on
Obama’s now confirmed lie about what really happened in Benghazi. The
Judge asked a simple question… ” Why wouldn’t we impeach this president
for not protecting and defending Americans in the bloodbath known as
Benghazi?”
Watch the segment below.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
on
Obama’s now confirmed lie about what really happened in Benghazi. The
Judge asked a simple question… ” Why wouldn’t we impeach this president
for not protecting and defending Americans in the bloodbath known as
Benghazi?”
Watch the segment below.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpufvvv
Judge Jeanine Pirro used her time Saturday night to unload both barrels
on Obama’s now confirmed lie about what really happened in Benghazi.
The Judge asked a simple question… ” Why wouldn’t we impeach this
president for not protecting and defending Americans in the bloodbath
known as Benghazi?”
Watch the segment below.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
Judge Jeanine Pirro used her time Saturday night to unload both barrels
on Obama’s now confirmed lie about what really happened in Benghazi.
The Judge asked a simple question… ” Why wouldn’t we impeach this
president for not protecting and defending Americans in the bloodbath
known as Benghazi?”
Watch the segment below.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
Judge Jeanine Pirro used her time Saturday night to unload both barrels
on Obama’s now confirmed lie about what really happened in Benghazi.
The Judge asked a simple question… ” Why wouldn’t we impeach this
president for not protecting and defending Americans in the bloodbath
known as Benghazi?”
Watch the segment below.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpufv
Judge Jeanine Pirro used her time Saturday night to unload both barrels
on Obama’s now confirmed lie about what really happened in Benghazi.
The Judge asked a simple question… ” Why wouldn’t we impeach this
president for not protecting and defending Americans in the bloodbath
known as Benghazi?”
Watch the segment below.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
Judge Jeanine Pirro used her time Saturday night to unload both barrels
on Obama’s now confirmed lie about what really happened in Benghazi.
The Judge asked a simple question… ” Why wouldn’t we impeach this
president for not protecting and defending Americans in the bloodbath
known as Benghazi?”
Watch the segment below.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
Judge Jeanine Pirro used her time Saturday night to unload both barrels
on Obama’s now confirmed lie about what really happened in Benghazi.
The Judge asked a simple question… ” Why wouldn’t we impeach this
president for not protecting and defending Americans in the bloodbath
known as Benghazi?”
Watch the segment below.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
Is
it treason when you put your own reelection above the good of your
country and the lives of its citizens? If so, Barack Obama committed
treason in leaving the four Americans to die in Benghazi.
Our Constitution defines it this way: “Treason against the United
States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering
to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Aid and comfort to the enemy — what is that?
When you ascribe an action to the protest of a video when it is
actuality a planned terror attack by Ansar al-Shariah, an established
offshoot of al-Qaeda (if that’s not your “enemy,” then who) — and you
knew that all along, you watched it live without doing anything, and
then you told those who wanted to help to “stand down”? Meanwhile, our
government may have been conspiring to arm another offshoot of al-Qaeda
in Syria.
How much more treasonous can you get? Benedict Arnold was a piker.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
Is
it treason when you put your own reelection above the good of your
country and the lives of its citizens? If so, Barack Obama committed
treason in leaving the four Americans to die in Benghazi.
Our Constitution defines it this way: “Treason against the United
States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering
to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Aid and comfort to the enemy — what is that?
When you ascribe an action to the protest of a video when it is
actuality a planned terror attack by Ansar al-Shariah, an established
offshoot of al-Qaeda (if that’s not your “enemy,” then who) — and you
knew that all along, you watched it live without doing anything, and
then you told those who wanted to help to “stand down”? Meanwhile, our
government may have been conspiring to arm another offshoot of al-Qaeda
in Syria.
How much more treasonous can you get? Benedict Arnold was a piker.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
Is
it treason when you put your own reelection above the good of your
country and the lives of its citizens? If so, Barack Obama committed
treason in leaving the four Americans to die in Benghazi.
Our Constitution defines it this way: “Treason against the United
States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering
to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Aid and comfort to the enemy — what is that?
When you ascribe an action to the protest of a video when it is
actuality a planned terror attack by Ansar al-Shariah, an established
offshoot of al-Qaeda (if that’s not your “enemy,” then who) — and you
knew that all along, you watched it live without doing anything, and
then you told those who wanted to help to “stand down”? Meanwhile, our
government may have been conspiring to arm another offshoot of al-Qaeda
in Syria.
How much more treasonous can you get? Benedict Arnold was a piker.
- See more at:
http://www.libertynews.com/2014/05/obamas-benghazi-lie-isnt-just-impeachable-its-treasonous/#sthash.bCbuhV9O.dpuf
From top to bottom, and left to right: the President and Vice
President being updated on the situation in the Middle East and North
Africa night of September 11, 2012; President Obama, with Secretary of
State Clinton, delivering a statement in the Rose Garden of the White
House, Sept. 12, 2012, regarding the attack on the U.S. consulate; two
photographs released through a FOIA request showing (post-attack) burned
automobile and spray paint graffiti of militant Islamist slogans on
ransacked consulate building; Secretary Clinton testifying before the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on January 23, 2013; portion of
"wanted" poster from FBI seeking information on the attacks in Benghazi.
On the night of September 11, 2012, a heavily armed group of between
125 and 150 gunmen attacked the American diplomatic mission at Benghazi, in Libya, killing U.S. AmbassadorJ. Christopher Stevens and another diplomat. Several hours later in the early morning of the next day, a second assault targeted a nearby CIA
annex in a different compound about one mile away, killing two embassy
security personnel. Ten others were injured in the attacks which were
condemned by the governments of Libya, the United States, and many other countries throughout the world.
Many Libyans praised the late ambassador and staged public demonstrations against the militias that had formed during the civil war to oppose leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.[6][7][8] The Libyan government also began attempts to disband many of the groups.[9]
The United States increased security worldwide at various diplomatic
and military facilities and began investigating the attack.[10][11]
Initially, it was reported[12] that the Benghazi attack emerged from a spontaneous protest against a video, Innocence of Muslims. Subsequent investigations by the U.S. State Department; by the House of Representativescommittees on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Intelligence, the Judiciary, and Oversight and Government Reform; and by the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence determined that there was no protest and that the attack was a planned terrorist attack launched by Islamist militants. These investigations indicate that the notion of Benghazi protests originated from within the intelligence community and the Central Intelligence Agency due to the concurrent worldwide violence and protests resulting from the film Innocence of Muslims.
The debate over the events before, during, and after the attack featured heavily in the 2012 US Presidential election.
In the following months, several congressional and administrative
investigations were launched, some of which are still currently ongoing,
and the topic remains a matter of great controversy, including the CIA's presence and role at the diplomatic mission.
On August 6, 2013, it was reported that the U.S. had filed criminal
charges against several individuals, including militia leader Ahmed Abu Khattala, for alleged involvement in the attacks.[13] To date, a few arrests have been made (none by the FBI). As of April 2014, no one has yet been prosecuted.
On May 2, 2014, House Speaker John Boehner announced that he intends a
House vote to create a select committee to investigate the attack.[14]
Many Islamists played major roles in the Libyan civil war that led to the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. Militants like Abdul Hakeem Belhaj, who fought alongside Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan,[15] other former members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group
or other radical movements, as well as jihadists who had fought in Iraq
and Afghanistan were essential in the effort to overthrow Gadhafi.[16] In March 2011, rebel leaders spoke of their need for anti-aircraft missiles in the ongoing war.[17] That spring, weapons began being shipped to rebels through Qatar with American approval.[18]
In July 2011, it was reported that anti-aircraft missiles were being
raided from bunkers of the Gaddafi regime by Libyan rebels.[19]
By September 2011, Western counterterrorism officials had become
increasingly concerned with the role Islamic radicals were playing in
the revolt in Libya, and worried the weapons acquired by them during the
war would be used in future terrorist attacks.[15]
American presence in Libya and Benghazi
Within months of the start of the Libyan revolution in February 2011,
the CIA began building a meaningful but covert presence in Benghazi.[20] During the war, elite counter-terrorist operators from America's Delta Force were deployed to Libya as analysts, instructing the rebels on specifics about weapons and tactics.[21]:16 Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was named the first liaison with the Libyan opposition in March 2011.[22] After the end of the war, both the CIA
and the US State department were tasked with continuing to identify and
collect arms that had flooded the country during the war, particularly shoulder-fired missiles taken from the former arsenal of the fallen regime of Gaddafi,[23][24] as well as securing Libyan chemical weapon stockpiles, and helping to train Libya's new intelligence service.[20]
Further, eastern Libya and Benghazi were key intelligence-gathering
hubs for intelligence operatives. Before the attack, the CIA was
monitoring Ansar al-Sharia and suspected members of Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb,
as well as attempting to define the leadership and loyalty of the
various militias present and their interaction with the Salafi elements
of Libyan society.[20] By the time of the attack, dozens of CIA operatives were on the ground in Benghazi.[25] In addition, it has been reported that in the summer of 2012, American Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) missions had begun to target Libyan militias linked to the Al-Qaeda network of Yasin al-Suri.[21]:58
By the time of the attack, a composite US Special Operations team with
two JSOC members was already in Libya working on their mission profile
independently of the CIA and State department operations.[21]:58[26]
Multiple anonymous sources reported that the diplomatic mission in
Benghazi was used by CIA as a cover to smuggle weapons from Libya to anti-Assad rebels in Syria.[27][21]:56[28][25][29]Seymour Hersh cites a source among intelligence officials, saying The consulate’s only mission was to provide cover for the moving of arms. It had no real political role. The attack allegedly brought end to active US involvement, but did not stop the smuggling.[30]
In January 2014, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
reported that "All CIA activities in Benghazi were legal and authorized.
On-the-record testimony establishes that CIA was not sending weapons
(including MANPADS) from Libya to Syria, or facilitating other
organizations or states that were transferring weapons from Libya to
Syria."[31]
Instability in Benghazi
In April 2012, two former security guards for the consulate threw a homemade "fish bomb" IED over the consulate fence; the incident did not cause any casualties.[32]
Just 4 days later, a similar bomb was thrown at a four vehicle convoy
carrying the United Nations Special Envoy to Libya, exploding just 12
feet from the UN envoy's vehicle without injuring anyone.[33]
In May 2012 an Al-Qaida affiliate calling itself the Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades claimed responsibility for an attack on the International Red Cross
(ICRC) office in Benghazi. On August 6 the ICRC suspended operations in
Benghazi. The head of the ICRC's delegation in Libya said the aid group
was "appalled" by the attack and "extremely concerned" about escalating
violence in Libya.[34]
The Imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades
released a video of what it said was its detonation of an explosive
device outside the gates of the U.S. consulate on June 5, which caused
no casualties but damaged the consulate's perimeter wall,[35][36] described by one individual as "big enough for forty men to go through."[37] The Brigades claimed that the attack was in response to the killing of Abu Yahya al Libi,
a Libyan al-Qaeda leader who had just died in an American drone attack,
and was also timed to coincide with the imminent arrival of a U.S.
diplomat.[38][39] There were no injuries, but the group left behind leaflets promising more attacks against the U.S.[40]
British ambassador to Libya Dominic Asquith
survived an assassination attempt in Benghazi on June 10. Two British
protection officers were injured in the attack when their convoy was hit
by a rocket-propelled grenade 300 yards from their consulate office.[41] The British Foreign Office withdrew all consular staff from Benghazi in late June.[42][43][44]
On June 18, 2012, the Tunisian consulate in Benghazi was stormed by
individuals affiliated with Ansar Al-Sharia Libya, allegedly because of
"attacks by Tunisian artists against Islam."[21]:31
On the day of the attack:
Al Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri declared that al Libi's death still needed to be avenged.[45]
President Obama was attending a 9/11 ceremony in the morning, and in the afternoon he visited with wounded veterans at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for two-and-a-half hours about the time the Benghazi attack began.[47]
Two consulate security guards spotted a man in a Libyan police
uniform taking pictures of the consulate with his cell phone from a
nearby building that was under construction. The security guards briefly
detained the man before releasing him. He drove away in a police car
and a complaint was made to the Libyan police station. Sean Smith
noticed this surveillance, posting on the internet "assuming we don't
die tonight. We saw one of our 'police' that guard the compound taking
pictures."[21]:34
After the attack, a Benghazi security official and a battalion
commander had met with U.S. diplomats three days before the attack and
had warned the Americans about deteriorating security in the area. The
official told CNN that the diplomats had been advised, "The situation is
frightening, it scares us."[48]
On September 14, CNN correspondent Arwa Damon
found Ambassador Stevens' diary at the unsecured site of the attack. In
it, Stevens expressed his concern about the growing al-Qaeda presence
in the area and his worry about being on an al-Qaeda hit list. The U.S.
State Department later accused CNN of violating privacy and breaking its
promise to Stevens' family that it would not report on the diary.[49]
After a meeting to discuss the deteriorating security situation at
the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, embassy officials in Tripoli
drafted a cable on August 16 outlining the circumstances and specifying
that security needs would be made known in a subsequent message. This
cable, excerpts from which have been reported by Fox News, still remains
classified. But after reading it, Army General Carter Ham,
then the head of the U.S. Africa Command and thus the senior U.S.
military official in the region, phoned Stevens and asked if the
compound needed a special security team from the U.S. military. Stevens
told Ham it did not, according to two government officials. Weeks later,
Stevens traveled to Germany for an already scheduled meeting with Ham
at AFRICOM headquarters. During that meeting, Ham again offered
additional military assets, and Stevens again said no, the two officials
said.[50]
Between 1998 and 2011, U.S. diplomatic sites were subjected to 13 deadly attacks in Nairobi, Kenya; Calcutta, India; Lima,Peru; Karachi, Pakistan; Bali, Indonesia; Karachi, Pakistan; Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Damascus, Syria; Athens, Greece; Istanbul, Turkey; Yemen; and Peshawar, Pakistan.[51]
The attack
The Benghazi attack consisted of military assaults
on two separate U.S. diplomatic compounds. The first assault occurred
at the main compound, approximately 300 yards long and 100 yards wide,
at about 9:40 pm local time (3:40 pm EDT, Washington DC). The second
assault took place at a CIA annex 1.2 miles away at about 4 am the following morning.[52]
It has been referred to as the Battle of Benghazi.[53][54][55]
Assault on the Compound
Map of the U.S. mission (main compound) and annex.
Between 125 and 150 gunmen, "some wearing the Afghan-style tunics
favored by Islamic militants," are reported to have participated in the
assault.[56][57][58] Some had their faces covered and wore flak jackets.[59] Weapons they used during the attack included rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), hand grenades, AK-47 and FN F2000NATO assault rifles, diesel canisters, mortars, and heavy machine guns and artillery mounted on gun trucks.[60][61]
The assault began at nightfall, with the attackers sealing off streets leading to the main compound with gun trucks.[56] The trucks bore the logo of Ansar al-Sharia, a group of Islamist militants working with the local government to manage security in Benghazi.[56]
The area outside the compound before the assault was quiet; one
Libyan guard who was wounded in the attack was quoted as saying "there
wasn't a single ant outside."[57] The attackers stated they were acting in response to the movie.[62]
No more than seven Americans were in the compound, including Ambassador
Stevens, who was visiting Benghazi at the time to review plans to
establish a new cultural center and modernize a hospital.[63]
Ambassador Stevens had his last meeting of the day with a Turkish
diplomat and escorted him to the main gate at about 8:30 pm (local
time). The street outside the compound was calm; the State Department
reported no unusual activity during the day outside.[64] Ambassador Stevens retired to his room about 9 pm; he was alone in the building, according to guards interviewed later.[65]
About 9:40 pm (local time) large numbers of armed men shouting "Allāhu Akbar" descended on the compound from multiple directions.[57][66]
The attackers lobbed grenades over the wall and entered the compound
under a barrage of automatic weapons fire and RPGs, backed by
truck-mounted artillery and anti-aircraft machine guns.[56][65] A Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) agent viewed on the consulate's security cameras "a large number of men, armed men, flowing into the compound."[64] He hit the alarm and started shouting, "Attack! Attack!" over the loudspeaker.[67] Phone calls were made to the embassy in Tripoli, the Diplomatic Security Command Center
in Washington, the Libyan February 17 Brigade, and a U.S. quick
reaction force located at a second compound (the annex) a little more
than a mile away.[58][68]
Ambassador Stevens telephoned Deputy Chief of Mission Gregory Hicks in
Tripoli to tell him the consulate was under attack. Mr. Hicks did not
recognize the phone number so he didn't answer it, twice. On the third
attempt Mr. Hicks answered the call from Ambassador Stevens.[69] Diplomatic Security Service
Special Agent Scott Strickland secured Ambassador Stevens and Sean
Smith, an information management officer, in the main building's safe haven.[68][70] Other agents retrieved their M4 carbines
and tactical gear from another building. They tried to return to the
main building but encountered armed attackers and retreated.[68]
The attackers entered the main building and rattled the locked metal grille of the safe haven.[67] They carried jerrycans of diesel fuel, spread the fuel over the floor and furniture, and set fires.[67][68]
As thick smoke filled the building, Stevens, Smith, and Strickland
moved to the bathroom and lay on the floor, but they decided to leave
the safe haven after being overcome by smoke.[70]
Strickland exited through the window, but Stevens and Smith did not
follow him. Strickland returned several times but couldn't find them in
the smoke; he went up to the roof and radioed other agents.[70]
Three agents returned to the main building in an armored vehicle;
they searched the building and found Smith's body, but not Stevens.[70]
The Regional Security Office sounded the alarm and placed calls to
the Benghazi CIA annex and the embassy in Tripoli, saying, "We're under
attack, we need help, please send help now ..." Then the call cut off.
After some discussion, the CIA's Global Response Staff (GRS) at the CIA
annex, which included senior security operative Tyrone S. Woods,
decided to implement a rescue. By 10:05pm, the team was briefed and
loaded into their armored Toyota Land Cruisers. By this time,
communicators at the CIA annex were notifying the chain of command about
current developments, and a small CIA and JSOC element in Tripoli that
included Glen Doherty was attempting to find a way to Benghazi.[21]:39–43
The GRS team from the CIA
annex arrived at the consulate and attempted to secure the perimeter
and locate the ambassador and Sean Smith. Diplomatic security agent
David Ubben located Smith,[71]
who was unconscious and later declared dead, but the team was unable to
find Stevens in the smoke-filled building. The team then decided to
return to the annex with the survivors and Smith's body. While en route
back to the annex, the group's armored vehicle was hit by AK-47
rifle fire and hand grenades. The vehicle was able to make it to its
destination with two flat tires, however, and the gates to annex were
closed behind them at 11:50pm.[21]:43–45[52]
Abdel-Monem Al-Hurr, the spokesman for Libya's Supreme Security
Committee, said roads leading to the Benghazi consulate compound were
sealed off and Libyan state security forces had surrounded it.[12]
A U.S. Army commando unit was sent to Naval Air Station Sigonella
in Sicily, Italy the night of the attack but did not deploy to
Benghazi. U.S. officials say the team did not arrive at Sigonella until
after the attack was over.[72]
Reaction in the United States
Diplomatic Security Service agents/Regional Security Officers
informed their headquarters in Washington about the attack just as it
was beginning at about 9:40 local time (3:40PM Eastern Time). By 4:30
Eastern, Pentagon officials informed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta about the attack. The Pentagon ordered an unmanned aerial vehicle
that was in the air conducting surveillance on militant camps to fly
over Benghazi. The drone arrived at 11:10 pm local time (5:10 pm Eastern
Time) and began providing a video feed to Washington. At 5:41 pm
Eastern Time, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned CIA Director David Petraeus
to coordinate. The CIA, which made up most of the US government's
presence in Benghazi, had a ten-member security team at its annex and
the State Department believed that this team would assist the consulate
in the event of an attack.[73]
Recovery of Ambassador Stevens
Some of the Libyans who entered the compound apparently tried to
rescue Stevens after they found him lying alone on the floor in a dark
smoke-filled room with a locked door accessible only by a window.[74]
A group of men pulled him out of the room through the window, and then
placed him on the courtyard's stone tile floor. The crowd cheered "God is great" when Stevens was found to be alive. A 22-year-old freelance videographer, Fahd al-Bakoush, later published a video[75] showing Libyans trying to extract the unconscious ambassador from a smoke-filled room,[76][77] where he was found unconscious.[74] At around 1 am, he was then rushed to the Benghazi Medical Center, a hospital controlled by the Ansar Al-Sharia militia,[78] in a private car as there was no ambulance to carry him.[79]
At the hospital Stevens was administered CPR for 90 minutes by Dr. Ziad Abu Zeid.[80] According to Abu Zeid, Stevens died from asphyxiation caused by smoke inhalation, and that Stevens had no other injuries.[81]
The doctor said he believed that officers from the Libyan Interior
Ministry transported the body to the airport and into United States
custody. State Department officials said they do not know who took
Stevens to the hospital or transported the body to the airport and into
U.S. custody.[81] However, Jack Murphy reported that in the absence of orders and on their own initiative, two JSOC
operators from the composite U.S. Special Operations team that was
already in Libya before the attack left their safe house to search for
Ambassador Stevens after they heard about the attack.[26]
They drove into Benghazi, located Stevens's remains at the hospital
controlled by Ansar Al-Sharia, and recovered it after an exchange of
gunfire.
Assault on the CIA annex
Just after midnight, an attack on the CIA annex began, which included
machine gun, rocket and mortar fire. The CIA defenses held off the
attack until the morning of September 12.[21]:45–46
Early in the morning, Libyan government forces met up with a group of
Americans (reinforcements from Tripoli including Glen Doherty[82][83])
that had arrived at the Benghazi airport. The team, which included two
active-duty JSOC operators and five CIA personnel, had commandeered a
small jet in Tripoli by paying the pilots $30,000 and forcing them to
fly the team to Benghazi.[21]:43
After being held up at the airport for a few hours, the Libyan forces
and newly arrived Americans went to the CIA annex at about 5:00am to
assist in transporting approximately 32 Americans at the annex back to
the airport for evacuation. Minutes after they drove through the gates,
the annex came under heavy fire. The team immediately took up defensive
positions. With a lull in the fighting, Glen Doherty
began searching for his friend, Tyrone S. Woods, and he was told he was
on the roof manning a MK46 machine gun. He found Woods on the roof with
two other agents, they quickly embraced, filled each other in, and
retook defensive firing positions. After only a few minutes, a mortar
round hit Woods' position, fatally wounding him. As Doherty attempted to
reposition and take cover, a second round fell on him, killing him
instantly.[21]:46–47[84] 31-year-old Diplomatic Security Service Special Agent David Ubben suffered shrapnel
injuries and several broken bones in the mortar attacks, and according
to Ubben's father, "The first [mortar] dropped 50 yards short and the
next two were right on target."[85]
Immediately, several agents ran onto the roof to assess damage and
help the wounded, who were taken from the roof with a ladder. At the
same time, a JSOC operator was using a hand-held device displaying
images from a Predator drone above, which had been sent by the DOD's
Africa Command after request. The operator told the Chief of Base,
"There's a large element assembling, and we need to get everyone out of
here now!" Evacuation was agreed upon, and everyone was notified to
collect their personal security items and evacuate. Within minutes,
vehicles were loaded, and they headed to the airport. On the way, they
were hit with small arms fire, but arrived with no further injuries.[21]:47–48
During the fighting, the CIA had successfully rescued six State
Department personnel, recovered Smith's body, and had evacuated about
thirty Americans out of Benghazi alive. Most news accounts do not
mention the number of attackers killed. "Benghazi: The Definitive
Report" claims that just under 100 attackers were killed.[21]:46, 48
Evacuation
The bodies were taken to Benina International Airport and flown to the capital, Tripoli, and then to Ramstein Air Base in Germany aboard a C-17military transport aircraft.[86] From Germany, the four bodies arrived at Andrews Air Force Base near Washington, D.C., where President Barack Obama and members of his cabinet held a ceremony in honor of those killed.
After the attack, all diplomatic staff were moved to the capital,
Tripoli, with nonessential personnel to be flown out of Libya. Sensitive
documents remained missing, including documents listing the names of
Libyans working with the Americans, and documents relating to oil
contracts.[87]
Four Americans died in the attack: Ambassador Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith,[88] and two embassy security personnel, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods,[89][90] both former Navy SEALs.[91][92] Stevens is the first U.S. ambassador killed in an attack since Adolph Dubs was killed in 1979.[93] Senior intelligence officials later acknowledged that Woods and Doherty were contracted by the Central Intelligence Agency, not the State Department as previously identified,[94] and were part of a Global Response Staff (GRS), a team that provides security to CIA case officers and countersurveillance and surveillance protection.[95]
On September 14 the remains of the slain Americans were returned to the
United States. President Barack Obama and U.S. Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton honored the Benghazi victims at the Transfer of Remains
Ceremony held at Andrews Air Force Base, Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.
Initial reports indicated that ten Libyan guards died; this was later
retracted and it was reported that seven Libyans were injured.[96]
An early report indicated that three Americans were injured in the
attack and treated at an American Military Hospital in Germany.[97]
Since then, reports differ regarding the number of Americans wounded
in the attacks. The ARB report (released December 20, 2012) stated that 2
Americans were wounded.[98] In March 2013 it was reported that the State Department said there were 4 injured Americans.[99] And in August 2013, CNN reported that 7 Americans were wounded, some seriously.[100]
Glen Doherty
Glen Anthony Doherty (c. 1970 – September 11, 2012) of Encinitas,[101] was a native of Winchester, Massachusetts,[102] and a 1988 graduate of Winchester High School.[103] Doherty was the second of three children born to Bernard and Barbara Doherty. He trained as a pilot at Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University before moving to Snowbird, Utah for several winters and then joining the United States Navy. Doherty served as a Navy SEAL, responded to the bombing of the USS Cole, had tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, and left the Navy in 2005 as a petty officer, first class.[104] After leaving the Navy, he worked for a private security company in Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Kenya and Libya.[102]
In the month prior to the attack, Doherty as a contractor with the
State Department told ABC News in an interview that he personally went
into the field in Libya to track down MANPADS, shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles, and destroy them.[105]
Doherty was a member of the advisory board of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, an organization that opposes proselytizing by religious groups in the United States military.[106] Doherty was co-author of the book The 21st Century Sniper.[106][107]
Doherty's funeral was held at Saint Eulalia's parish in his native Winchester on September 19, 2012.[108] His celebration of life was held in Encinitas, California the weekend of October 12–14, 2012.[109][110]
On September 10, 2012, at least 18 hours before the attack in Benghazi, al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri released a video to coincide with the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks in 2001, which called for attacks on Americans in Libya in order to avenge the death of Abu Yahya al-Libi in a drone strike in Pakistan in June 2012.[5]
It is uncertain how much prior knowledge of the attack al-Zawahiri had,
though he praised the attackers on October 12, 2012 in another video.[121] On September 14, 2012, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula
released a statement arguing the attack was revenge for the death of
al-Libi, though they did not claim official responsibility for the
Benghazi attack.[5] It was later reported that 3 operatives from the group did take part in the attack.[5] Further, an intercepted phone call from the Benghazi area immediately after the attack reportedly linked senior Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb commander Mokhtar Belmokhtar to the attack.[122]
David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times reported that
20-year-old neighbor Mohamed Bishari witnessed the attack. According to
Bishari, it was launched without warning or protest and was led by the Islamist militia Ansar al-Sharia (different from the group called Ansar al-Sharia based in Yemen designated by the U.N. and the U.S. Department of State as a terrorist organization[123]).
Kirkpatrick reported that Ansar al-Sharia said they were launching the
assault in retaliation for the release of the anti-Islamic video, Innocence of Muslims.[124][125]
It was further reported that Ahmed Abu Khattala was called a ringleader
of the attack by both witnesses and authorities, though he insisted he
did not play a part in the aggression at the American compound.
Witnesses, Benghazi residents, and Western news reports have described
him as a leader of Ansar al-Sharia, though he stated he was close to the
group but not an official part of it. He further stated he was the
commander of an Islamist brigade, Abu Obaida ibn al-Jarrah, some of
whose members had joined Ansar al-Sharia.[126]
The imprisoned Omar Abdul Rahman Brigades, a pro-al-Qaeda militia calling for the release of The Blind Sheik, was implicated in the attack by Noman Benotman of the Quilliam Foundation.[1][127][128]CNN,[1] the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,[129]Commentary Magazine[128] and The Daily Telegraph[127]
have listed this group as a chief suspect. USA Today reported that
protests in Cairo which preceded the attack on Benghazi were intended to
protest the imprisonment of Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman and announced as
early as August 30.[130][131] Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi had called for release of the Blind Sheikh in his inaugural address.[131]
In the days and weeks following the attack, President Obama and other administration officials noted that the video had sparked violent incidents
at a number of U.S. diplomatic facilities and stated it was also a
prime catalyst for the Benghazi attack. Two days after the attack, CNN
reporter Sarah Aarthun quoted an anonymous senior U.S. administration
official: "It was not an innocent mob. The video or 9/11 made a handy
excuse and could be fortuitous from their perspective but this was a
clearly planned military-type attack."[132]
In his September 18 appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman,
President Obama said that "extremists and terrorists used (the
anti-Muslim YouTube video) as an excuse to attack a variety of our
embassies."[133]
In his Univision Town Hall appearance on September 20, President Obama
said that the "natural protests that arose because of the outrage over
the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also
directly harm U.S. interests."[134] A later report from an independent review board concluded "there was no protest prior to the attacks."[135]
In October 2012, a Tunisian Ali Harzi, who a US intelligence official
stated had links to Ansar al-Sharia and al-Qaeda in the Maghreb, was
arrested in Turkey and repatriated to Tunisia on terrorism charges and
possible links to the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi.[136] Ali Harzi was released by Tunisian authorities on January 8, 2013 due to lack of evidence.[137]
Also in October, a Libyan suspect, Karim el-Azizi, who had recently
returned to Egypt from Libya and was storing weapons in his hideout,
detonated a bomb and was found dead in his apartment after clashes with
security forces.[138]
He has been linked to an Egyptian terrorist group led by Muhammad Jamal
Abu Ahmad, who is suspected of training some of the terrorists
responsible for the Benghazi attack in camps in the Libyan desert.[139] Jamal Abu Ahmad, a former member of Egyptian Islamic Jihad, was released from Egyptian prison after the fall of the Mubarak regime, after which he began assembling a terrorist network.[140] He received financing from the Yemen-based Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, petitioned Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri to establish a new Al-Qaeda affiliate he called al-Qaeda in Egypt,[139][140] and was subsequently detained by Egyptian authorities in December 2012.[140]
On October 7, 2013, the Muhammad Jamal network (MJN) and Muhammad Jamal
were designated as "global terrorists" by the U.S. Department of State.[141]
The U.S. State Department noted in its designation that Jamal "has
developed connections with al-Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), AQ
senior leadership, and al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)
leadership including Nasir 'Abd-al-Karim 'Abdullah al-Wahishi and Qasim
Yahya Mahdi al-Rimi." A few days later, on October 21, 2013, the United
Nations Security Council designated the MJN "as being associated with
Al-Qaida." [142]
The United Nations Security Council also noted, "Some of the attackers
of the U.S. Mission in Benghazi on 11 September 2012 have been
identified as associates of Muhammad Jamal, and some of the Benghazi
attackers reportedly trained at MJN camps in Libya."
In March 2013, Faraj al-Shibli was detained by Libyan authorities and
questioned by the FBI due to his suspected involvement in the Benghazi
attack.[143]
Al-Shibli was detained after he returned from a trip to Pakistan,
though his exact role in the attack is unclear. He was a member of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group,
which tried to overthrow the Gadhafi regime in the mid-1990s.
Investigators have learned he has had contact with both the Yemen-based Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and Al-Qaeda
members in Pakistan. He was released by Libyan authorities on June 12,
2013 based on claims there was a lack of evidence to hold him in
custody.[144]
Aftermath and controversy
Libyan response
Libyan Prime MinisterMustafa Abushagur's
office condemned the attack and extended condolences, saying: "While
strongly condemning any attempt to abuse the person of Muhammad, or an
insult to our holy places and prejudice against the faith, we reject and
strongly condemn the use of force to terrorize innocent people and the
killing of innocent people." It also reaffirmed "the depth of
relationship between the peoples of Libya and the U.S., which grew
closer with the positions taken by the U.S. government in support of the
revolution of February 17."[145]Mohamed Yousef el-Magariaf, the President of the General National Congress of Libya,
said: "We apologise to the United States, the people and to the whole
world for what happened. We confirm that no-one will escape from
punishment and questioning."[146]
There were demonstrations in Benghazi[147] and Tripoli[148]
on September 12, condemning the violence and holding signs such as
"Chris Stevens was a friend to all Libyans," "Benghazi is against
terrorism," and other signs apologizing to Americans for the actions in
their name and in the name of Muslims. On the same day, Libya's Deputy
Ambassador to London Ahmad Jibril told the BBC that Ansar Al-Sharia was
behind the attack.[149][150] On September 13, at a US State Department reception in Washington D.C., the Libyan ambassador to the US Ali Aujali apologized to Secretary of State Clinton for "this terrorist attack which took place against the American consulate in Libya."[150][151]
The ambassador further praised Stevens as a "dear friend" and a "real
hero". He also urged the United States to continue supporting Libya as
it went "through a very difficult time" and that the young Libyan
government needed help so that it could "maintain ... security and
stability in our country."
In the days after the attack, The New York Times stated that young Libyans had flooded Twitter with pro-American messages after the attacks.[148]Think Progress stated that Libyans are typically more positively inclined towards the United States than their neighbors.[152]
A 2012 Gallup poll noted that "A majority of Libyans (54%) surveyed in
March and April 2012 approve of the leadership of the U.S. – among the
highest approval Gallup has ever recorded in the ... region, outside of
Israel."[153]
Another poll in Eastern Libya, taken in 2011, reported that the
population was at the same time both deeply religious conservative
Muslims and very pro-American, with 90% of respondents reporting
favorable views of the United States.[154][155]
The Libyan response to the crisis was praised and appreciated in the
United States, and President Obama emphasized how the Libyans "helped
our diplomats to safety" to an American audience the following day,[6] while a New York Times editorial criticized Egypt's government for not doing "what Libyan leaders did."[156]
On September 16, Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf said that the attack on the U.S. consulate was planned months in advance,[157]
and further stated that "[t]he idea that this criminal and cowardly act
was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely
unfounded and preposterous. We firmly believe that this was a
precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to
attack the U.S. consulate."[158]
Anti-militia demonstrations
On September 21, about 30,000 Libyans marched through Benghazi
calling for support of the rule of law and for an end to the armed
militias that had formed during the Libyan civil war to oppose Colonel Gaddafi.[7][8] After that war, the militias failed to disband, and continually menaced the Libyan government and populace.[8]
Carrying signs with slogans such as "We Want Justice For Chris" and
"Libya Lost a Friend," the protestors stormed several militia
headquarters, including that of Ansar al-Sharia, an Islamist militia who some allege played a role in the attack on U.S. diplomatic personnel on September 11.[159][160]
At least 10 people were killed and dozens more wounded as militiamen
fired on demonstrators at the headquarters of Sahaty Brigade, a
pro-government militia "operating under the authority of the ministry of
defence."[7][160][161]
By early next morning, the protestors had forced militia members to
flee and seized control of a number of compounds, releasing four
prisoners found inside.[159][160] Protesters burnt a car and a building of at least one facility, and looted weapons.[7][8][160] The militia compounds and many weapons were handed over to Libya's national army[8]
in what "appeared to be part of a coordinated sweep of militia bases by
police, government troops and activists" following the earlier
demonstrations.[159][160] Some militia members accused the protestors of being Gaddafi loyalists, looking to disarm the militias in the wake of the revolution.[8]
Government campaign to disband militias
On September 23, taking advantage of the growing momentum and rising
anger against the militias evinced in the earlier anti-militia
demonstrations,[162] the Libyan president declared that all unauthorized militias had 48 hours to either disband or come under government control.[9][163] The government also mandated that bearing arms in public was now illegal, as were armed checkpoints.[163]
It has been noted that previously, handling the militias had been
difficult as the government had been forced to rely on some of them for
protection and security.[9][162]
However, according to a Libyan interviewed in Tripoli, the government
gained the ability to push back against the militias because of a
"mandate of the people."[9]
On the 24th, the government commenced with a raid on a former military base held by a rogue infantry militia.[164]
Across the country, militias began surrendering to the government.
The government formed a "National Mobile Force" for the purpose of
evicting illegal militias.[165]
On the same day as the declaration, various militias in Misrata held
meetings, ultimately deciding to submit to the government's authority,
and handed over various public facilities they had been holding,
including the city's three main jails, which were handed over to the
authority of the Ministry of Justice.[9]
Hours before the announcement, in Derna, the two main militias (one of
them Ansar al-Sharia) active in the city both withdrew, leaving both
their five military bases behind.[9][162][165]
Hundreds of Libyans, mainly former rebel fighters, gathered in the
city centers of Tripoli and Benghazi to hand over their weapons to the
government on the 29th of September.[166]
However, the campaign has been less successful in other areas, such as the remote Nafusa Mountains, inhabited by the Nafusi-speaking Berber minority,
where the Emirati news agency The National reported on 23 September
that arms were being hoarded. The National also reported arms being
hoarded in Misrata, despite simultaneous reporting by other outlets that
militias were surrendering in Misrata.[167]
U.S. government response
President Barack Obama, with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton,
delivering a statement at the White House on September 12, 2012 in which
he condemned the attack on the U.S. consulate.[168]
On September 12, U.S. PresidentBarack Obama condemned "this outrageous attack" on U.S. diplomatic facilities[169]
and stated that "[s]ince our founding, the United States has been a
nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the
religious beliefs of others."[169]
After referring to "the 9/11 attacks," "troops who made the ultimate
sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan", and "then last night, we learned the
news of this attack in Benghazi"[169]
the President urged, "As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our
freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to
fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their
lives for it."[169] He then went on to say, "No acts of terror
will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character,
or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn
four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of
America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done
for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."[169]
After the attack, Obama ordered that security be increased at all such facilities worldwide.[10] A 50-member MarineFAST team was sent to Libya to "bolster security."[170] It was announced that the FBI would investigate the possibility of the attack being planned.[171] U.S. officials said surveillance over Libya would increase, including the use of unmanned drones, to "hunt for the attackers."[171]
Secretary of State Clinton also made a statement on September 12,
describing the perpetrators as "heavily armed militants" and "a small
and savage group – not the people or government of Libya."[172]
She also reaffirmed "America's commitment to religious tolerance" and
said "Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the
protest that took place at our Embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response
to inflammatory material posted on the internet," but whether true or
not, that was not a justification for violence.[173]
The State Department had previously identified embassy and personnel
security as a major challenge in its budget and priorities report.[174]
On September 12, it was reported that the United States Navy dispatched two Arleigh Burke class destroyers, the USS McFaul and the USS Laboon, to the Libyan coast.[175] The destroyers are equipped with Tomahawkcruise missiles. American UAVs were also sent to fly over Libya to search for the perpetrators of the attack.[176]
In a speech on September 13, in Golden, Colorado,
President Obama paid tribute to the four Americans "killed in an attack
on our diplomatic post in Libya," stating, "We enjoy our security and
our liberty because of the sacrifices they make ... I want people around
the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of
terror will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that
we proudly present to the rest of the world."[177]
In his press briefing on September 14, White House Press Secretary
Jay Carney told reporters that "we don't have and did not have concrete
evidence to suggest that this [the Benghazi attack] was not in reaction
to the film."[178]
He went on to say: "There was no intelligence that in any way could
have been acted on to prevent these attacks. It is – I mean, I think the
DNI spokesman was very declarative about this that the report is false.
The report suggested that there was intelligence that was available
prior to this that led us to believe that this facility would be
attacked, and that is false ... We have no information to suggest that
it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we've seen around the region has
been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive.
And while the violence is reprehensible and unjustified, it is not a
reaction to the 9/11 anniversary that we know of, or to U.S. policy."
On September 14 the remains of the slain Americans were returned to
the U.S. President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton attended
the ceremony. In her remarks Clinton said, "One young woman, her head
covered and her eyes haunted with sadness, held up a handwritten sign
that said 'Thugs and killers don't represent Benghazi nor Islam.' The
President of the Palestinian Authority, who worked closely with Chris
when he served in Jerusalem, sent me a letter remembering his energy and
integrity, and deploring – and I quote – 'an act of ugly terror.'"[179] She went on to say: "We've seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men."
On September 16, the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on five major interview shows to discuss the attacks. Prior to her appearance, Rice was provided with "talking points" from a CIA memo,[180] which stated:
The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations
in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S.
Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S.
diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are
indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.
This assessment may change as additional information is collected and
analyzed and as currently available information continues to be
evaluated. The investigation is ongoing, and the U.S. government is
working with Libyan authorities to bring to justice those responsible
for the deaths of U.S. citizens.[181]
Using these talking points as a guide, Rice stated:
Based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is
as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a
reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of
course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our
embassy—sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous
protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it
looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that-- in that
effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily
now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into
something much, much more violent." "We do not-- we do not have
information at present that leads us to conclude that this was
premeditated or preplanned.""I think it's clear that there were
extremist elements that joined in and escalated the violence. Whether
they were al Qaeda affiliates, whether they were Libyan-based extremists
or al Qaeda itself I think is one of the things we'll have to
determine.[182][183][184][185][186]
In a White House press briefing on September 18, press secretary Jay
Carney explained the attack to reporters: "I'm saying that based on
information that we – our initial information, and that includes all
information – we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this
was a preplanned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it
was sparked by the reaction to this video. And that is what we know thus
far based on the evidence, concrete evidence."[187]
On September 20, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney answered a question about an open hearing with the National Counterterrorism Center Director, Matthew G. Olsen,
which referenced which extremist groups might have been involved.
Carney said, "It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in
Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Our embassy was attacked violently, and
the result was four deaths of American officials. So, again, that's
self-evident."[188] On the same day, during an appearance on Univision,
a Spanish-language television network in the United States, President
Obama stated, "What we do know is that the natural protests that arose
because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by
extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."[189][190][191][192][193]
President Barack Obama addresses the United Nations General Assembly
On September 25, in an address before the United Nations General Assembly
President Obama stated, "The attacks on our civilians in Benghazi were
attacks on America ... And there should be no doubt that we will be
relentless in tracking down the killers and bringing them to justice."[63][194] He referred to Innocence of Muslims
as "a crude and disgusting video [that] sparked outrage throughout the
Muslim world." He said, "I have made it clear that the United States
government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message
must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity."[195] He further stated, "There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy."[196]
On September 26, Clinton acknowledged a possible link between Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and the Benghazi attack.[3]
On September 28, a spokesman for the Director of National
Intelligence stated "In the immediate aftermath, there was information
that led us to assess that the attack began spontaneously following
protests earlier that day at our embassy in Cairo. We provided that
initial assessment to Executive Branch officials and members of
Congress ... As we learned more about the attack, we revised our initial
assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a
deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists. It
remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and
control of the attack, and if extremist group leaders directed their
members to participate."[197]
On October 4, 22 days after the attack, FBI investigators were finally allowed access to the scene of the attack.[198]
The crime scene was not secured during that time; neither American nor
Libyan investigators were able to secure the scene. The hearing
testimony revealed that "Hicks argued that Rice's comments so insulted
the Libyan president -- since they contradicted his Sept. 16 claims that
the attack was premeditated -- that it slowed the FBI's investigation.
'President Magariaf was insulted in front of his own people, in front of
the world. His credibility was reduced,' Hicks said, adding that the
president was apparently 'still steamed' two weeks later."[199]
To assist the Libyan government in disbanding extremist groups, the
Obama administration allocated $8 million to begin building an elite
Libyan commando force over the next year.[200]
In March, 2013, Representative Duncan D. Hunter introduced legislation into the 113th Congress to authorize awarding of Congressional Gold Medals to Doherty and Woods for their actions which led to their deaths.[201] On July 30, 2013 Rep. Edward R. Royce (R, CA-39) introduced the Department of State Operations and Embassy Security Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2014 (H.R. 2848; 113th Congress).[202]
Supporters argued that "this bill advances efforts to improve the
physical infrastructure at posts overseas to comply with the highest
standards of protection; to increase training for those responsible for
guarding our compounds and personnel; to put in place procedures that
respond appropriately to threats, reducing the chances of another attack
like that suffered in Benghazi, Libya; to review the policies and
procedures of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security; to authorize the use of best value
contracting at high risk, high threat posts; to authorize security
improvements at soft targets; and to provide for security enhancements
in line with Accountability Review Board recommendations."[203]
Criticism of U.S. government response
Critics including Republican Party
members accused the Obama White House and State Department of
over-emphasizing or fabricating the role of Islamic anger over the
anti-Islamic movie Innocence of Muslims and alleged that the administration was reluctant to label the attack as "terrorist".[204] Representative Mike Rogers (R-MI), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who on the 13th of September said that the attacks had all the hallmarks of a coordinated attack by al-Qaeda,[205]
has questioned whether there were any protests at all in Benghazi,
saying: "I have seen no information that shows that there was a protest
going on as you have seen around any other embassy at the time. It was
clearly designed to be an attack."[206] According to critics, the consulate site should have been secured better both before and after the attack.
On September 20, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a classified briefing to U.S. Senators,[207] which several Republican attendees criticized.[208]
According to the article, senators were angered at the Obama
administration's rebuff of their attempts to learn details of the
Benghazi attack, only to see that information published the next day in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.
GOP legislators also took issue with delays in the investigation,
which CNN attributed to "bureaucratic infighting" between the FBI, Justice, and State. On 26 September, Senator Johnny Isakson (R-Georgia) said he "cannot believe that the FBI is not on the ground yet."[204]
On CNN'sState of the Union with Candy Crowley
on September 30, Crowley observed that "Friday we got the
administration's sort of definitive statement that this now looks as
though it was a pre-planned attack by a terrorist group, some of whom
were at least sympathetic to al Qaeda," and asked the senior Republican
on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator John McCain,
"why do you think and are you bothered that it has taken them this long
from September 11th to now to get to this conclusion?" to which McCain
replied that "it interferes with the depiction that the administration
is trying to convey that al Qaeda is on the wane ... how else could you
trot out our U.N. ambassador to say this was a spontaneous
demonstration? ... It was either willful ignorance or abysmal
intelligence to think that people come to spontaneous demonstrations
with heavy weapons, mortars, and the attack goes on for hours."[209]
In the Presidential debate of October 16, 2012, between President Obama and Mitt Romney,
Romney claimed that "it took the president 14 days before he called the
attack in Benghazi an act of terror." President Obama responded, "The
day after the attack, governor, I stood in the Rose Garden and I told
the American people and the world that we are going to find out exactly
what happened," Obama said. "That this was an act of terror, and I also
said that we're going to hunt down those who committed this crime."[210]
When Romney challenged Obama, asking "You said in the Rose Garden the
day after the attack, it was an act of terror. It was not a spontaneous
demonstration, is that what you're saying?", the President responded,
"Please proceed, governor" and "Get the transcript." The moderator of
the debate, Candy Crowley, agreed, stating "He -- he did call it an act
of terror." In response to criticism from conservative media sources,
CNN published a fact check article that supported the accuracy of
Crowley's statements with portions of transcripts from the debate and
Obama's Rose Garden speech.[211]
On May 13, 2013, President Obama stated during a news conference,
"The day after it happened, I acknowledged that this was an act of
terrorism." This claim was disputed by Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post
in a "Fact Checker" article, which explored at length the difference in
meaning between the phrases "act of terror" and "act of terrorism."[212] In the article, Kessler accused Obama of "revisionist history" and gave him "Four Pinocchios"
(significant factual error and/or obvious contradictions) for stating
he had called the attack an "act of terrorism" when it fact he had used
the term "act of terror."[212][213]
On CBS'sFace the Nation
on October 28, Senator John McCain (R-AZ) stated that "this is either a
massive cover-up or incompetence" and suggested that it was a scandal
worse than Watergate.
McCain stated, "we know that there were tapes, recordings inside the
consulate during this fight ... So the president went on various shows,
despite what he said in the Rose Garden, about terrorist acts, he went
on several programs, including The View, including Letterman,
including before the UN where he continued to refer, days later, many
days later, to this as a spontaneous demonstration because of a hateful
video. We know that is patently false. What did the president know? When
did he know it? And what did he do about it?"[214]
However, CBS News reported earlier on October 24 that the video of the
assault was recovered 20 days after the attack, from the more than 10
security cameras at the compound.[215] In a radio interview October 29, 2012, Senator John McCain said that the surveillance tapes had been classified top secret.[216]
In April 2013, the Pentagon announced the activation of a USMC quick
response force for North Africa which would use the range and speed of
the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey to be able to respond to similar events in the future.[217]Spain authorized the basing of the quick response force at Morón Air Base near Seville, for a temporary one-year term.[218]
Response to criticism
With the attack and subsequent criticism occurring in the last 2 months of the 2012 United States Presidential election, Democrats and liberal media figures accused Republicans of politicizing the attacks in an unprecedented manner.[219][220]
Romney was accused by the Obama campaign of trying to exploit the
attacks for political gain, leading the father of Ambassador Stevens to
call for both campaigns to avoid making it a campaign issue.[221]
On October 19, 2012, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa
(R-CA) came under fire from intelligence officials in the Obama
administration when he posted, on a public website, 166 pages of
sensitive but unclassified State Department communications related to
Libya. According to officials, the release of the unredacted documents
compromised the identities of several Libyans working with the U.S.
government and placed their lives in danger.[222] Robert Gates, former CIA director
and Defense Secretary under Republican Presidents and then President
Obama until stepping down in July 2011, has said that some critics of
the government's response have a "cartoonish" view of military
capabilities. He stated that he would have responded with equal caution
given the risks and the lack of intelligence on the ground, and that
American forces require planning and preparation which the circumstances
did not allow for.[223]
President Obama called the criticism a "sideshow"[224]
and later accused Congress of "taking its eye off the ball" on the
subject of the economy and focusing on "phony scandals." White House
Spokesman Jay Carney later specified that the criticism of the
administration's handling of the Benghazi attacks was one of those
"phony scandals".[225]
U.S. media response
The Center for Media and Public Affairs
at George Mason University issued a press release that described the
conclusions of an unpublished study on November 2, 2012. Based on a
textual analysis which tallied the occurrence of certain words and
phrases in news reports, the study concluded that leading newspapers in
the U.S. framed the attack in terms of a spontaneous protest (the Obama
administration's version) four times as often as a planned terrorist
attack (the Republican version).[226]
The study was based on a computer-assisted analysis of 2,572 words and
phrases related to the attack in 348 news stories from September 12 to
October 12 in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, and USA Today. On the day of that study's release, two of the newspapers—The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal—published editorials critical of the Obama administration's handling of Benghazi. The Washington Post
editorial asked such questions as, "Did the Obama administration's
political preoccupation with maintaining a light footprint in Libya lead
to an ill-considered reliance on local militias, rather than on U.S.
forces?"[227]The Wall Street Journal editorial asked such questions as "Why did the U.S. not heed warnings about a growing Islamist
presence in Benghazi and better protect the diplomatic mission and CIA
annex?" and "Why has the Administration's story about what took place in
Benghazi been so haphazard and unclear?"[228]
On November 4, two days before the presidential election, CBS News released a portion of its interview with President Obama for 60 Minutes that was filmed on September 12 but did not air originally on its September 23 show.[229] Journalist Bret Baier, host of Special Report with Bret Baier,
noted that in these newly released portions of the interview "Obama
would not say whether he thought the attack was terrorism. Yet he would
later emphasize at a presidential debate that in the Rose Garden the
same day, he had declared the attack an act of terror."[230]
Baier noted that President Obama had been saying that he declared the
Benghazi attack a terrorist attack since his announcement in the Rose
Garden on September 12 and highlighted the newly released video
interview with Steve Kroft:
"KROFT: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid
the use of the word terrorism in connection with the Libya Attack, do
you believe that this was a terrorism attack? OBAMA: Well it's too early
to tell exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but
obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working
with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to
justice, one way or the other."[230]
Allegations of media bias
Some conservatives have argued that the mainstream media
have minimized or ignored the Benghazi story due to alleged liberal
bias and have asserted that if a Republican were president, there would
have been much more critical and aggressive reporting.[231][232][233][234][235][236][237][238][239][240]
Meanwhile, some liberals argued that the media has covered the story
more than they had the thirteen deadly embassy attacks under President
Bush and asserted that much of the coverage was based on recycling
previously debunked myths.[241][242][243]
On September 13, liberal commentator Rachel Maddow, during her show on MSNBC, expressed skepticism that the attack was the spontaneous outgrowth of a protest against the video, stating:
NPR's Leila Fadel
also spoke to a number of witnesses on the scene. People who were in
the area that night. Here's what she reported a short time ago. She
said, "A lot of the witnesses we've spoken to, neighbors, the son of a
landlord, a Libyan guard who was wounded in the first part of the attack
on Tuesday night, all say there was no protest at all. They say it
began and ended as an organized attack on the consulate." An organized
attack. Anybody who tells you that what happened to our ambassador and
our consulate in Libya was as a result of a protest over an offensive
movie, you should ask them why they think that.[244]
Maddow outlined a theory in her show of September 12 that the attack was a response to the killing of Abu Yahya al-Libi.[245]
On the last weekend of October a message posted on Facebook by a Political Action Committee
(SOS PAC) claiming President Obama denied them backup in Benghazi was
taken down twice by the social networking site. After the post was
removed and SOS's Facebook account suspended for 24 hours, the post was
reinstated and SOS received an email from Facebook apologizing for the
matter.[246]
On the October 24 edition of Fox News' channel's Special Report with Bret Baier, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer
claimed that a State Department email, which passed along a report from
Embassy Tripoli that Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility for the
attack on Facebook and Twitter,[247][248]
proved that the White House knew of terrorist connections to the attack
almost immediately. Charles Krauthammer stated, "This is really a
journalistic scandal. I mean, the fact there was not a word about any of
this in the [The New York] Times or the [The Washington] Post today."[249] As noted by Media Matters, the controversy had in fact been reported that day in both the New York Times[248] and the Washington Post,[250] as well as numerous other mainstream media outlets.
Conservative pundit Jonah Goldberg of the National Review argued that, on October 28 (less than two weeks before the presidential election), of the five Sunday news shows, only Fox News
treated it as a major story. In his opinion piece, Goldberg claimed
that of the other four major Sunday political talk shows, the issue of
Benghazi came up only when Republicans mentioned it.[251] Goldberg stated that on NBC's Meet the Press, host David Gregory
changed the subject when a guest raised the subject of the Benghazi
attack, saying, "Let's get to Libya a little bit later," but never
returned to the subject.[251][252]
On November 26, 2012, journalist Tom Ricks went on Fox News' Happening Now with Jon Scott
to discuss the attack. While being interviewed on Fox News by Jon
Scott, Ricks accused Fox News of being "extremely political" in its
coverage of the attack and said that "Fox was operating as a wing of the
Republican Party."
Ricks accused the network of covering the story more than it needed to
be. The interview was cut short and Ricks and the interview was not
mentioned or covered by Fox News again. Fox News was subsequently
criticized for cutting the interview short.[253][254] Jon Scott was also criticized by Media Matters for America for making no mention of the interview on Fox News Watch, a media analysis program he hosts.[255][256] In an interview with the Associated Press, Fox News' White House correspondent Ed Henry
suggested that he thought Benghazi was being covered too much by the
network. Henry said, "We've had the proper emphasis, but I would not be
so deluded to say that some of our shows, some of our commentators, have
covered it more than it needed to be covered."[257][258]
Several official investigations have been completed, are ongoing, or
are under consideration. Investigative reporting has also discovered new
information about the Obama administration's handling of the aftermath
of the attack.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
The FBI opened its investigation soon after the attack and it remains
ongoing. No arrests have been made. On May 2, 2013, the FBI released
photos of three men from the Benghazi attack site, asking for help from
the public in identifying the individuals.[259]
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
The U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence delivered their
bipartisan report on the terrorist attacks on January 15, 2014. The
majority of the committee offered the following conclusions:[260]
The attacks were preventable.
Fifteen people in Libya who have tried to help the FBI investigation have been killed.
There were no protests in the area prior to the attack.
No 'stand down' order was given by President Barack Obama or any
other official anywhere in the government in terms of possible military
efforts to combat the attackers, despite later reports.
The "Benghazi attacks have been the subject of misinformed
speculation and accusations long after the basic facts of the attacks
have been determined, thereby distracting attention from more important
concerns: the tragic deaths of four brave Americans, the hunt for their
attackers, efforts by the U.S. Government to avoid future attacks, and
the future of the U.S-Libya relationship."
The CIA talking points were flawed but still "painted a mostly
accurate picture of the IC's analysis of the Benghazi attacks at that
time, in an unclassified form and without compromising the nascent [FBI]
investigation of the attacks."
No evidence was found of any effort to downplay the role of terrorists enacting a pre-planned strike in the Benghazi attacks.
The reference to "al-Qa'ida" included in early drafts of the talking
points was removed by CIA staff, not by the White House or the FBI, as
was incorrectly alleged by some members of Congress and the press.
The "CIA's September 15, 2012, talking points.. .wrongly attributed
the genesis of the Benghazi attacks to protests that became violent.
However, as stated in the report, this characterization reflected the
assessment by the IC of the information available at that time, which
lacked sufficient intelligence and eyewitness statements to conclude
that there were no protests. Further, it is important to remember that
this early assessment was made in the context of approximately 40
protests around the globe against U.S. embassies and consulates in
response to an inflammatory film. There were also other violent attacks
against U.S. embassies and consulates in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen and other
cities around the world on or after September 11."
In general, the majority concluded "that the interagency
coordination process on the talking points followed normal, but rushed
coordination procedures and that there were no efforts by the White
House or any other Executive Branch entities to 'cover-up' facts or make
alterations for political purposes."
Senators from the Republican Party offered additional views:
The U.S. State Department was resistant to cooperating with the Senate investigation.
The Obama administration manipulated the facts around the attack,
with its handling of the attacks having been "a source of confusion" and
that the "Administration chose to try to frame the story in a way that
minimized any connection to terrorism".
Five House Committees
Five House Committees (Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Intelligence,
Judiciary, and Oversight and Government Reform) initiated their own
inquiries soon after the attack. The Republicans on these five House
Committees delivered an interim report on April 23, 2013.[261]
The interim report was critical of the Obama Administration's actions
before, during, and after the attack. Among dozens of findings, the
report states that:
"Senior State Department officials knew that the threat environment
in Benghazi was high and that the Benghazi compound was vulnerable and
unable to withstand an attack, yet the department continued to
systematically withdraw security personnel"
The "[Obama] Administration willfully perpetuated a deliberately
misleading and incomplete narrative that the attacks evolved from a
political demonstration caused by a YouTube video."
"... after a White House Deputies Meeting on Saturday, September 15,
2012, the Administration altered the talking points to remove
references to the likely participation of Islamic extremists in the
attacks. The Administration also removed references to the threat of
extremists linked to al-Qa'ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya ..."
"The Administration deflected responsibility by blaming the IC
[intelligence community] for the information it communicated to the
public in both the talking points and the subsequent narrative it
perpetuated."
Additional congressional hearings were conducted May 8, 2013 with
three "whistleblower" witnesses: Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant
Secretary of State for counterterrorism; Greg Hicks, former deputy chief
of mission in Libya; and Eric Nordstrom, former regional security
officer in Libya.[262]
On November 7, 2013, Representative David Nunes (R-CA) wrote a letter
to House Speaker John Boehner a week ahead of congressional hearing
with CIA contractors who were on the ground during the attack. Nunes
wrote that if questions remain unanswered or "if some answers differ
substantially from the established narrative and timeline of the attack,
then it would be warranted to take new measures to complete the
investigation and synthesize the information obtained by the
Intelligence Committees and other committees investigating the Benghazi
attack."[263]
State Department Accountability Review Board
As required by the Omnibus Diplomatic and Antiterrorism Act of 1986,
the State Department announced on October 4, 2012 an Accountability
Review Board "to examine the facts and circumstances of the attacks."[264] Four members were selected by Clinton and another was selected by Director of National IntelligenceJames R. Clapper. Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering served as the Chairman, Admiral Michael Mullen served as the Vice Chairman, also serving were Catherine Bertini, Richard Shinnick, and Hugh Turner, who represented the intelligence community.[98]
The investigation report[98]
was released December 20, 2012. It was seen as a sharp criticism of
State Department officials in Washington for ignoring requests for more
guards and safety upgrades, and for failing to adapt security procedures
to a deteriorating security environment. "Systemic failures and
leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two
bureaus of the State Department ... resulted in a special mission
security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate
to deal with the attack that took place," said the unclassified version
of the report.[265] It also blamed too much reliance on local militias who failed to fend off the attackers that evening.[266] The Council on Foreign Relations in an initial report saw it as a refutation to the notion that the Obama administration delayed its response.[267]
However, it confirmed that contrary to initial accounts, there was no
protest outside the consulate. It placed responsibility for the incident
solely upon the attackers, deemed as terrorists.[268]
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Joe
Lieberman (ID-CT) and Ranking Member Susan Collins (R-ME) opened an
investigation in mid October 2012. Their final report was delivered
December 31, 2012.[269]
According to the report, "there was a high risk of a 'significant'
terrorist attack on U.S. employees and facilities in Benghazi in the
months before the September 11, 2012, assault on the Mission, and the
State Department failed to take adequate steps to reduce the Mission's
vulnerability."
House Select Committee on the Terrorist Attack in Benghazi
On January 18, 2013, Representative Frank Wolf (R-VA) introduced a
bill (HR 36) to establish a select committee to investigate and report
on the attack.[270] As of November 7, 2013, the bill has 178 cosponsors in the House of Representatives, all Republicans.[263][271] Supporting the formation of a select committee are 700 special operations veterans,[272] Special Operations OPSEC,[273] and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (which represents the DSS agents in Benghazi).[271]
Investigative reporting
Numerous eyewitnesses reported that the attackers said they were reacting to the film Innocence of Muslims.[125][274][124][275][12][276]
On May 3, 2013, Stephen Hayes wrote in The Weekly Standard
that new evidence showed "senior Obama administration officials
knowingly misled the country about what had happened in the days
following the assaults."[277]
Hayes said that there was a flurry of revisions made to the talking
points in the days before Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations, appeared on five Sunday television talk shows. Included in the
cuts were references to "Islamic extremists," reminders of warnings
about al Qaeda in Libya, a reference to "jihadists" in Cairo, the
mention of possible surveillance of the facility in Benghazi, and the
report of five previous attacks on foreign interests.
On May 10, 2013, ABC News' Jonathan Karl reported that Stephen Hayes
had "obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they
were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written
entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk
shows."[278] The changes made to the talking points,[279]
according to the report, appear to directly contradict what White House
Press Secretary Jay Carney said about them in November 2012.
Afterwards, Carney stated the reports did not contradict what he said
and that it was the CIA's task to review the talking points.[278]
The White House then released copies of various emails that were sent
to various administration officials shortly after the attack took place
to prove that there was no cover up.[280]
On the May 12 episode of ABC News This Week, Karl said that when
then-CIA Director David Petraeus saw the final talking points the
Saturday before Rice went on the Sunday talk shows he said they were
"essentially useless". Karl went on to quote from an e-mail in which
Petraeus said of the talking points: "I would just as soon not use them,
but it's their [the White House's] call."[281]
Research by other media outlets later proved that Karl's report was
inaccurate, as his sources had twisted what was written in the
documents.[280]
On the May 19 episode of ABC News This Week, Karl announced he
regretted reporting the inaccuracy and acknowledged that he exaggerated
the words Obama speechwriter Ben Rhodes had written in one of emails
cited in the documents.[280] Memos written by State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland
also revealed that she made the revisions because they "could be abused
by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying
attention to warnings."[278]
On July 11, Nuland, who was nominated by Obama to be the top US envoy
to Europe, told various members of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee during a confirmation hearing that she had made the revisions
and that she had feared Republicans in Congress would politicize the
original memos and present a false impression that various top US State
Department officials, including then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,
had covered-up information about the attack.[282]
In August 2013, it was reported by Drew Griffin and Kathleen Johnston
of CNN that dozens of CIA operatives were on the ground in Benghazi on
the night of the attack.[25]
Their sources say 35 people were on the ground in Benghazi the night of
attack, and 21 of those worked in the annex building. They further
reported that according to their sources the agency was going to great
lengths to keep what they were doing a secret, including polygraphing
some of the survivors monthly in order to find out if they were talking
to the media or Congress. The actions of the CIA were described as pure
intimidation, with any leak risking the loss of a career. Former CIA
agent Robert Baer described the frequency of the polygraphs as rare.
A six-part report on an investigation by the New York Times on the attack was published on the Times website on 28 December 2013.[283]
Based on "months of investigation" and "extensive interviews with
Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its
context", the investigation found "no evidence that Al Qaeda or other
international terrorist groups" had any role in the assault, but that
that the attackers included militias that "benefited directly from
NATO's extensive air power and logistics support" overthrowing Colonel
Qaddafi, and whom the Americans "had taken for allies".[283]
It found that the US compound "had been under surveillance at least 12
hours before the assault started", but that the attack also had
"spontaneous elements".
Anger at the video [Innocence of Muslims]
motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them
provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false
rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan
protesters. Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the
ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack, according to
more than a dozen Libyan witnesses as well as many American officials
who have viewed the footage from security cameras.[283]
In the following weeks, several U.S. lawmakers (both Democrats and
Republicans), publicly stated that "the intelligence indicates that al
Qaeda was involved."[284][285]
FOIA requests
Montage of seven photographs released under a FOIA request to Judicial Watch from the Department of State.
FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests have been made by some organizations since the attack. The conservative foundation Judicial Watch
filed a FOIA request to the Department of State on December 19, 2012.
An acknowledgement of the request was received by Judicial Watch on
January 4, 2013. When the State Department failed to respond to the
request by February 4, 2013, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit, which
resulted in seven photographs being delivered on June 6, 2013.[286]
Three of the photographs show Arabic-language spray paint graffiti.
According to preliminary translations provided to the U.K. MailOnline by
the Investigative Project on Terrorism, the graffiti likely reads
"Thrones of HamzaIn"; "Allah-u Akbar" ("God is Great"); and "Unity of
ranks".[287]
On May 30, 2013 it was reported that the Republican National Committee
filed a FOIA for "any and all emails or other documents containing the
terms 'Libya' and/or 'Benghazi' dated between September 11, 2012 and
November 7, 2012 directed from or to U.S. Department of State employees
originating from, or addressed to, persons whose email addresses end in
either 'barackobama.com' or 'dnc.org.'"[288]
On August 16, 2013, CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson tweeted
to her followers that the FBI and White House denied her FOIA requests.[289]
On April 18, 2014, the conservative group Judicial Watch released more than 100 pages of documents obtained through a FOIA lawsuit.[290] One of the emails from white house advisor Ben Rhodes states:
"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy;"[291]
Previously unreleased internal Obama administration emails show that a
coordinated effort was made in the days following the Benghazi terror
attacks to portray the incident as "rooted in [an] Internet video, and
not [in] a broader failure or policy." Emails sent by senior White House
adviser Ben Rhodes to other top administration officials reveal an
effort to insulate President Barack Obama from the attacks that killed
four Americans.
Issa, Darrell; Chaffetz, Jason (October 2, 2012). Letter to Hillary Clinton (PDF). House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Retrieved October 7, 2012.
May, Clifford D. (8 November 2012). "Lessons of the Battle of Benghazi". National Review Online. Retrieved 11 November 2012.
"Now that the election is behind us, perhaps we can put politics aside
and acknowledge a hard fact: On September 11, 2012, America was defeated
by al-Qaeda in the Battle of Benghazi."
Ackerman, Spencer (12 November 2012). "What Happened in Benghazi Was a Battle". Wired. Retrieved 11 November 2012. "Which means the next battle of Benghazi could be even more intense than the last."
"DCPD-201200719
- REMARKS AT A TRANSFER OF REMAINS CEREMONY FOR THE VICTIMS OF THE
ATTACK ON THE U.S. MISSION IN BENGHAZI, LIBYA". U.S. Government Printing Office. 14 September 2012. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
"The President spoke at 2:46 p.m. at Joint Base Andrews, MD. In his
remarks, he referred to Dorothy Narvaez-Woods, wife, Tyrone Jr. and
Hunter, sons, and Kai, daughter, of Tyrone S. Woods, security officer,
Department of State; and Heather Smith, wife of Sean P. Smith, foreign
service officer, Department of State, and their children Samantha and
Nathan." Pratt, Timothy (14 September 2012). "SEAL Veteran With Zest for Adrenaline". New York Times. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
"Mr. Woods had recently moved from La Jolla, Calif., with his wife,
Dorothy, and their infant son, Kai, to a quiet suburban cul-de-sac in
Henderson, Nev., less than 10 miles from the Las Vegas Strip. He is also
survived by two teenage sons from his marriage to Ms. So, Tyrone Jr.
and Hunter."
Kirkpatrick, David D.; Suliman Ali Zway; Osama Alfitori; Mayy El Sheikh (December 28, 2013). "A Deadly Mix in Benghazi". New York Times. Retrieved 29 December 2013.