Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Poll: The Donald and Hillary Nearly Tied, Clinton’s Lead Drops to One Point over Trump

Listen to Military Veteran Talk Radio
iHeart.SmythRadio.com
Facebook.com/SmythRadio

Brendan Smialowski, Kena Betancur / AFP / Getty Images

by ALEX SWOYER5 Jul 2016Washington, DC3,514

Listen to Military Veteran Talk Radio
iHeart.SmythRadio.com
Facebook.com/SmythRadio

A new Morning Consult poll published on Tuesday reveals presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s lead over presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump dropped to only one point within the margin of error.

Forty-one percent of voters surveyed said they prefer Clinton while 40 percent said they prefer Trump. However, Clinton’s one point lead is within the plus or minus two percentage point margin of error.

The previous Morning Consult poll had Clinton leading Trump by five points. This is the best showing the billionaire has had against Clinton in a Morning Consult head-to-head matchup since the primaries ended.

Independents preferred Trump over Clinton by one point, 33 percent to 32 percent.

As for Congressional races, 43 percent of voters said they will likely vote for a Democrat over a Republican.

The poll was conducted with 2,001 registered voters from June 30th through the Fourth of July holiday weekend.

Read More Stories About:

2016 Presidential RaceBig Government,Hillary Clinton

Thursday, January 28, 2016

FBI's Clinton investigation not letting up

Listen to Military Veteran Talk Radio
iHeart.SmythRadio.com

thehill.com

Six months after it began, the federal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server shows no signs of slowing down.

Former FBI officials said the length of the probe is not unusual, and speculated that a decision on whether to file charges against Clinton of her top aides could come later this year, during the heat of the general election campaign.

“I don’t know that there’s any magical cutoff date,” said Ron Hosko, the FBI’s former assistant director of the criminal investigative division and a 30-year veteran of the bureau.

For Democrats, the extended investigation has become a source of some anxiety, with Republicans gleefully raising the prospect of their presidential front-runner being indicted.

“It does give pause to Democrats who are concerned that there may be another shoe to drop down the road,” said Andrew Smith, a political science professor at the University of New Hampshire.

The government has been looking into the possible mishandling of classified information since last July, when the inspector general for the intelligence community issued a security referral about the possible mishandling of classified information on Clinton's server.

That referral came months after Clinton acknowledged that she had exclusively used a personal email address housed on a private server during her tenure as secretary of State.

The scrutiny of Clinton’s email practices has mounted since then, as more than 1,300 emails that passed through her “homebrew” setup have been marked as classified, some at the highest levels.

The State Department and Clinton’s campaign contend that none of the information in the emails was classified when it was originally sent, and have portrayed the matter as an inter-agency dispute.

The FBI and Justice Department have refused to discuss the details of their investigation and declined to comment to The Hill.

However, officials have indicated that the bureau is not targeting Clinton specifically, but instead is investigating whether any information on her account was mishandled. Earlier this month, Fox News reported that the FBI had expanded its probe to examine how the State Department’s work intersected with the Clinton family foundation.

In December, FBI Director James Comey pledged that the probe would be “competent,” “honest” and “independent.”

“We don't give a rip about politics,” he told a Senate committee.

Yet the FBI is well aware of the high political stakes surrounding the investigation.

“I think the clock ticks louder every day,” said Hosko, who is the president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund. “I’m sure they’re all incredibly sensitive to it.”

President Obama has downplayed Clinton’s email setup, claiming that it was “not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

Multiple former officials, lawmakers and lawyers have said they are confident that Comey, who is a Republican, will not let the presidential campaign influence the FBI’s investigation. 

Yet many conservatives worry that even if the FBI comes up with sufficient evidence that Clinton broke the law, the Justice Department will decline to press charges. In response, some have pressed for a special prosecutor to be appointed, or for the FBI to pledge to release the evidence that it dug up. 

So far, Democrats have largely publicly shrugged of the threat of criminal action by painting it as a partisan attack from Republicans.

Clinton’s top rival, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), channeled the feelings of Democrats in October when he told Clinton during a debate that “the American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails.”

But Clinton will have to confront the issue more forcefully if charges are actually filed. 

And should Clinton win the nomination, the topic is sure to rear its head in the general election — even if no indictment is ever handed down. 

A general election fight over the emails could weaken Democratic enthusiasm and turn off swing voters, some analysts predicted. 

“More likely, it’s going to sour some of those folks in the middle,” said Doug Roscoe, a political science professor at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.

“Having to be in the news talking about this investigation takes her off-message,” he added.

It might not be Clinton herself who faces the music for any potential crime, however.

The former secretary of State did not appear to send most of the emails now marked classified. Instead, they were largely sent or forwarded along to her by close aides.

“It’d be a lot harder to make a criminal charge for having received [classified] information," said Bradley Moss, a lawyer who specializes in national security and protection of classified information

“If I’m in Clinton’s campaign, I’m more worried if am Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin or Jake Sullivan than if I’m Hillary Clinton,” Moss said. Mills, Abedin and Sullivan were all top aides of Clinton’s at the State Department. Abedin and Sullivan continue to hold high positions in Clinton’s presidential campaign. 

“The sloppiness and the complete fundamental failure to comply with any aspect of operational and informational security is what puts them at risk,” Moss said. “You just can’t do that that many times and not expect to find yourself in trouble.”

Clinton’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment from The Hill.

COMMENTS

Friday, January 8, 2016

Is Hillary Eligible for the Presidency?

January 07, 2016

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  Now, folks, it's also not a surprise that the Drive-Bys would be going after Cruz. And seriously, even though they made fun and mocked anybody who was a quote/unquote "birther" back during the Obama years, it's expected.  Of course.  This is an opportunity for so much. It's quid pro quo. It's payback. Plus there's a real opportunity to take out a conservative they all hate.  So of course they're gonna take it seriously.  I'll tell you something here, folks.  You know who really, really, really might be ineligible to run for the presidency?  And it isn't Ted Cruz.  Nobody on the Republican side.  Let's examine Hillary Clinton in terms of eligibility. 

She might not be eligible to be elected president when everybody gets finished.  Look at this, 18 US Code 107: "Concealment, Removal, or Mutilation Generally: Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. ... and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States." 

...and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office..."

If she is ever indicted on this e-mail business, or if they find that she has mutilated, destroyed, hidden, or otherwise done away with documents that were classified that came under her purview? Sorry, folks. She's gotta be convicted, of course. But if that were to ever happen, she's not qualified. She's not eligible to run.  And, I'm telling you, this has as much (if not more) possibility and relevance than whatever they're trying to manufacture here about Ted Cruz.  We've gotta be very careful not to take our eyes off who the real enemy is.  It's the Democrats, folks.  It's not fellow Republicans.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  No, I'm dead serious, folks.  Look at this.  "Hillary Clinton’s Criminal Indictment Looms…"Yesterday was Joe diGenova saying so.  Today there's a piece at the DC Whispers blog.  "Talk of a possible indictment against former Obama Secretary of State and current Democrat presidential frontrunner, Hillary Clinton have swirled for months. Whispers now indicate that over the last forty-eight hours that talk has turned very-very serious."

I don't know what's gonna happen there, but it is ramping up.  Look, she's admitted she deleted half of the e-mails on that server.  The law is very clear here.  Now, don't misunderstand, I don't think it's automatic this is gonna happen, just like this Cruz thing.  Can I make another observation?  This is fascinating to me.  Look at the lather everybody willingly gets themselves worked up into about what citizenship is and how it's defined and then whether or not Ted Cruz can legitimately run for president.  Look at the lather this has everybody worked up into.  And yet there's hardly any concern whatsoever about what illegal noncitizens are allowed to do. 

We bend over backwards.  We extend the full welfare state and then some to the illegals who come into this country illegally.  The Democrat Party goes out of its away to find ways to keep them here.  The Democrat Party's looking for undercover ways to extend temporary quasi-citizenship to them so they could vote.  We have people that get worked up about this, obviously, about the politics of it. 

But my point is we're talking about illegal immigrants, there's much more sympathy and much more compassion, and we're told that we must be understanding.  And these are people fleeing disaster-torn areas of the world. They just want to make a better life and they come to the United States, who are we to say no.  We have somebody that's an actual citizen here, we're trying to drum 'em out of the country, we're trying to drum 'em out of the presidential race.  They're all worked up over whether or not a citizen is a citizen and then what that citizen can or cannot do.  I just find the juxtaposition of those things fascinating. 

Look, all it took was Trump bringing this up, "Hey, you know what, Ted might want to look into this.  I would hate for Ted to be sidelined by a lawsuit down the road."  And everybody, on cue, like there's a Svengali or pied piper out there, everybody just falls into line and starts behaving exactly as whoever is responsible for this wanted them to behave.  And so today the entire focus of the so-called Republican Party, conservative movement, is on Ted Cruz and not Hillary Clinton and not Bernie Sanders, who, by the way, I'm gonna remind you again, is creeping up and is so close to Mrs. Clinton. They are getting practically paranoid, petrified with fear inside the Clinton campaign over Bernie, not just where he is in the polls in some of these states, but the amount of money he's raising. 

You're not reading about it because the Drive-By Media circle the wagons doing everything they can to protect Hillary.  I mean, I have great example of that in The Politico today that is hilarious, and I will do you the honor of analyzing it and translating it for you, 'cause it is just classic, how they're trying to distance Hillary from Obama now.  And the stretches and the extortions and the twists and the pretzel-like moves they make in order to create distance between Hillary and Obama is classically funny.  

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Here is Mike in Bethel, Connecticut.  Great to have you on the EIB Network.  Hello.

CALLER:  Hello, Rush.  How are you?  I'm surprised they haven't outlawed tampons in California.

RUSH:  (laughing) Yeah, right.

CALLER:  Listen, I want to raise a hypothetical with you.  Let's say the Justice Department has an epiphany and does something proper with Hillary and she's out of the race. I think Bernie Sanders, for all his popularity and everything you've discussed, he, you know, has a strong showing out there, but he doesn't have one or two of the things that Obama has, you know, one being the first African-American president, and everybody had glow in their eyes.  So I think the question becomes what do the Democrats do, and there will be lots of smoke filled back rooms where people are wondering, 'cause I don't think O'Malley will be the choice, and Biden isn't gonna --

RUSH:  Now, now, now, wait just a second, because it's interesting that you mentioned this, because I don't think Hillary is gonna be indicted.  I know. I respect Joe diGenova, and just to repeat, diGenova thinks she's gonna be indicted in 60 days.  He thinks the FBI is just loaded up with evidence; it's so much evidence that if the attorney general does not charge that there's gonna be a revolt at the FBI like there was in Watergate when the solicitor general refused to fire somebody on Nixon's order.

That's when Bork came along and did it. He thinks there's gonna be a revolt, diGenova says. Look, he's the guy. He's been there. He would know. He's not gonna just say this off the top of his head. He's got to know this.  He's the kind of person who would have the connections to know how close the FBI is, what kind of evidence they had, how much of it.  He wouldn't be going out saying this stuff. Unless he's senile.  And I just saw him on TV. He doesn't look senile.  He says, "Look, it is mountainous, and they are continuing to investigate."

They're up to 1400 e-mails that she trafficked in that are classified, and they're adding to it all the time.  And there's more evidence than just that.  And he thinks there's no way she won't be indicted in 60 days, and that if Loretta Lynch and Obama pull the plug on it and don't indict, that there's gonna be a revolt, that that's how much evidence they've got.  I can't see it.  For one of the reasons you brought up: Who are they gonna have? The Democrat Party runs this Regime or you should you could say this Regime is the Democrat Party.

I mean, if they indict Hillary, they are knowingly taking her out of the race.  Now, if that happens, folks, it means they never wanted her in this in the first place -- and 2007, 2008 was not a coincidence, that Obama just didn't decide to surface and run, come out of nowhere and win.  If that happens, it means that somebody somewhere doesn't want the Clintons anywhere back near the White House or presidential power.  I can't see it.  And it's not because I don't believe that the Clintons are immune and that they are not held accountable the same forces we all are.

I just don't see the Democrat Party, Obama taking her out?  I might be persuaded somebody who knew that maybe there's a genuine animus that Obama has for Hillary, maybe Obama does not want her responsible for continuing his legacy.  I'd have to be told this, though, and I'd have to be told this in a very convincing way by somebody who knew.  I don't want to suppose this.  But if it does happen, Martin O'Malley is not gonna be the guy.  But don't discount Bernie Sanders.  I mean, yeah, he's not gonna be the first anything other than old guy. 

Hillary would be the first woman, but, you know, Bernie's not Hispanic, he's not female, he's not transgender. No first there.  But he is raising money. He's raising a lot of money, and his polling numbers are closer to Hillary in a few states that anybody knows.  But don't forget over there old Plugs.  Remember when Plugs made his big announcement, Biden, that he wasn't going to run for president. When he was finished, what was everybody's reaction?  That sounded sure as heck like a guy who is running.  He laid out what his agenda would be. 

He laid out what his reason for running would be. He laid out what he wanted to accomplish.  In the midst of saying he wasn't gonna do it.  And some people said, "You know what?  This sounds like a guy who is laying down markers for getting in this race if something untoward happens to front-runners and he has to get in. He's already got the groundwork laid, the framework put out," and he's talking about it.  He's out there... There's a story. I got a story in the Stack today, Plugs is saying he thinks every day about running for president.

Every day he thinks about doing it, every day he thinks about his decision not to do it, every

Thursday, January 7, 2016

OBAMA’S NEW GUN CONTROL TEAM IS 8X LARGER THAN HIS ANTI-ISIS TEAM

More Resources for Gun Control

We are at war with Islamic extremists, and Obama cannot even bring himself to use terrorist and Islam in the same sentence. Nevertheless, ISIS and other Islamic groups have called for the the destruction of Israel, American and the West unless they convert to Islam. Obama has been absolutely miserly in providing resources to destroy this enemy of America, and insistent that bombing runs drop warning leaflets on ISIS targets before unleashing actual bombs sufficient to turn the tide.

He was wrong, and ISIS is actually gaining strength, or at least was until Russia entered the fray. With the risk so great, and the American people so insistent that this is the number one issue he must address, Obama instead has decided that he will invite tens of thousands of Muslims to come live in the United States, even though the immigration department has clearly indicated that they cannot properly vet the huge number of migrants to ensure they are not agents of ISIS. It is incomprehensible unless you decide that his true goal is the destruction of America.

And now Obama has indicated that gun control is much more important than keeping Americans safe from terrorism. He has shown that by the resources he is willing to dedicate to gun control in comparison to the bigger issue of terrorism.

President Obama plans to build a new gun control force of 430 agents, more than eight times the size of the team of commandos he is sending to the Middle East to hunt down and destroy ISIS terrorists.

According to a White House fact sheet, the president plans to deploy 200 more Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,Firearms and Explosives agents “to help enforce our gun laws.”

He also plans to add at least 230 new FBI agents to pour over the backgrounds of gun buyers. Said the White House: “The FBI will hire more than 230 additional examiners and other staff to help process these background checks.”

In Iraq, by comparison, the White House is moving to install an estimated 50-200 special operations forces to take down ISIS.

An Associated Press report said the commandos would number around 50, with the rest in supporting roles.


This is wrong on so many levels it is hard to comprehend. Even liberal media outlets have indicated that the proposals made by Obama yesterday would have done little or nothing to quell the gun violence that has been committed in the last several years. The proposals are simply an attack on the ability of law-abiding citizens to purchase a gun and defend themselves without undue intrusion from the government.

The proposals also raise serious issues of government ability to come into an individuals home without a warrant or other protections afforded by the Constitution. The biggest question of all is why Obama is so determined to go against the will of the people and to violate so many laws in order to force his will. And that gets back to priorities.

Given that the new executive order will anger much of the nation, will violate so many laws, and will do nothing to take guns out of the hands of criminals or quell violence, why is gun prohibition or confiscation so high on Obama’s priority list? That is the larger question regarding this lawless and imperial president, and the possible answers so dark and dispiriting.

Source: Washingtonexaminer.com

Absolutely Questions about pregnancy Commitments Soundtrack

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Did BLM Bury Bundy Cattle In Mass Grave? WARNING, GRAPHIC IMAGES

Did BLM Bury Bundy Cattle In Mass Grave? WARNING, GRAPHIC IMAGES

Did BLM Bury Bundy Cattle In Mass Grave? WARNING, GRAPHIC IMAGES

By: Annabelle Bamforth
132
Bunkerville, NEVADA, April 16, 2014– Ben Swann interviewed Ryan Bundy, son of Cliven Bundy, on his radio program Wednesday. Bundy spoke about the continuing battle over the grazing land, the next steps federal agents may take, and what has already taken place on the property so far.
Bundy told Swann that federal agents have fled the area and left a great deal of gear and equipment and that they aren’t likely to return any time soon for it. He also said that federal agents destroyed much of the grazing infrastructure on the land, including water lines, water tanks, troughs, corrals, and fences.

The damage didn’t stop at just destroying infrastructure: Bundy revealed that their cattle, about 40 or so, had been killed by federal agents and thrown into a mass grave.
“The mass grave that was dug was about 50 feet long, 18 feet wide, 10 feet deep, and about a third of the way filled back in with cattle.”
In these photographs provided to Benswann.com from the Bundy family, you can see that so called mass grave which was dug out with the use of a backhoe. Already inside that dirt grave you can see the body of at least one of the cattle.
10261680_10152078267466483_554103197_n
mass grave
mass grave
mass grave
mass grave
Bundy said that he could also see where the cattle had been killed out in the hills, in the corrals, and where they were shot down by helicopters.
Here you can see this bull was shot out in the open:
Cow shot and left to die
Cow shot and left to die
Bullet entry
Bullet entry
Another shot cow
Cow shot in corral