Friday, January 8, 2016

Ann Coulter: Only 'President Trump' Can Save Us From Turning Into 'Uganda'


Ann Coulter was not impressed by Tuesday night’s Republican presidential debate on CNN, telling Florida talk radio host Joyce Kaufman yesterday that only Donald Trump isn’t “embarrassed about getting white votes” and recognizes that “the threat facing America right now is we’re about to become Uganda.”
Coulter told Kaufman that she’s fed up with Republicans comparing themselves to Ronald Reagan. “For Pete’s sake,” she said, “Reagan was elected 35 years ago. The world was a different place. The main problem facing America is no longer the threat of a nuke from the Soviet Union, it’s not encroaching communism, the threat facing America right now is we’re about to become Uganda.” She added they we may also soon be “living under Sharia law.”
Coulter then lit into RNC chairman Reince Priebus for attempting to strike an inclusive tone in remarks before the debate.
“‘We are the Republican party and that means we welcome Hispanics, Asians, women,’” she paraphrased Priebus saying.
“What on earth?” she demanded. “And, by the way, I noticed that white men weren’t included on the list of people that Republicans stand for. Why are Republicans embarrassed about getting white votes? What is that? Democrats can’t get them, I can see why Democrats are always going around dissing white people, but why does the Republican have to be embarrassed about getting white votes?”
This prompted Kaufman to lament that even Republicans are adopting the “bankrupt philosophy” that “inherent white privilege” exists. “It’s all like a bad movie, Ann,” she said, “and every day I wake up and I say, I don’t know how this story ends.”
“I know how it ends,” Coulter responded. “President Trump”

FILED UNDER

- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ann-coulter-only-president-trump-can-save-us-turning-uganda#sthash.FhAhts5e.dpuf

MORE EUROPEAN CITIES report Muslim Sex Attacks on New Year’s Eve: ZURICH, HELSINKI


ByPAMELA GELLER on January 7, 2016

GLOBAL JIHAD 2016 MUSLIM IMMIGRATION 

23 Comments

    

The news of Muslim sex attacks is being censored, whitewashed, and covered up. In Germany, the attacks were coordinated — that was a New Year’s jihad-terror attack.

Photo: One of the victims of the Stuttgart attack. (Photo from Facebook).

Finnish police reported Thursday an unusually high level of sexual harassment in Helsinki on New Year’s Eve and said they had been tipped off about plans by groups of asylum seekers to sexually harass women.

Helsinki deputy police chief Ilkka Koskimaki told AFP: “There hasn’t been this kind of harassment on previous New Year’s Eves or other occasions for that matter… This is a completely new phenomenon in Helsinki.”


Security guards hired to patrol the city on New Year’s Eve told police there had been “widespread sexual harassment” at a central square where around 20,000 people had gathered for celebrations.

Zurich: ‘Dark Skinned’ Men Molested Six Women on New Year’s Eve.” AFP, January 17, 2015:

At least six women have reported Cologne-style sexual harassment and molestation while celebrating the New Year in Zurich, according to local news sources.

Although information from the Swiss city has been less detailed than what is now known about the rapes, sexual harassment, and theft in German city centres, the victims have apparently reported men who were “dark skinned” to be the perpetrators.

It is not yet known if the Zurich sexual assaults have been committed by recently arrived migrants, as is believed to be the case in Cologne, but the news of the epidemic of sexual attacks now seems widespread across Europe and not simply confined to Germany.

Earlier, Finnish authorities reported that a similar scenario had been seen in Helsinki, citing an unusually high level of sexual harassment.

Helsinki deputy police chief Ilkka Koskimaki told AFP of some of the attacks reported, noting: “Police have… received information about three cases of sexual assault, of which two have been filed as complaints,” Helsinki police said in a statement.

“The suspects were asylum seekers. The three were caught and taken into custody on the spot,” Koskimaki told AFP.

Despite public reluctance, and increased parliamentary representation for anti mass migration Swiss People’s Party – which is the largest party in the country – Switzerland still agreed to take 1,500 “refugees” as part of a European Union resettlement plan at the tail end of 2015.

The nation has been criticised by the United Nations refugee agency for being too strict on immigration, but the latest news will no doubt vindicate the government’s stance and lead to a further hardening of public sentiment towards migrants


- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/01/more-cities-reports-of-muslim-sex-attacks-on-new-years-eve-in-zurich-helsinki.html/#sthash.6orkCAic.dpuf

Is Hillary Eligible for the Presidency?

January 07, 2016

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  Now, folks, it's also not a surprise that the Drive-Bys would be going after Cruz. And seriously, even though they made fun and mocked anybody who was a quote/unquote "birther" back during the Obama years, it's expected.  Of course.  This is an opportunity for so much. It's quid pro quo. It's payback. Plus there's a real opportunity to take out a conservative they all hate.  So of course they're gonna take it seriously.  I'll tell you something here, folks.  You know who really, really, really might be ineligible to run for the presidency?  And it isn't Ted Cruz.  Nobody on the Republican side.  Let's examine Hillary Clinton in terms of eligibility. 

She might not be eligible to be elected president when everybody gets finished.  Look at this, 18 US Code 107: "Concealment, Removal, or Mutilation Generally: Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. ... and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States." 

...and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office..."

If she is ever indicted on this e-mail business, or if they find that she has mutilated, destroyed, hidden, or otherwise done away with documents that were classified that came under her purview? Sorry, folks. She's gotta be convicted, of course. But if that were to ever happen, she's not qualified. She's not eligible to run.  And, I'm telling you, this has as much (if not more) possibility and relevance than whatever they're trying to manufacture here about Ted Cruz.  We've gotta be very careful not to take our eyes off who the real enemy is.  It's the Democrats, folks.  It's not fellow Republicans.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  No, I'm dead serious, folks.  Look at this.  "Hillary Clinton’s Criminal Indictment Looms…"Yesterday was Joe diGenova saying so.  Today there's a piece at the DC Whispers blog.  "Talk of a possible indictment against former Obama Secretary of State and current Democrat presidential frontrunner, Hillary Clinton have swirled for months. Whispers now indicate that over the last forty-eight hours that talk has turned very-very serious."

I don't know what's gonna happen there, but it is ramping up.  Look, she's admitted she deleted half of the e-mails on that server.  The law is very clear here.  Now, don't misunderstand, I don't think it's automatic this is gonna happen, just like this Cruz thing.  Can I make another observation?  This is fascinating to me.  Look at the lather everybody willingly gets themselves worked up into about what citizenship is and how it's defined and then whether or not Ted Cruz can legitimately run for president.  Look at the lather this has everybody worked up into.  And yet there's hardly any concern whatsoever about what illegal noncitizens are allowed to do. 

We bend over backwards.  We extend the full welfare state and then some to the illegals who come into this country illegally.  The Democrat Party goes out of its away to find ways to keep them here.  The Democrat Party's looking for undercover ways to extend temporary quasi-citizenship to them so they could vote.  We have people that get worked up about this, obviously, about the politics of it. 

But my point is we're talking about illegal immigrants, there's much more sympathy and much more compassion, and we're told that we must be understanding.  And these are people fleeing disaster-torn areas of the world. They just want to make a better life and they come to the United States, who are we to say no.  We have somebody that's an actual citizen here, we're trying to drum 'em out of the country, we're trying to drum 'em out of the presidential race.  They're all worked up over whether or not a citizen is a citizen and then what that citizen can or cannot do.  I just find the juxtaposition of those things fascinating. 

Look, all it took was Trump bringing this up, "Hey, you know what, Ted might want to look into this.  I would hate for Ted to be sidelined by a lawsuit down the road."  And everybody, on cue, like there's a Svengali or pied piper out there, everybody just falls into line and starts behaving exactly as whoever is responsible for this wanted them to behave.  And so today the entire focus of the so-called Republican Party, conservative movement, is on Ted Cruz and not Hillary Clinton and not Bernie Sanders, who, by the way, I'm gonna remind you again, is creeping up and is so close to Mrs. Clinton. They are getting practically paranoid, petrified with fear inside the Clinton campaign over Bernie, not just where he is in the polls in some of these states, but the amount of money he's raising. 

You're not reading about it because the Drive-By Media circle the wagons doing everything they can to protect Hillary.  I mean, I have great example of that in The Politico today that is hilarious, and I will do you the honor of analyzing it and translating it for you, 'cause it is just classic, how they're trying to distance Hillary from Obama now.  And the stretches and the extortions and the twists and the pretzel-like moves they make in order to create distance between Hillary and Obama is classically funny.  

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Here is Mike in Bethel, Connecticut.  Great to have you on the EIB Network.  Hello.

CALLER:  Hello, Rush.  How are you?  I'm surprised they haven't outlawed tampons in California.

RUSH:  (laughing) Yeah, right.

CALLER:  Listen, I want to raise a hypothetical with you.  Let's say the Justice Department has an epiphany and does something proper with Hillary and she's out of the race. I think Bernie Sanders, for all his popularity and everything you've discussed, he, you know, has a strong showing out there, but he doesn't have one or two of the things that Obama has, you know, one being the first African-American president, and everybody had glow in their eyes.  So I think the question becomes what do the Democrats do, and there will be lots of smoke filled back rooms where people are wondering, 'cause I don't think O'Malley will be the choice, and Biden isn't gonna --

RUSH:  Now, now, now, wait just a second, because it's interesting that you mentioned this, because I don't think Hillary is gonna be indicted.  I know. I respect Joe diGenova, and just to repeat, diGenova thinks she's gonna be indicted in 60 days.  He thinks the FBI is just loaded up with evidence; it's so much evidence that if the attorney general does not charge that there's gonna be a revolt at the FBI like there was in Watergate when the solicitor general refused to fire somebody on Nixon's order.

That's when Bork came along and did it. He thinks there's gonna be a revolt, diGenova says. Look, he's the guy. He's been there. He would know. He's not gonna just say this off the top of his head. He's got to know this.  He's the kind of person who would have the connections to know how close the FBI is, what kind of evidence they had, how much of it.  He wouldn't be going out saying this stuff. Unless he's senile.  And I just saw him on TV. He doesn't look senile.  He says, "Look, it is mountainous, and they are continuing to investigate."

They're up to 1400 e-mails that she trafficked in that are classified, and they're adding to it all the time.  And there's more evidence than just that.  And he thinks there's no way she won't be indicted in 60 days, and that if Loretta Lynch and Obama pull the plug on it and don't indict, that there's gonna be a revolt, that that's how much evidence they've got.  I can't see it.  For one of the reasons you brought up: Who are they gonna have? The Democrat Party runs this Regime or you should you could say this Regime is the Democrat Party.

I mean, if they indict Hillary, they are knowingly taking her out of the race.  Now, if that happens, folks, it means they never wanted her in this in the first place -- and 2007, 2008 was not a coincidence, that Obama just didn't decide to surface and run, come out of nowhere and win.  If that happens, it means that somebody somewhere doesn't want the Clintons anywhere back near the White House or presidential power.  I can't see it.  And it's not because I don't believe that the Clintons are immune and that they are not held accountable the same forces we all are.

I just don't see the Democrat Party, Obama taking her out?  I might be persuaded somebody who knew that maybe there's a genuine animus that Obama has for Hillary, maybe Obama does not want her responsible for continuing his legacy.  I'd have to be told this, though, and I'd have to be told this in a very convincing way by somebody who knew.  I don't want to suppose this.  But if it does happen, Martin O'Malley is not gonna be the guy.  But don't discount Bernie Sanders.  I mean, yeah, he's not gonna be the first anything other than old guy. 

Hillary would be the first woman, but, you know, Bernie's not Hispanic, he's not female, he's not transgender. No first there.  But he is raising money. He's raising a lot of money, and his polling numbers are closer to Hillary in a few states that anybody knows.  But don't forget over there old Plugs.  Remember when Plugs made his big announcement, Biden, that he wasn't going to run for president. When he was finished, what was everybody's reaction?  That sounded sure as heck like a guy who is running.  He laid out what his agenda would be. 

He laid out what his reason for running would be. He laid out what he wanted to accomplish.  In the midst of saying he wasn't gonna do it.  And some people said, "You know what?  This sounds like a guy who is laying down markers for getting in this race if something untoward happens to front-runners and he has to get in. He's already got the groundwork laid, the framework put out," and he's talking about it.  He's out there... There's a story. I got a story in the Stack today, Plugs is saying he thinks every day about running for president.

Every day he thinks about doing it, every day he thinks about his decision not to do it, every

Thursday, January 7, 2016

Donald Trump just threw the kitchen sink at the Clintons

www.washingtonpost.com

This post has been updated.

On Thursday morning, Donald Trump upped the ante in his ongoing back and forth with Hillary and Bill Clinton by releasing this Instagram video detailing some of the lowest moments for the former first family and their friends.

Monica Lewinsky. Anthony Weiner. Bill Cosby! All overlaid on Hillary Clinton's famous assertion in China in 1995 that "human rights are women’s rights and women’s rights are human rights."

The video, which as of this writing already had almost 7,000 "likes" on Instagram, will undoubtedly get extended airtime this afternoon and tonight on cable television. And it will force the Clinton campaign to respond in some shape or form - which she did, sort of, via Twitter Thursday afternoon.

Unlike many of Trump's other fights — over John McCain's POW status, Megyn Kelly, Fox News — attacking the Clintons is a conventional — and smart — strategy in a Republican primary.

Hillary Clinton is deeply unpopular among self-identified Republicans. Just 15 percent of Republicans had a favorable opinion of Clinton in Washington Post-ABC News polling done in the fall. Given those numbers, it's hard for any Republican to go wrong attacking the Clintons.

And it's hard to "go too far" in those attacks — at least in the eyes of GOP voters. Lots and lots of Republicans believe that the Clintons have never truly been called out for how they acted in public office and never been properly shamed for their behavior. Attacking Bill Clinton for his admitted extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky or noting that Weiner, a Clinton friend, was sending salacious pictures of his privates to women on the Internet is not only considered fair game but is also applauded by the very voters Trump wants and needs if he is going to be the Republican presidential nominee.

Former president Bill Clinton spoke in New Hampshire on Jan. 4, his first speech in support of his wife, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton, in 2016. (The Washington Post)

The "attack Clinton" strategy also hews to a strategy that has earned Trump broad support among GOP voters: He says what he believes and believes what he says. Trump doesn't apologize — no matter the blowback. He's the opposite of politically correct, a very good place to be in an environment in which large numbers of Republicans believe that liberal-led political correctness is destroying society.

As always with Trump, it's hard to know how much of what he does is the result of well-thought-out political calculation and how much is simply him saying, "Let's do a video with Monica, Weiner and Cosby in it!"

Regardless, his strategic antenna — even when it has operated directly against conventional wisdom — has been perfectly tuned for the majority of this race. His decision to up the attack on the Clintons — and, in particular, Hillary's position as a leader on women's rights — makes perfect sense from a conventional political perspective. Which, if past is prologue with Trump, means it won't work.

COMMENTS

Hillary Could Face Indictment within 60 days

As Written By Sarah Westwood for The Washington Examiner:

A former U.S. attorney thinks Hillary Clinton could face a criminal indictment from the FBI within the next 60 days.

Joe DiGenova, a Republican U.S. attorney appointed by President Reagan, said Clinton’s “biggest problem right now” is the open FBI investigation into the contents of her private emails.

“They have reached a critical mass in their investigation of the secretary and all of her senior staff,” DiGenova said Tuesday on the “Laura Ingraham Show” radio program. “And, it’s going to come to a head, I would suggest, in the next 60 days.”

FBI Director James Comey has refused to answer questions about when his agents will wrap up a months-long probe into whether Clinton and her staff mishandled classified information on an unsecured network.

KEEP READING THE REST OF THIS STORY HERE

Nolte: The Cultural and Media Reality of the ‘Cruz Crisis’

Steve Pope/Getty Images

by JOHN NOLTE7 Jan 20161,140

On his radio show Wednesday, Mark Levin called out Breitbart News over the issueSen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)’s citizenship, “[J]ust because [Donald Trump] says something doesn’t mean I have to agree with it like our friends over at Breitbart, who are going all kinds of crazy over the birther issue.” Levin, who knows plenty about the Constitution, believes the debate over Cruz’s eligibility to be president is “stupid.” But he adds, without realizing that this is the only point that matters, “Liberals love this stuff.”

First off, as cut and dried as Cruz’s citizenship issue might be to Levin, the trip to the “cut and dried” is objectively murky. My colleague Joel Pollak, who attended Harvard Law School,  lays it all out here. Pollak doesn’t question Cruz’s eligibility; he does, however, understand modern American politics and lays out a convincing case as to why the issue could eventually become a problem for Cruz.

As of right now, Ted Cruz has a legitimate chance at winning the Republican nomination, and because Levin is 100% correct when he says “liberals love this stuff,” my question is a simple one:

As “stupid” as this issue may be for Levin, do we want to litigate it in front of the American people today or three weeks before the general election, when Cruz is either our presidential or vice-presidential nominee? Because you have to be wearing blinders to believe that will not happen.

If Cruz is on the ticket, you can bet the farm that Democrats and the DC Media have already gamed out an October Surprise centered on creating a political storm over Cruz’s natural born status. Moreover, all it would take is one federal judge to hurl a massive monkey into that wrench.

Exhibit A: The Clintons are the Original Birthers. If they went after Obama over this issue, who doesn’t believe they will go after Cruz?

Exhibit B: High-profile Democrats arealready vowing to sue over Cruz’s eligibility.

Exhibit C: The White House proved yesterday that at the highest levels, Democrats are fully prepared to make this an issue.

Exhibit D: We’re still waiting for independent verification that Cruz’s mother was indeed an American citizen. Wouldn’t now be a good time to drop that shoe, however it falls?

Even if you side 100% with Levin on this issue, tell me how unrealistic it is to imagine a federal judge ruling on October 21, 2016, that Ted Cruz’s citizenship status is questionable. Cruz is running for president. We can’t just take his word on this.

If that happens, just like the phony late-October Casper Weinberger indictment that killed George H.W. Bush’s re-election momentum in 1992, we lose.

Trump is actually doing Cruz a huge favor. In Trump’s defense, he was asked about the Cruz issue, which  doesn’t mean his intentions are not mercenary, but it also means that the net-benefit has been to prematurely explode the DC Media’s planned October Surprise.

Even if it is “stupid,” so was accusing Romney of murder in 2012, of not paying his taxes, of blaming him for Todd Akin. But with the coordinated help of the entire DC Media-complex, that’s exactly what Democrats did. Nobody believed any of it, which was never the goal. The goal was to keep Romney off-message and on defense, and it worked.

How different would the 2000 election outcome have looked had a Donald Trump brought up George W. Bush’s drunk driving incident during the primary?

This may be cut and dried for Levin, but how does his opinion control the actions of Democrats and the media? How does his opinion change the fact that there is no independent verification that Cruz’s mother was an American citizen.

The national debate over Cruz’s eligibility *is* going to happen, and it must happen.

The only question, then, is *when* will this be litigated once and for all in front of the American people.

Who doesn’t think now is better than October?

 

Follow John Nolte on Twitter@NolteNC               

Read More Stories About:

Big Journalism2016 Presidential Race,Mark LevincanadaTed Cruz 2016Birther,Natural Born Citizenbirtherism

Donald Trump Venue-Busting Ticket Distribution Worries Vermont Officials

Supporters of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump cheer as Trump gets ready to speak to a crowd Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2016, in Claremont, N.H.AP Photo/Jim Cole

AP Photo/Jim Cole

by CAROLINE MAY7 Jan 201656

The Donald

by CAROLINE MAY
7 Jan 2016
56
The Donald Trump campaign has distributed so many tickets for a Thursday evening rally in Burlington, Vermont that police in the area are expressing concerns that the venue is too small and could present a safety hazard.

According to the Burlington Free Press, while the Trump campaign has distributed 20,000 tickets for the event, the venue — the Flynn Center — can seat just 1,400.

“If Phish was holding a free concert at the Flynn and gave away 20,000 free tickets, we would cancel the event out of public safety concerns,” Burlington Police Chief Brandon del Pozo told the paper. “We are committed to accommodating the campaign because political speech is the very essence of the First Amendment.”

The Flynn Center’s executive director John Killacky said the event would be open-seating and offered on a first-come first-serve basis.

“We’ve been working with the Secret Service very carefully along with the Burlington Police Department,” Killacky told the paper.

The Republican frontrunner has been holding venue-busting rallies across the country as he makes his case to be the party’s nominee.

Trump’s rally Thursday in the solidly-blue Vermont is slated for 7pm and, as NBC News notes, will occur across the street from Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)’ campaign headquarters. The Hill reports that some Sanders’ supporters have schemed on Facebook to reserve tickets but then not show up.

Read More Stories About:
Big Government, 2016 Presidential Race, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, 2016 GOP Presidential Primaries, Vermont