U.S. House and U.S. Senate[4]
Wallace B. Jefferson, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas
James Weldon Johnson, first Black manager of the NAACP, president of the Colored Republican Club
K
Alan Keyes, 16th Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs
Alan Keyes, former member of the Republican party and nominee for the U.S. Senate
Alveda King, minister, political activist, author, niece of Martin Luther King Jr.
Martin Luther King, Sr., Reverend, missionary, civil rights leader, father of Martin Luther King, Jr.
L
Stephen N. Lackey, fundraiser, philanthropist
John Mercer Langston, former U.S. Representative from Virginia
Jefferson Franklin Long, former U.S. Representative from Georgia
Mia Love, mayor of Saratoga Springs, Utah, 2012 Congressional candidate
John Roy Lynch, former U.S. Representative from Mississippi
M
Lenny McAllister, political analyst, community activist, and author
Angela McGlowan, political analyst, 2010 Congressional candidate
James Meredith, civil rights leader
Thomas Ezekiel Miller, former U.S. Representative from South Carolina
Eric Motley, former Deputy Associate Director, Office of Presidential Personnel in Bush Administration
George Washington Murray, former U.S. Representative from South Carolina
E. Frederic Morrow, first African-American to hold an executive position at the White House. He served under President Dwight D. Eisenhower as Administrative Officer for Special Projects from 1955 to 1961.
Steven Mullins, Connecticut politician, Planning & Zoning Commissioner, City of West Haven, 2009 Republican nominee for Mayor of West Haven, 2002 Republican nominee for State Comptroller
N
Charles Edmund Nash, former U.S Representative from Louisiana
Sophia A. Nelson, Lawyer, author, political commentator
Constance Berry Newman, U.S. diplomat; former Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs; member of International Republican Institute
O
James E. O'Hara, Congressman from North Carolina
P
Colin Powell, 65th Secretary of State
Rod Paige, seventh U.S. Secretary of Education
Sherman Parker, Missouri state representative, ran for U.S. House of Representatives
Vernon Parker, mayor of Paradise Valley, Arizona, 2010 Congressional candidate
Star Parker, author, political commentator, 2010 Congressional candidate
Edward J. Perkins, first African-American U.S. ambassador to South Africa
Jesse Lee Peterson, civil rights activist, founder of Brotherhood of New Destiny
Joseph C. Phillips, actor, columnist, commentator
Pio Pico, last governor of Mexican California. Formed the Republican Party in California.[5]
Samuel Pierce, former HUD Secretary
P. B. S. Pinchback, twenty-fourth governor of Louisiana; first African-American governor of a U.S. state
Colin Powell, 65th United States Secretary of State
Michael Powell, 24th Chairman of the FCC
Pierre-Richard Prosper, former Bush Administration war crimes official
Q
Wiki letter w.svg This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (July 2010)
R
Condoleezza Rice, 66th Secretary of State
Joseph H. Rainey, former U.S. Representative from South Carolina, first African American to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives
James T. Rapier, former U.S. Representative from Alabama
Hiram Rhodes Revels, former U.S. Senator from Mississippi, first African American to serve in the U.S. Senate
Condoleezza Rice, 66th United States Secretary of State
Jack E. Robinson III, former party nominee for U.S. House, U.S. Senate, and Secretary of the Commonwealth in Massachusetts
Vernon Robinson, former candidate for U.S. House of Representatives from North Carolina
Joe Rogers, former Lieutenant Governor of Colorado, youngest Lieutenant Governor in Colorado history
Carson Ross Mayor of Blue Springs, MO, Fmr. Missouri State Rep
Jackie Robinson, baseball player (changed parties after Goldwater nomination).
S
Michael Steele, 64th Chairman of the Republican National Committee
Paul H. Scott, Michigan State Representative
Tim Scott. Representative, South Carolina's 1st Congressional District
Marvin Scott. Congressional Candidate
Winsome Sears. Former member of the Virginia House of Delegates, 2004 Congressional Candidate
Robert Smalls, South Carolina
Joshua I. Smith, appointed commissioner of Minority Business Development by President George H. W. Bush
Princella Smith, 2010 Congressional Candidate, She PAC member
DeForest "Buster" Soaries, former New Jersey Secretary of State
Thomas Sowell, economist, writer and commentator
Michael S. Steele, political commentator, former Lieutenant Governor of Maryland, former candidate for the U.S. Senate and elected chairman of the Republican National Committee
Shelby Steele, author
Thomas Stith, III, former member of the city council of Durham, North Carolina, 2004 Candidate for Lieutenant Governor, 2007 mayoral candidate for Durham, North Carolina
Lynn Swann, former NFL player, former Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate
T
Clarence Thomas, Associate Supreme Court Justice
Sojourner Truth
Noel C. Taylor, mayor of Roanoke, Virginia from 1975 to 1992[6]
Clarence Thomas, associate justice of the United States Supreme Court
Thurman Thomas, former Buffalo Bill, Republican activist, supported and campaigned for 2010 New York Republican Gubernatorial nominee Carl Paladino
Sojourner Truth, abolitionist speaker and suffrage advocate
Harriet Tubman, abolitionist speaker and suffrage advocate
Benjamin S. Turner, Alabama Congressman
David Tyree, former New York Giant, anti-same-sex marriage advocate
U
James L. Usry, former mayor of Atlantic City, New Jersey
V
William T. Vernon, Register of the Treasury under President Theodore Roosevelt[7]
W
Dale Wainwright, Associate Justice of the Texas Supreme Court
Eric Wallace (entrepreneur), pastor, entrepreneur, serves on the African American Advisory Board for the Republican National Committee
Josiah Walls, former U.S. Representative from Florida, and one of the first African-Americans to serve in the U.S. House
Booker T. Washington, educator and activist
Maurice Washington, Nevada State Senator
J. C. Watts, former U.S. Representative from Oklahoma
Ida B. Wells, civil rights advocate, co-founder of the NAACP
Allen West, Representative, U.S. House of Representatives (FL-22)
J. Ernest Wilkins, Sr., Assistant Secretary of Labor under President Eisenhower[8]
Armstrong Williams, radio and television commentator
Michael L. Williams, Texas Railroad Commissioner
Walter E. Williams, author, commentator, economist
Vern Williams, member of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
Barb Davis White, 2010 Congressional Candidate
Y
William F. Yardley, anti-segregation advocate, first African American candidate for governor of Tennessee (1876)
Z
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)