Rupert Murdoch Under Fire for MidEast Tweet

Rupert Murdoch Under Fire for MidEast Tweet: ‘Can’t Obama Stop His Friends in Egypt Shelling Israel?’

  

It blows my mind how Jews in America can continue to vote Democrat when the very party they are voting for is throwing them under the bus.  

Wake up everyone who is of Jewish decent - the democrats do not care about you what so ever. They are throwing your homeland under the bus along with you.  Take a stand against Democrats and Socialism.    

Brian.   

Sick bias in Yahoo! and AP article against Israel

In case you have been living under a rock, Hamas in the Gaza Strip and Israelis have been firing rockets at each other in what appears to be an escalating fight that could soon be considered an all-out war, especially if ground fighting commences. While the following AP article by Ian Deitch and Ibrahim Barzak, featured on the front page of Yahoo.com is not the first example of anti-Semitic bias coming from liberal journalists, I just felt the need to point it out to you. Please read the article here. 

This article left me with the false impression that the big bad bullies are purposefully avoiding diplomacy in order to use excessive and unprovoked force on a defenseless little group of civilians and other non-military targets. The authors made gratuitous use of the word "offensive" to drive home his point. This isn't an offensive as much as it is a response, but it wasn't until the sixth paragraph that it was pointed out:

"Israel launched the operation on Wednesday in what it said was an effort to end months of rocket fire out of the Hamas-ruled territory. It began the offensive with an unexpected airstrike that killed Hamas' powerful military chief, and since then has relentlessly targeted suspected rocket launchers and storage sites."

After this brief random act of journalism, the author quickly snapped back to liberal "victim" mode by mentioning the disparity between the dead and wounded of the Palestinians verses the Israelis, highlighting the civilian numbers.

How about this for warmongering: When Maj. Gen. Tal Russo, Israel's southern commander was "asked whether Israel is ready to send ground troops into Gaza, he said: 'Absolutely.'"

Words matter. This sentence sounds like Tal Russo is definitely going to invade, and trust me, the authors desperately hope you think so, to further the narrative of the "bullies" being warmongers. But he wasn't asked if he was going to invade. He was asked if he was READY to send troops. Even if he wasn't ready to invade he would have been obligated to say he was. This was a trick question in order to get the reader to believe something other than what was really meant.

Then here is the Big Whopper lie in the article:

"The White House said President Barack Obama was also in touch with the Egyptian and Turkish leaders. The U.S. has solidly backed Israel so far."

That is a boldface LIE. The truth is that the U.S. has been solidly backing Israel since the beginning all the way up until we elected a Commander-in-Chief that turned out to be clearly anti-Semitic in 2008. There has been a clear reversal of the above statement since Barack Obama took office with every action he has ever taken. Listen to Michael Savage talk about the last time Israel's Prime Minister had a chance to visit America:

Then the authors unwittingly give support to my belief that an Obama Administration led U.S. is NOT backing Israel by writing this"

"Speaking on Air Force One, deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said that the White House believes Israel "has the right to defend itself" against attack and that the Israelis will make their own decisions about their "military tactics and operations."

Translation: Israel, you are on your own.

To put an exclamation point on my belief that the U.S. sadly no longer backs Israel, the authors end the article with this paragraph:

"[Egypt's President] Morsi warned that a ground operation by Irael will have 'repercussions' across the region. 'All must realize the situation is different than before, and the people of the region now are different than before and the leaders are different than before,' he said at a joint press conference with Turkey's Islamist prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Erdogan, like Morsi, leads an Islamist government that has chilly diplomatic ties with Israel."

Translation: Neither George W. Bush or Mitt Romney can save you now.

I'm not really sure why these authors put the lie into this article. Maybe they are merely just mistaken? Considering the pro-Hamas bias in the article, I am left to conclude that by believing the U.S. has Israel's back, it makes them look even more like bullies than they are already made out to be. It could also be that since the authors are liberal and pro-Hamas, that they must also hate the U.S. and that if they subscribe to the old adage that an enemy of my enemy is my friend, then the reverse must be true. In other words, since Israel is the authors' enemy, and the U.S. is the authors' enemy, then Israel and the U.S. must still be friends. Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.

Israel Intercepts Gaza Rocket Aimed at Tel Aviv

The Blaze Reports : Full Story

Footage from Associated Press Television News shows a plume of smoke emanating from an Iron Dome battery deployed in Tel Aviv followed by a flash of light overhead as the rocket is intercepted. People huddled along Tel Aviv’s beachfront boardwalk cheered as the interception took place. Air raid sirens had sounded to warn residents to take cover.

The "Red" Coats are Coming and Obamas Master Plan

  Its not enough for me to say wake the hell up any more, because you must now wake your stupid neighbor.

  Communism is a disease that will cause hallucinations into sick twisted beliefs of media bias and non-sense that will eventually be the cause of your own early demise. Communism is a slow acting disease that doesn't take hold over night, it usually takes years and sometime decades before its completely irreversible.  It starts with agreeing that its ok for the Government to tax and spend into prosperity and to have more and more control over the states and their people.  Another sign is when you start to agree with the democrate party and watching MSNBC.
   When you see Democrats and Unions pushing for the good of everyone you are on the path to Communism.  They will convenience you that they know better how to spend your money than you do.  The Government will start to give Giant auto makers and Banks your hard earned tax dollars to keep them open for business when in reality their tragic decisions would have sunk any random business.  Governments and Unions will convince employees that they should tell the CEO of their company how to run his business because the CEO does nothing all day but play golf.  CEO's dont know what it takes to run a company but the employees do. 

  Unions have become completely communist and they will pay politians to pass laws that give them more and more power.  For example if the Unions want to spend millions of employee dollars to support Obama there is nothing anyone can do about it.  Unions vote Democrat 95% of the time and there is always an agenda for that, to push closer and closer into communism.  Democrats ! why democrate ? Because they are both on the same path with the same agenda.  Give all the power to the government and the more they control your lives the longer the stay in power.  Look at Russia in the last 100 years and you can see a perfect time line and excellent results of Communism.

We must begin by taking back our schools where the unions have been indoctrinating them for decades.  Why would obama send his kids to private schools ? Because he knows that public schools are in place to keep our children stupid and to not teach them about how to be successful in life.  obama knows that if he can keep 51% of the people in America stupid then he will always win.
Capitalism will save you from communism.

Obama: "Thank you, Satan!"

Mass Exodus of Jobs in America

  In order to create a new job a few things must come into play in order for this to happen.

1.  Healthy and growing economy
2. Augmentation of New Business
3. Expanding business to match consumer demand
4. Business Owner confidence in expansion

  So if you think about it business starts with Entrepreneurship and grows because of supply and demand from the consumer.  Government plays a key role because it will directly effect a business by regulation or deregulation. 
The best example of this in our history is during Ronald Reagan's presidency.  Reagan enacted lower marginal tax rates in conjunction with simplified income tax codes and continued deregulation.
What this means is that the Government got out of the way of Business to grow and prosper which actually created more jobs, more millionaires, and greater consumer and business confidence.  Lower taxes created more money for the Government as well because consumers and business had more money and didnt look for ways to evade taxes.  

Remember when you first got cable t.v. and were able to watch MTV or HBO ?  Stop and think for on minute and understand that the cable t.v. BOOM was because of one simple thing Reagan enacted...  DEREGULATION of the telephone and cable line.  In 1984, Congress passed the Cable Communications Policy Act. This created millions of new jobs and new inventions as well as new business and the American people were the beneficiary of deregulation.  It was so easy to get a job during the 1980's and 1990's.

What is going on in America today that is making it so hard to get a job ? 

1. Corporate bankruptcy has soared during Obama administration and no net growth.
2. New business filings are non-exsistant
3. Consumer demand is down due to many factors including 15% unemployment 
4. Obama HATES business owners and ran against them in his reelection and in the first week of his reelection he enacted over 6,100 new regulations.  

We need to get back to what the founding father believed which was small federal government and that the power lies with the states. They revolted against Britain because of regulations and taxes and when you have a federal government that is spending deficit of $120 billion dollars in the month of October 2012 that's just absolutely insane. 

Revelations #1: A Misconception of Wealth Redistribution

I read a liberal comment today:

"What about the tax cuts that the GOP is so concerned about keeping for the wealthy. Romney lost because the working American people are tired of the upper economic classes getting the breaks when the people who do the work are always having to scrimp and scrape to get by. The Republicians always oppose what's going to help the average person. That's why Romney lost."

It got me thinking... What does this person think helps the average person? Well first of all it is something Republicans oppose. But digging a little deeper into this comment you'll see that he thinks the average person works harder than the wealthy. He says "people who do the work" are tired of breaks for the upper class, as if the upper class folks don't even work. Apparently the rich do nothing except vacation, golf and dine in fancy restaurants. Is this correct? Have you ever met a business owner? Can you even imagine the hours they work?

He also reveals his belief that tax cuts are some sort of a gift from the government to a recipient, in this case the wealthy. In fact, a big problem Republicans have is that liberals have successfully ingrained into the public that the word "CUT" in tax cuts is a NOUN while the naive Republicans still think its a VERB. In the public's mind, they didn't cut taxes, they handed out a cut of taxes, much like a cut of prime rib, or a slice of pie. By now you should know that the government doesn't create the wealth that they are handing out like desert. They have to take it from someone to redistribute, and quite frankly, I think this is the very definition of the socialism that leads directly to communism. But I digress...

So, what does this commenter think helps the average person? While most sane people think that this poster thinks that the average person just needs more money to make ends meet and live a little lit less stressed life, I believe this assumption is wrong. This commenter has shown his hand. It's not just the financial gap between the Haves and the Have-Nots.  It's also the perceived gap in the amount of labor performed!

So in conclusion, this poster has inadvertently revealed a subconscious goal that I would argue that most socialists share - to help the average person (i.e. "worker") by giving him or her a large enough "cut" of government money in order to close the perceived gap in the amount of work being done by the rich and the rest of us. In other words, they want to get paid to sit on their asses.