Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Federal Court Sides with Obama, Forces VA School to Let Transgender Student Choose Bathroom

Listen to Military Veteran Talk Radio iHeart.SmythRadio.com
Facebook.com/SmythRadio

The Associated Press

by WARNER TODD HUSTON20 Apr 2016Gloucester, VA481

This week a federal court sided with a transgender student who insisted that the Obama administration’s reading of federal Title IX rules would allow her to choose her own bathroom at her Virginia high school.

Gavin Grimm, 16, a student at Gloucester High School in Gloucester, Virginia, demanded the district allow her to use the boys restroom because she identifies as a male. School officials, though, denied the request in December.

After a period of public discussion, Gloucester school district officials decided in a 6-to-1 vote that school bathrooms should be used only by those students whose sex corresponds to the gender the facility is designated to serve.

But the student took the case to a federal court, citing federal Title IX sex discrimination rules. Grimm maintained that the federal government can force schools to allow transgender students to choose whatever bathroom they feel like using.

After hearing the case, in a 2-to-1 ruling the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the student, saying a lower court should have agreed with the student’s interpretation of the federal discrimination rules.

In a public statement the student said she felt “vindicated” by the newest ruling.

“Today’s decision gives me hope that my fight will help other kids avoid discriminatory treatment at school,” the student said.

In the same statement, the Virginia ACLU said the decision “reinforces” the Obama Department of Education’s interpretation of the policy.

“With this decision,” the VA ACLU said, “we hope that schools and legislators will finally get the message that excluding transgender kids from the restrooms is unlawful sex discrimination.”

The National Center for Transgender Equality also celebrated the ruling, saying the decision is “a very important decision that promotes fairness and dignity for all students.”

The Appeals Court ruling means that the original lower court will have to revisit its ruling to correspond to the upper court’s decision.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter@warnerthuston or email the author at igcolonel@hotmail.com

Read More Stories About:

Big GovernmentEducationSocial Justice,EducationACLUtitle ixtransgender bathroom billMy Transgender Kids

Monday, February 22, 2016

Craig Shirley: The GOP’s ‘Third Revolution’ Is The Future Of Reaganism


Listen to Military Veteran Talk Radio iHeart.SmythRadio.com

AP/Matt Rourke

by DAN RIEHL22 Feb 2016Washington, DC656

New York Times bestselling author and Reagan biographer Craig Shirley discussed his Breitbart article, “The Fall of the House of Bush” with Breitbart News Daily hosts Stephen K. Bannon and Alex Marlow on Sirius XM.

Shirley says:

The (Republican) Party is going through a third revolution. It went through one in 1964, went through a second in 1980 and now we’re witnessing a third revolution and it’s returning kind of to the future of Reaganism, of Reagan Federalism especially in the twenty-first century. … a vast majority of American people just absolutely despise Washington and they view it as a corrupt city on the Potomac River and not the end all and be all of the solutions to their problems. In fact, they view it as the instigator of their problems instead of the solver of their problems.


When asked who are the true revolutionaries today, as opposed to perhaps some elected Republican politicians endorsing Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), said Shirley, “It is Breitbart. It is NewsMax. It is websites and news organizations and politicians who have a true outsider cast. The problem with too many politicians like Nikki Haley, she doesn’t understand this, as soon as she became elected, she became part of the establishment. That’s just a given.”

He went on to point out Reagan as one of a very few politicians who were able to hold office, yet continue to be seen as an “outsider” of sorts.

Shirley characterized frontrunner Donald Trump as a threat to the establishment and said, “Any time someone is a threat to the establishment, they are going to be attacked … because the establishment likes being in power. And they like holding onto power and they like being in control.”

Shirley also echoed themes from his earlier Breitbart piece.

There is great meaning in Jeb Bush’s demise. This is not simply the loss of Carly Fiorina or Rick Santorum.

Jeb’s loss is the loss of an entire culture. It means the established order is waning, the donor class of the GOP no longer holds sway, and the power no longer resides with the party committees.

It means those writers and organizations and publications and individuals who subscribed to a New World Order and Big Government Republicanism are also in steep decline. It is yet another indications that the party is returning to the federalism of Ronald Reagan, to American conservatism. The party is going back to the future.


The entire interview can be heard below. Breitbart News Daily airs from 6AM-9AM EST on Sirius XM Patriot channel 125.

Read More Stories About:

Big Government2016 Presidential Race,Radio

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Seven Facts About the Black Panther Party Amid Beyoncé Super Bowl Tribute


Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images

by JEROME HUDSON8 Feb 20164,132

The part-socialist, part-black nationalist Black Panther Party is headline news again, thanks to Beyonce’s Super Bowl 50 halftime show performance of her song “Formation,”–“a big wet kiss to Black Lives Matter” that pays tribute to the 1960s militant group.

In the fall of 1966, the Black Panther Party was founded by left-wing militants Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale. Newton, like Seale, had several run-ins with police. He was convicted and sentenced to 30 years in prison for the shooting death of an Oakland police officer. Publicity around his arrest and the popularity of “Free Newton” propaganda provided the public pressure that led to his release.

Seale and seven others (now known as the Chicago Seven) were arrested at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Seale was sentenced to four years in prison for contempt of court. He now lives and works with young political activists in Oakland, California.

Below are seven facts about the Black Panther Party:

1. The Black Panther Party’s “Platform and Program” called for guaranteed housing, income, and jobs for black people:

We want full employment for our people.

We believe that the federal government is responsible and obligated to give every man employment or a guaranteed income. We believe that if the white American businessmen will not give full employment, then the means of production should be taken from the businessmen and placed in the community so that the people of the community can organize and employ all of its people and give a high standard of living.

We want an end to the robbery by the white man of our Black Community.

We believe that this racist government has robbed us and now we are demanding the overdue debt of forty acres and two mules. Forty acres and two mules was promised 100 years ago as restitution for slave labor and mass murder of black people. We will accept the payment as currency which will be distributed to our many communities. The Germans are now aiding the Jews in Israel for the genocide of the Jewish people. The Germans murdered six million Jews. The American racist has taken part in the slaughter of over twenty million black people; therefore, we feel that this is a modest demand that we make.

We want decent housing, fit for shelter of human beings.

We believe that if the white landlords will not give decent housing to our black community, then the housing and the land should be made into cooperatives so that our community, with government aid, can build and make decent housing for its people.


2. The Black Panther Party was against capitalism and supported socialism:

“We have two evils to fight, capitalism and racism. We must destroy both racism and capitalism,” said Black Panther Party founder Huey P. Newton.

“We do not fight racism with racism. We fight racism with solidarity. We do not fight exploitative capitalism with Black capitalism. We fight capitalism with basic socialism. And we do not fight imperialism with more imperialism. We fight imperialism with proletarian internationalism,” wrote Black Panther Party founder Bobby Seale in his biographySeize the Time: The Story of the Black Panther Party and Huey P. Newton.

3. The Black Panther Party wanted “all black men to be exempt from military service”:

We believe that Black people should not be forced to fight in the military service to defend a racist government that does not protect us. We will not fight and kill other people of color in the world who, like black people, are being victimized by the white racist government of America. We will protect ourselves from the force and violence of the racist police and the racist military, by whatever means necessary.

Rule number six of the “Rules of the Black Panther Party” states, “No party member can join any other army force, other than the Black Liberation Army.”

4. The Black Panther Party supported the Second Amendment as a means to “end police brutality in our black community”:

We believe we can end police brutality in our black community by organizing black self-defense groups that are dedicated to defending our black community from racist police oppression and brutality. The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States gives a right to bear arms. We therefore believe that all black people should arm themselves for self defense.

5. The Black Panther Party called for freedom for all black men held in federal, state, county and city prisons and jails.”

6. In its “Ten-Point Program,” The Black Panther Party sought to overthrow the U.S. government. 

7. The Black Panther Party implored its members not to “ill-treat” those whom they “take captive.”

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson.

Read More Stories About:

Big GovernmentBig HollywoodRacism,BeyonceraceBlack Panther Party

Donald Trump Returns to Core Populist Nationalism in Last Pitch to New Hampshire Before Primaries in Packed Stadium


Associated Press

by MATTHEW BOYLE8 Feb 2016MANCHESTER, New Hampshire1,734

MANCHESTER, New Hampshire — Before a packed 4,000-strong crowd at Verizon Wireless Arena here Monday evening — hours before the polls open in the first-in-the-nation primary state — Donald J. Trump, billionaire and national GOP presidential frontrunner, made his final case to the set of voters who will decide his future.

“So we have something very, very special going on: We’re going to have a country that’s smart, we’re going to have a country that’s tough, that makes the proper decision, that makes the right deals,” Trump said after taking the stage to The Beatles hit “Revolution.” He continued:

Our trade deals are so bad. I have the greatest dealmakers in the world, the richest men, the richest women who are truly successful. The best people in the world, we have them in this country. We don’t use them. We use political hacks. These are political hacks, to negotiate with China, with Japan, with Russia, with Mexico—Mexico, Mexico is taking business away from us folks like you wouldn’t believe. What are we going to do with Mexico, folks? We’re going to build a wall. We’re going to build a wall. And this is going to be a real wall. This is going to be a wall that is going to stop the heroin and the drugs from coming to New Hampshire completely. This is going to stop.


Trump added that this is “sort of our final love fest” before the primaries tomorrow, and he implored everyone to vote. “You have to get out and you have to vote no matter what,” Trump said.

“I don’t care what happens, no matter what, this has been the most amazing experience — the most amazing experience of my life,” Trump added later. “And you people have made it that way. You people have made it that way.”

Trump, who came in second in last week’s Iowa GOP caucuses to the firebrand conservative Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), has upended the entire political process during his entirely unconventional run for the presidency. Most expect Trump to win here handily, while others like Ohio Gov. John Kasich, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) compete for second place. The question that remains is what margin of victory Trump will face, assuming he wins.

Tomorrow’s vote will determine much of what happens next. A big win by Trump — double digits or more — would send him barreling into the first-in-the-South primary state of South Carolina with incredible momentum. A smaller margin of victory could stunt Trump’s efforts to create an appearance of inevitability heading forward, and a loss, meanwhile, could be difficult to recover from.

Moments later, Trump brought his wife Melania, and shortly thereafter his daughter Ivanka, up on stage.

“We love you, New Hampshire,” Melania Trump said. “Together, we will make America great again!”

When Ivanka — who is expecting a child soon — joined him on stage, Trump said, “If she has the baby tonight in New Hampshire, that guarantees victory tomorrow. Please Ivanka, have the baby tonight!”

“I should be so lucky,” Ivanka Trump said. “New Hampshire, thank you so much. It has been amazing spending the last couple of hours here and obviously over the previous weeks I’ve been here quite a bit. My father has called so many times and said just the energy, the enthusiasm, the spirit of the crowds here are amazing. It really encourages us and keeps the momentum going.”

After thanking the local chief of police, who was in attendance, Trump turned back to the core messages of his campaign.

“A couple weeks ago, a politician — Nikki Haley — said in a speech, a rebuttal speech, referring to me, although my name wasn’t mentioned, although it was ultimately confirmed, that I’m angry, that I’m very angry,” Trump said. “And that the people that are with me are very angry. The people that are with me are really with me.”

He referenced polling that shows how loyal Trump’s supporters are as compared to other candidates’ supporters, before walking through how “We’re not angry people.” Trump said:

We don’t want to be angry. But I said right now, I will agree, me personally and a lot of the people that are with me, we are angry. Because we’re angry at incompetence. We’re angry at the Iran deal, where we give away $150 billion and get nothing. We’re angry at our trade deals, where China is making so much money that we’ve rebuilt their country, and then in the meantime our country and infrastructure of our country is going to hell. We’re angry when we make a Sergeant [Bowe] Bergdahl deal, who’s a dirty rotten traitor, where six people were killed looking for him and trying to bring him back. Six young great people killed looking for Sergeant Bergdahl and we make a swap knowing that he was a traitor. They had a colonel and a general talking to these people, and talking to the people that worked with them. They knew he was a traitor. They knew it and we made a deal.


After attacking Obamacare and the ineffective budget deals that feckless House GOP leaders have negotiated, he turned his fire on Common Core and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

“Bush loves Common Core,” Trump said. “He’s the only one that I know that loves Common Core, but that’s okay. We’re going to be bring education back locally. No more Common Core.”

“He’s also weak on immigration—remember they come as an ‘Act of Love,’?” Trump said, ribbing Bush some more.

Trump then hit Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) for his failure to be original, something New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie exposed as Rubio’s robotic nature. Trump said:

They’re politicians, all talk no action and getting re-elected. But you have some good politicians, but it’s mostly people who think about ‘How do I get re-elected?’ So I’m the only one. I’m self-funding. So when these guys see me — I know many of the guys — I’m looking at the room, I’m standing at the debate, I’m watching Marco sweating like a dog on my right. I’m watching Ted Cruz say, ‘No I would never say that about Donald,’ but he said something bad and they asked him ‘You said something bad, would say it again?’ and he said, ‘No,’ and I liked that he didn’t do that because we would have ended up in a big fight. It’s nice that he didn’t, honestly. Honestly, Marco was having a hard time — and I think he’s a nice guy. He’s a nice guy, but again and again and again after three times — I have a very good memory —so after three times, I said, ‘Wait he said that about three minutes ago.’ Then I said, ‘Wait, wait, wait, he said that two minutes ago.’ So after the fifth time I said, ‘What the hell’s going on?’


Trump hammered the permanent political class for looking out only for themselves and not for the American people. Trump walked through the way the crowd at the most recent debate was stacked with donor class figures, and not college kids, noting that “I know half the people out there” when he looked out upon the crowd.

“Sometimes you think the politicians are doing horrible, horrible deals — and they are horrible — but you think they’re really, really not smart people,” Trump said. “But they are actually smart people, but they’re working for themselves. They’re doing what their lobbyists who put up millions and millions and millions of dollars — I’m just talking about the honest stuff.”

Trump then shifted back to immigration, noting:

We’re accepting people and we’re accepting them in by the thousands, and you look at New Hampshire and the problems you have here with the drugs — people come into this country and you have absolutely no idea who they are, where they come from, are they ISIS? Maybe, maybe not. Somebody said, ‘Well ninety percent of them aren’t.’ Really? If we had 10 percent — look at what those two people did a couple months ago, radicalized people, they killed 14 people [in San Bernardino].


Trump walked through the Paris terrorist attacks and how he would defend the Second Amendment — arguing that an armed populous would have prevented the attacks from being as severe as they were, since gun control in France only allows the bad guys to have guns — then he shifted back to how there are criminal fugitive illegal aliens all throughout America right now.

“Right now, as we speak — it was released last week — we have 179,000 illegal criminal immigrants, illegal criminals, these are people who have been convicted of crimes, some very big crimes,” Trump said. “We have 179,000 people here that have committed crimes and shouldn’t be in the country. That’s bigger — 179,000 people is bigger, a lot bigger — than any city in New Hampshire. That’s a massive amount. So we’re going to do something about it.”

Trump harkened back to former President Dwight Eisenhower, who ran “Operation Wetback” and deported masses of illegal aliens back in the 1950s, saying, “I Like Ike.”

“I don’t want to put them in our jails,” Trump said. “Our jails are costing us a fortune. We’re bringing them back where they came from. And we’re going to be respected by those countries — we’re not respected at all by those countries — we’re bringing them back, and let that country put them in prison for the next 25 years, because we’re not going to do it. And they’re never, ever coming back to our country again. Never.”

The crowd roared.

Trump laid out how the rest of the GOP field has followed him on immigration and how other candidates are now talking about wanting to build a wall on the border. Without naming Cruz, Trump knocked him for copying him on the debate stage the other night, also saying there needs to be a wall on the border.

“My wife came up to me, Melania, and she said, ‘Darling did you hear that? That’s the first time I heard that from anybody else but you,’” Trump said. “We have to build a wall. Walls work. Just ask Israel. Walls work. They work. I don’t mean the little walls. I mean those walls. I mean serious walls. I mean Trump walls.”

He then laid out how the federal government, under President Barack Obama, has ordered Border Patrol not to enforce the law. Trump said:

I’ll tell you something, I met the Border Patrol people — they’re phenomenal — and the reason I met them is they called me. They said, ‘I want to meet you’ so I went to Laredo, Texas, and it was incredible. These people are incredible. They’re told to stand back. They’re told don’t touch anybody. They’re told to let people come in. They don’t want that. These are incredible men and women, there are people walking right in front of them and their incredible equipment, except for one thing: They’re told, ‘Don’t do anything.’ And when they do something, they say, ‘Give them a fine, let them go,’ and they go wherever they want, and that’s the end. You never see them again. We either have a country or we don’t. And just let me ask you one question about the wall: Who the hell is going to pay for the wall?”

“MEXICO!” the crowd shouted back at him.

“What?” Trump egged on the crowd.

“MEXICO!” the crowd yelled louder.

After mocking former Mexican president Felipe Calderon for saying Mexico won’t pay for the wall earlier on Monday, Trump said, “You know the wall’s just going to get bigger with that attitude.”

Trump wrapped his speech with a plea to New Hampshire to show up and vote for him because, “We don’t win anymore.”

“We don’t win on trade, we don’t win on anything,” Trump said. “We can’t beat ISIS with our military. Can you imagine Gen. George Patton, ‘We can’t beat ISIS?’ He would beat them by the time we walked out to the front row. We don’t beat ISIS. We’re going to start winning again. We’re going to win on every single level in our country. We’re going to win every single time we do something. We’re not going to make stupid deals anymore. We’re going to be led by smart people and have our smartest people representing us. Now I leave you with this. It’s so important. It’s so important. Tomorrow is going to be the beginning. I hear we have a lead, it doesn’t matter to me. Who the hell knows what the lead is? We have some snow, it looks like it’s going to stop. It’s so important; we have something so special going on. You have to go out, you have to vote, we have to celebrate tomorrow evening, we have to have a great victory. It’s so important, because we are going to make America great again.”

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Does America Need Her Bullies Back?

I read an inspirational but otherwise seemingly benign article today, accompanied by some comments that called into question the very society we live in. 

ABCNews Blogs did a puff piece about a 9 year old girl named Breanna Bond who lost 66 pounds to go from a very obese little girl to one that looks very normal and healthy. The article HERE, also included a video showing a very overweight younger toddler, presumably Breanna, playing on a jungle-gym while the audio in the background was Breanna talking of herself getting "bullied." 

Hidden between the lines of this article are some of the root causes of obesity in millions of American kids. 

The anchor starts off with the usual liberal plays of branding her a victim:

"Struggling with obesity," is what he called it. The article also points out that she was overweight since the day she was born, and so it constantly hints at her "struggle" also known to liberals as a "condition." They want you to think its a disease that she was so unlucky to catch, or be born with. 

The problem arises when the article goes on to contradict this stealthy premise by pointing out that the girl had no medical problems and was able to shed the weight by eating less and exercising more.

The victimization is just starting. Next the article talks about the bullying:

"The California girl soon became a target for bullies. "Everybody at school would call me names," she said. "They would call me fatty, they would call me fat head."
Ok, ok. We get it. We get that this kind of bullying is wrong. It's mean. It doesn't subscribe to the old saying, "Treat other as you would want them to treat you (assuming you don't want to be treated that way)." Nor does it subscribe to, "If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything at all."

But there is a major problem with this Political Correctness. This falls under the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Their family pediatrician told them their 100 pound kindergartener will "grow into her body." The parents eventually "fired" this doctor by getting a second opinion, but the REAL true irony of this is that the commenters representing the public at large piled on! 

A commenter named Michelle wrote, "The pediatrician said a 100 pound kindergartner would "grow into" her body? What kind of crazy doctor is that?"

Her comment got 1354 thumbs up to only 23 thumbs down at the time of this writing. Out of 84 replies to her comment, a majority of them echoed her sentiments. They called him a quack, and irresponsible jerk, and said he should have been the first one to go. Some of them envisioned that the doctor must also be overweight to have said something like that.

I believe that our society of political correctness is to blame, and this doctor was too weak minded to overcome it. Why are we blaming the doctor for what ended up being a diagnosis of "parents need to step up?" Our PC society demands that everyone embrace many bad things including obesity. Isn't it a very fine line between a doctor saying that an otherwise healthy girl needs to lose weight and a "bully" making fun of her for being fat? 

Even Breanna's dad said, "Don't be afraid to do the tough love." I'm willing to bet the Doctor, fearing for his job and possible public scrutiny just said she'll just grow into her body, knowing full well that the truth is that her parents needed to make her lose weight, but was too afraid to say it. The doctor didn't want to be branded a "Bully."

A big problem with liberalism is that you can't ever hurt anyone's feelings or else you are a bully. The truth hurts sometimes. In a liberal America, you need to either lie, keep your mouth shut, or just embrace your title as "Bully." The problem is that nobody wants to fall victim of the PC police and get branded the Bully. The big question is whether or not an America without her Bullies is a better America or not. I guess it depends on whether or not you believe America needs a healthy dose of HONEST "tough love" or not  ...

Friday, December 7, 2012

New Jobs Numbers, AP/Yahoo! Show Liberal Bias

The new jobs numbers came out today, so liberal spin doctor, Christopher Rugaber at the AP launched a headline that the liberals at Yahoo.com were glad to prominently showcase on their front page"

"US economy adds 146K jobs, rate falls to 7.7 pct."

And for their sub heading:

"US economy adds 146K jobs; jobless rate falls to 4-year low of 7.7 percent; Sandy minor factor"


Well isn't that awesome? Well it WOULD be if these headlines really meant what they said. The truth is all over the body of the article and for at least that little bit of honesty, I give Rugaber a little bit of credit. 

He points out:


1.) "the unemployment rate fell to a four-year low in November from 7.9 percent in October mostly because more people stopped looking for work and weren't counted as unemployed."


OUCH.


2.) "The government noted that as long as employees worked at least one day during a pay period — two weeks for most people — its survey would have counted them as employed."


This is ridiculous. So an employer told me to come in twice last month to sweep up the floor and I am counted as employed?


3.) "Still, there were signs that the storm [Sandy] disrupted economic activity. Construction employment dropped 20,000. And weather prevented 369,000 people from getting to work — the most for any month in nearly two years. These workers were still counted as employed."


Besides the fact that this is more cooking of the books, am I the only one that finds it odd that a storm that destroys property would cause construction employment to drop? I digress...


4.) "In November, retailers added 53,000 positions. Temporary help companies added 18,000." 


So of the 146K jobs added, HALF of them are seasonal or temporary. This happens every year, so this cannot be unexpected. Yet the over-hyped headline seems to beg you to believe that these numbers are somehow great news.


5.) "...overall manufacturing jobs fell 7,000. That was pushed down by a loss of 12,000 jobs in food manufacturing that likely reflects the layoff of workers at Hostess."


Thank you, Organized Labor Unions.


So you can see that the FACTS in the article end up contradicting the tone of the headline, which is exactly what the propagandists on the left want you to believe. But on the outside chance the Kool-Aid drinkers actually read and understood the facts of the article, the author made sure to end it with not one but TWO excuses for Obama:


Excuse #1: Sandy - "The storm held back consumer spending and income, which drive economic growth. Consumer spending declined in October and work interruptions caused by Sandy reduced wages and salaries that month by about $18 billion at an annual rate, the government said." 


Excuse #2: Republicans not caving on Democrat demands to raise taxes, leading to what Obama propagandists call, The Fiscal Cliff - "Still, many say economic growth could accelerate next year if the fiscal cliff is avoided."